Shadow you dirty dog.
Goddamnit lol.
I'm so gullible.
@Boring - thanks... lol.
Shadow you dirty dog.
Ah, okay.In post 2775, nn30 wrote:Shadow you dirty dog.
Goddamnit lol.
I'm so gullible.
@Boring - thanks... lol.
Your probably going to hove to do more then this to lynch me btw.
Dier's played very carefully, and has no obvious associations. It's one of the reasons I think he's a likely scum. LUV was the closest association thus far, and will be irrelevant after the flip. I don't think his flip will point anywhere in particular, which will leave us in the same position tomorrow as far as the scum-hunt goes.In post 2778, Grendel wrote:General question.
Would who you lynch next according to what Dier had flipped?
Like if he flipped mafia then x would be the next to go,
or if he flipped town then y would be the next to go.
They won't give a mafia member a role which can counter all the PRs town have. It's too OP.In post 2766, nn30 wrote:We have 1) a cop 2) probably a deputy and 3) probably a jailer and 4) an ascetic.In post 2753, Shadow_step wrote:Just say "yes this is my case" for my sanity.In post 2734, Shadow_step wrote:I can't even be ascetic mafia goon, too scumsided.In post 2731, boring wrote:What are you even talking about? The first part includes responses.In post 2729, Shadow_step wrote:I've responded to the first part which you never replied to.
If I'm an ascetic RB, this setup is ridiculously scum sided, so that whole argument is balls.
Next
Why do you really thinkIf I'm an ascetic RB, this setup is ridiculously scum sidedis relevant to anything I've said? I don't think you're necessarily ascetic or RB. I just think you're scum.
So let me get this straight. You're case against me is that I CCed Eager a useless role at night(according to threat to mafia) by a role I didn't have ?
So apparently I can get fucked any night if someone bothers to check me.
Yeah okay. Brilliant case. You want a scummy?
Anyone scum reading me should consider this.
It's impossible for me to be mafia ascetic anything because of the minimal amount of power town has and ascetic can counter both.
We could have a mafia ascetic something in this game. Just means mafia power is concentrated on one member. Not impossible.
Plus, if you're mafia, there's no guarantee you're ascetic. You cc'ing Eager could have been a gambit where you lied as easily as one where you have a mafia PR.
Even your speculation of what could and couldn't be in this game is overly confident.
Slightly less frequently than town, but not by a statistically significant margin. It is not a tell either way.In post 2794, nn30 wrote:@Implosion - In your experience, how often do scum play the 'here's what I think you should do when I flip town' card.
I want to call these really bad suggestions and suggest that my town read on NN wavered slightly for it. But that might be overreaction on my part because I'm tired and grumpy from driving 9 hours.In post 2769, nn30 wrote:
Confirming what we think we know would be a good start. So, Zoronos would be a good idea - though you're risking scum killing Zoro and you getting nothing useful here.
Same logic goes for shadow - though if he is ascetic, we still won't know his alignment. In a world where I could guarantee my investigation working, I'd go for Zoro over Shadow since it's more likely to turn up something useful.
I would much rather lynch Grendel.In post 2757, boring wrote:As I've said before, I'm willing to vote Dierfire if we can't lynch Shadow today. If you're willing to vote Dierfire too, then I guess we'll have our five.