In post 2002, PenguinPower wrote:Lulz. Ok, LUV. You caught me on semantics.
p-edit
Aw, F'no. Don't you f-ing compare me to f'ing donald f'ing Trump. Do something the f'else. But don't you bring that shit in here.
In post 2005, PenguinPower wrote:@nn: That's your opinion. You could prove that you weren't a liar, but you don't.
In post 2010, Zoronos wrote:I am having trouble following the thread of this conversation, but I think we're in meta land again kinda.
I do appreciate that you're with me on PP -> Scum NN! But I'd prefer that meta not be used as the basis for that. Meta for, meta against, all just meta. Meta, in my experience, is fertile ground for confirmation bias. It's too easy to see what you're already looking for in meta.
Anyway. I think the most productive question to ask about PP, the one that leads me to think he's scum, is "Is PP making an earnest effort to solve the game, identify the scum, and advance his case for that? Is he working with his town reads to sort out scum from town?" I feel the answer here is no.
I'm going to be off for a few hours at least, laters.
In post 2012, Zoronos wrote:And I respect that. I just wanted to chime in before darting off for the rest of the evening.
That's the main reason I dislike meta. Not that it's always wrong, or that it's always right. It's just so easy to see the thing you're looking for already in it.
In post 2009, nn30 wrote:Actually, I'll play ball for a second.
Penguin, please explain why I, as a townie, would lie about my meta read on you?
In post 2014, PenguinPower wrote:In post 2009, nn30 wrote:Actually, I'll play ball for a second.
Penguin, please explain why I, as a townie, would lie about my meta read on you?
Absolutely not. You aren't playing ball, so why should I? Prove your scum read - beyond just stating - then I will defend myself.
nn wrote:Yep. Scum.
Town would be attempting to work with me and get me on their side. Because. Ya know. We need to work together to find scum.
In post 2022, Shadow_step wrote:@mod, what result will a cop get on a traitor?
In post 1985, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Hm, Shadow seemed like he had more to say about Gamma's claim. Want to hear more from him.
Why am I being scum read again? Anyone actually buy the cases boring and Prism are presenting?
In post 1618, boring wrote:Spoiler:
Since I have time for ISO diving, I thought I'd dredge up these gems.
VOTE: LUV
Now, since we have plenty of time before EOD, I'd "luv" it if you could explain how/why you so drastically flipped script with your intent and hammer. From here, it looks like you magically went from suspecting Shadow (while agreeing that there couldn't be two ascetics) to deciding "yolo! I'm going to hammer the other guy". As far as I can tell, all that happened in between was your trip down the rabbit hole with Gamma.
In post 1988, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Oh and by the way, I'll be playing from here on forward. Don't think I'll have enough time to do an entire reread of Day 1.