NY 198: Nexus is Now a New Normal Mafia (Game Over)


Locked
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #14 (isolation #0) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:30 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Thank you mr mod for linking the game in the pm this is all a player can ask for
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #15 (isolation #1) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:31 pm

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: RB
Cuz he claimed scum + wagontime thanks
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:33 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 8, Aeronaut wrote:Dang, you caught me
In post 12, TwoFace wrote:Dang you caught us
Actually no, this.

This is one guy mimicking another guy.
There's no need to mimic unless you don't know how you should be acting.
The only reason you wouldn't know how you should be acting is if you're scum.

This is much better.

Plus also I don't wanna look at that avi for 2 months so
VOTE: TwoFace

Pedit: Same hello
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #35 (isolation #3) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:48 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 26, Transcend wrote:I like Zulfy

He's my scum wrecking buddy
Mang I hardly recognized you with that new avi.

Blink twice if they gave you a gun again :D
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #38 (isolation #4) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:52 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:Zulfy plz don't act super scummy
Is this a commentary on me as a human being or a commentary on the two posts I had made hitherto?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #43 (isolation #5) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:57 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 29, Transcend wrote:Well actually he's my not lynching my hard town read when he was L-1 buddy
What else could ya ask for

Anyway mr TwoFace, simply make direct eye contact with my vote on you and I shall remove it.

Pedit: I don't know if I can watch you relapsing like this, KTS.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #46 (isolation #6) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:02 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 44, TwoFace wrote: I don't care about votes on me.
This is either a softclaim (doubt that)
Or you being the person you've shown yourself to be so far (egh)
Either way please wagon everyone thank you.

September 16, 2016
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #47 (isolation #7) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:03 pm

Post by Zulfy »

September 01*
Excuse me my avi is having Effects on me.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #56 (isolation #8) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:08 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 49, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 38, Zulfy wrote:
In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:Zulfy plz don't act super scummy
Is this a commentary on me as a human being or a commentary on the two posts I had made hitherto?
Your LyLo play in Open 654 was bad and it need to be reinforced as such
Maan

I was doing plane things 80% of that time
I was sleeping the other 15%
It was the shitty newt guy not me.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #57 (isolation #9) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:09 pm

Post by Zulfy »

So far TwoFace has only argued on the internet instead of playing the game.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #63 (isolation #10) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:13 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Plane sleep I said.
But sure fine whatever.

@KTS I think TwoFace is a newbie and was prepared to cut him some slack for a bit there.

Pedit: hmm
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #66 (isolation #11) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:15 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Explain how it's a misrep. With only your intellect and keyboard elevate this discussion.
Or just keep barking woof woof up to you

I suppose the same goes to RB.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #73 (isolation #12) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:18 pm

Post by Zulfy »

No need for the dichotomy I can do both one sec.

Pedit: Pra Frente
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #83 (isolation #13) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:24 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 27, TwoFace wrote:
In post 24, Killthestory wrote:RVS is over. There's only two acceptable people to vote for.
No it's not. Even if it were somehow over, people are allowed to rvs.

Didn't you just say you were going to stop doing dumb shit? That's not working out very well
In post 31, TwoFace wrote:
Well 1. You would have to have imposing stature. You don't.

2. You'd have to be right about me that I'm scum. You aren't.

So if you're town, go sit at the kiddie table while the grown ups play the game.
In post 33, TwoFace wrote:
Somebody hear something? Meh must be the wind
In post 36, TwoFace wrote:
*Image*
In post 40, TwoFace wrote:Funny since I haven't even been defensive yet. But thanks for proving you're a crappy player. No respectable player plays the defensive card anymore.

I can ignore you the remainder of the game.
In post 44, TwoFace wrote:
In post 43, Zulfy wrote:Anyway mr TwoFace, simply make direct eye contact with my vote on you and I shall remove it.
I don't care about votes on me. Leave it if you want.
That's the meat of it. The bolded shit is Completely Useless Poop, it's like a third of the stuff he wrote. The rest is unimpressive.

My shade is justified.
Pedit: You playing is not indicative of you playing well.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #87 (isolation #14) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:27 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 64, rb wrote:@twoface: is that misrep scummy?
Answer your pal's question, pal.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #95 (isolation #15) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:31 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 85, rb wrote:telling someone they're playing shit is just as useless as the someone playing shit, get over it

is twoface scum or is he shit, the other stuff is irrelevant
a) Yea I suppose. Pedit: I suppose quite a bit.
b) Twoface is being
sorted
atm, you see. He is not shit, that's mean.

But hey more boats. Has KTS hopped on?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #97 (isolation #16) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:32 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 75, TwoFace wrote:
In post 64, rb wrote:^ agree zulfy's post is yuck

@twoface: is that misrep scummy?
Too early to tell. But just cause I'm not playing the way he would like me to doesn't mean I'm not playing the game.
Oh yea.
See I was so eager to make that snipe that I missed the rest apologies.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #100 (isolation #17) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:34 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 75, TwoFace wrote:Too early to tell.
You argued past me! And I fell for it!

Thank you for answering the guy but now:
How is that a misrep? I'm still stuck in this elevator, sir.

Pedit: Don't make fun of me :{
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #107 (isolation #18) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:38 pm

Post by Zulfy »

This is the thing by the way, for those of you just joining us.
In post 62, TwoFace wrote:
In post 57, Zulfy wrote:So far TwoFace has only argued on the internet instead of playing the game.
Misrep
Nevermind I think it's been answered while we were chatting: this is how you play and I should get over it.
Ugghhhh

Good night.

Pedit: You're allowed to back off things, rb.
Pedit2: No rb, my game has not been baseless. I had a Stance, shared it with you, and then you disregarded it and I said I suppose, but that does not nullify the Stance I initially had. Please remember that time is linear.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #108 (isolation #19) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:39 pm

Post by Zulfy »

The lesson we learned tonight is that arguing on the internet is an invalid form of playing this game but a form of playing this game nonetheless.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #115 (isolation #20) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:43 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 109, rb wrote:i think ur talking to the wrong person tbh since i never said i suppose anything
I think you read my Thing wrong
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #120 (isolation #21) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:46 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 117, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 108, Zulfy wrote:The lesson we learned tonight is that arguing on the internet is an invalid form of playing this game but a form of playing this game nonetheless.
Seems like you're acknowledging you made a lot of noise that led nowhere. You sound defeated.
I'm just being dialectical.
As we all should be.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #142 (isolation #22) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:57 pm

Post by Zulfy »

One thing for

@TWOFACE

Hey man what do you hope to gain by being dismissive and vindictive? Reactions? Telling emotional outbursts?

And rb

Same question and perhaps doubly so.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #147 (isolation #23) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:59 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 137, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 121, rb wrote:
In post 117, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 108, Zulfy wrote:The lesson we learned tonight is that arguing on the internet is an invalid form of playing this game but a form of playing this game nonetheless.
Seems like you're acknowledging you made a lot of noise that led nowhere. You sound defeated.
vote zulfy with me already my god
I'm not SR at the moment. To be honest, that try hard vote on TF while bad, did get us out of RVS very quickly and I don't think scum would purposefully try to get the town out of that stage as quickly as we did.
I
was the elevator all along!
rb give an example when you did this.

One example, a singular example of you doing what this man is saying I did today here.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #296 (isolation #24) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:05 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 189, Pine wrote: Right now the only partial read I have is of you, rb, because you're the only one actually explaining yourself.
What

Hey man what about
me
?
What about KTS?
What about uhh yea I guess that's it.
In post 190, Pine wrote:Sorry, that was half a post. My vote's on KTS right now because of the blatantly scummy antics described above. Granted, they're displayed by lots of players so far, but it's most pronounced with KTS. Bullying and browbeating are inherently scummy and antisocial, so I'd like to see him gone. It's a pretty weak read too, because I've seen Town do this on numerous occasions as well.
You can literally say the exact same thing about rb
and perhaps twoface a bit.

And kraska made this point also but I see:
In post 196, Transcend wrote:
In post 192, kraska77 wrote:
In post 184, Pine wrote:but being a bullying asshole is not a valid way to play a social game.
..........what?
Are u sure uve for the right person here? Rb's play is fine and dandy but kts is a "bullying asshole"? Lol is this rb buddying?

stop being a scumfuck
where's the scumfuckerry?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #298 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:13 am

Post by Zulfy »

Ughhhhh I had other stuff also but chrome immediately closed out when I bumped my finger on the x button.
One sec here
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #300 (isolation #26) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:17 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 137, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 121, rb wrote:
In post 117, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 108, Zulfy wrote:The lesson we learned tonight is that arguing on the internet is an invalid form of playing this game but a form of playing this game nonetheless.
Seems like you're acknowledging you made a lot of noise that led nowhere. You sound defeated.
vote zulfy with me already my god
I'm not SR at the moment. To be honest, that try hard vote on TF while bad, did get us out of RVS very quickly and I don't think scum would purposefully try to get the town out of that stage as quickly as we did.
In post 214, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm in agreement with Pine on that it's impossible to get even a weak town read on anyone right now and it's probably going to be like that for a while.

I'm going to go with my gut here and UNVOTE:

VOTE: Zulfy

Every single one of his posts reads very off to me. It's like he has some sort of hidden agenda that doesn't seem to be in the best interest of the town.
Tell me how the read progressed.
Give me a post of mine that seems off to you and why it seems off.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #301 (isolation #27) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:19 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 233, rb wrote:
In post 230, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, rb wrote:TwoFace: who's scum and who's town. Top2 of each.
Couldn't tell ya. Don't have any reads yet. It's way too early.
wow what a casual
You'd be bouncing off the walls if this post was someone else, rb.
Why ya warming up to twoface?
+1
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #302 (isolation #28) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:28 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 297, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 202, Transcend wrote:shadow he plays like this as either alignment

also if you thought kts might have been living up to his scum meta, how come you didn't jump on the forming bandwagon on him?

VOTE: Shadow_step
This looks OK
VOTE: Shadow Step
How do you feel about shadow_step 's response?
In post 229, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 202, Transcend wrote:shadow he plays like this as either alignment

also if you thought kts might have been living up to his scum meta, how come you didn't jump on the forming bandwagon on him?

VOTE: Shadow_step
Which is why I asked Dav why he thought kts was town based on a "recent game", if his town and scum games were so radically different it would be too easy which generally isn't the case.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #303 (isolation #29) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:29 am

Post by Zulfy »

I would not lick my lips at an rb wagon because my lips are extremely chapped but that's something I could go for
Also pine though, I feel there'd be much less resistance there.

VOTE: Pine
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #304 (isolation #30) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:29 am

Post by Zulfy »

That was directed @ JJD
With a bit of a nod to Zach
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #319 (isolation #31) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:14 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 316, Shadow_step wrote:I've never seen Zulfy post so much, what prompted this zulfy?
I will have zero utility in this game if I'm not engrossed in it, as this is a large and I am only playing cuz Zach is playing.
If I am to withdraw even for a bit I will come back apathetic and that's not something I want. Gotta be diligent in everything you do.
Also I don't even know you I thought I was playing with Shadoweh who is this

@JJD, we've only played two games together I think and you were scum in one, correct? What have I done for you to assess me as a weird player?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #320 (isolation #32) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:14 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 318, Gamma Emerald wrote:Zulfy actually seems pretty towny
Why do you suppose pine and rb and twoface and that other guy disagree?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #321 (isolation #33) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:15 am

Post by Zulfy »

Lil Uzi
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #323 (isolation #34) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:23 am

Post by Zulfy »

In what way did I act weird in the game(s) we played together
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #327 (isolation #35) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:35 am

Post by Zulfy »

Is the 'eh' your response to my question or your reaction to my apparent stream-of-consciousness writing?

Not really trying to be stream of consciousness by the way but I wasn't about to clicking and clacking trying to find Vert's name.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #329 (isolation #36) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:37 am

Post by Zulfy »

Who do you mean by 'him'? me or one of the people I mentioned?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #332 (isolation #37) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:41 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 324, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 320, Zulfy wrote:
In post 318, Gamma Emerald wrote:Zulfy actually seems pretty towny
Why do you suppose pine and rb and twoface and that other guy disagree?
You seem stream-of-conciousness
eh
@TF: this and I like some of his posts, like his third.
alright so you're saying my alleged SoC writing makes you townread me more?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #336 (isolation #38) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:45 am

Post by Zulfy »

Okay yea great everything seems in order.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #337 (isolation #39) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:47 am

Post by Zulfy »

TF post your best possible scumhunting startinnnnng now go go go
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #339 (isolation #40) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:50 am

Post by Zulfy »

It would appear you don't work at all.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #353 (isolation #41) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:06 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 344, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
@Zulfy:
I reread. Last night, some of your posts did read off to me, but I thought I was reading too deep and considering how late I was up last night, I just decided to sleep on it and do a reread in the morning. Which I did. And your posts still read off to me.

Your vote for TF for example where you say one doesn't have a reason to mimic others unless they're scum isn't true. Town do as well, especially players who are new to mafia, don't know what to do, or just have a play style that leads them to being very unconfident and unsure a lot of time. Not saying this is the case for TF, but in general I don't find mimicking scummy and the fact that you felt strongly about it to the point where you made it the reason for your first serious vote pinged me a bit despite how try hard it felt.

As well as your interactions with him. You don't believe TF is playing well and your only support for this is that you bold a bunch of things in his ISO that imply he's posting filler when several other players at the time could have been accused of the same. I'd argue you could go through anyone's ISO right now and accuse them of posting only filler. Your case on him is very weak and it doesn't even read like you find him scummy, you just seem like you wep pointing it out in hopes someone else latches on.

And then just the way you say things. It's like a character you're trying to put on. It may be that you're just weird like this in general as Jar had pointed out and I might have to just accept that but my gut keeps nagging me about it at the moment.
I will make no apologies for being try hard. It got me a good score on my ACT and helped me win all my kickball games.

I jumped on what I had to jump on and the gamestate has benefitted for it. Perhaps you are right about the NaI nature of mimicry but TF's uselessness (which is unparalleled by anyone else who continues posting, I am sure others agree here) is what keeps my vote on him.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #354 (isolation #42) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:07 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Pine pls respond to any of the points JJD has made on you
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #355 (isolation #43) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:12 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Zach back me up or tear me down here.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #359 (isolation #44) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:28 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Oh yea it's on pine.
It's on you in spirit
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #360 (isolation #45) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:30 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 294, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 293, Pine wrote:KTS was bullying and abusing people who disagreed.
Please point out specific examples.
In post 299, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 295, drealmerz7 wrote:jarjar, you sound like you're trolling
Nope. I'd very much like him to point out the specific posts that led him to vote for KTS. Just a blanket "He's scum cuz he's overconfident in his reads" is a garbage reason.
No u didnt Pine
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #363 (isolation #46) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:32 pm

Post by Zulfy »

no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #364 (isolation #47) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:33 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 356, TwoFace wrote:explaining why I disagree with things.
Literally only saying 'no thats not it' is not a useful explanation.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #371 (isolation #48) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:38 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 365, TwoFace wrote:
In post 350, TwoFace wrote:Scumreads without reasons are the only one I'd probably disagree with completely. The rest is antitown but nai. That's why I'm just ignoring him. I'm pretty sure I've played with him or read a game he was in and noticed he wasn't good.
Except this isn't an example of that. Why u keep misrepping me?
Who said I said this was an example of anything??

Anyone can click on ISO next to ur name and see what I mean.

Pedit: cuz I don't buy the authenticity of his push and also others want him dead and I can compromise.

Pedit2: one sec
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #372 (isolation #49) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:39 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 370, TwoFace wrote:More examples of me explaining myself.
In post 264, TwoFace wrote:
In post 260, JarJarDrinks wrote:this too since it's sheeping a bad post.
it's not sheeping a bad post actually. It's letting him know that his warning was too late because the person he was warning had already acted scummy
In post 268, TwoFace wrote:
In post 266, JarJarDrinks wrote:His "warning" wasn't a warning. It was an implication that Zulfys previous post was scummy. Therefore you saying that you also thought it was scummy was a sheep. And since I don't think that his post was scummy, it was sheeping a bad post.
really? It didn't read to me like that, I read it as a warning. Well his post was scummy so if I was indeed sheeping his post, I was sheeping a good one not a bad one.
In post 356, TwoFace wrote:Funny you say I'm not being useful yet I'm asking questions, pointing out things I disagree with, explaining why I disagree with things. Most people consider that playing the game yet for some reason you don't. Obviously if you're town you don't know what usefulness looks like.
Hey child I never said you weren't explaining yourself only that you were explaining yourself badly.

It''s valid we've been over that but uhh

It lacks use-value
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #404 (isolation #50) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:17 pm

Post by Zulfy »

why
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #406 (isolation #51) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:21 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 404, Zulfy wrote:why
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #418 (isolation #52) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:49 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 104, rb wrote:z
ulfy's game has been as baseless as he accuses yours of being
and he's determined to throw as much shade as possible early game + his RVS feels fake as fuck
In post 385, TwoFace wrote:Misrepping isn't a wacky reason.
Being useless by complaining about somebody else being useless
isn't a wacky reason.
Not sure how to feel about this continued mimicry alignment-wise.
Heh
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #419 (isolation #53) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:51 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Also an observation will always have more value than a trait.
My observation of your uselessness is inherently superior to your simple uselessness. But that's another story whatevs
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #420 (isolation #54) » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:52 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Ya know what TwoFace you're probs town :(
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #765 (isolation #55) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:33 am

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: Shadow_step

JJD was not tunneling and his read was not shit
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #779 (isolation #56) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:26 am

Post by Zulfy »

Kraska's self-hammer looks so much like someone frustrated that they are getting bussed.

That would obviously point to rb tho and I can't see him bussing two days in a row.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #780 (isolation #57) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:26 am

Post by Zulfy »

Self-vote*
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #782 (isolation #58) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:32 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 733, rb wrote:hyper inactive on day1, comes into day2 "hey guyz let's kill the bussing scum!" right after it's suggested by Uzi. okay dood
Shadow had this stance during Day 1 twilight.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #783 (isolation #59) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:34 am

Post by Zulfy »

To clarify shadow wanted drealmerz dead before Day 1 ended it had nothin to do with Uzi like rb supposes here.

Either a mistake or misrepresentation both not so hot.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #784 (isolation #60) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:36 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 739, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 733, rb wrote:i can see no better lynch than shadow today - this slot isn't going to sort itself with anything less than a flip.

hyper inactive on day1, comes into day2 "hey guyz let's kill the bussing scum!" right after it's suggested by Uzi. okay dood
nice misrep :lol: :lol:
In post 690, Shadow_step wrote:Dreamerlz whatever that username is needs death tomorrow.
In post 741, rb wrote:
In post 739, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 733, rb wrote:i can see no better lynch than shadow today - this slot isn't going to sort itself with anything less than a flip.

hyper inactive on day1, comes into day2 "hey guyz let's kill the bussing scum!" right after it's suggested by Uzi. okay dood
nice misrep :lol: :lol:
In post 690, Shadow_step wrote:Dreamerlz whatever that username is needs death tomorrow.
so you didn't read the game @ all but decided to latch onto the easy-target 'policy-lyncher' - even though he policy lynched someone self-voting and giving up, who also flipped scum.

yer, fuck off ur IQ is above 80 so you don't actually believe this is the best play for today
Ooh I missed this??
Fair enough yea nvm.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #785 (isolation #61) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:38 am

Post by Zulfy »

As far as mu vote on the manwhich is what I was looking for:
In post 719, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 717, rb wrote:i also can't see you keeping an rvs vote for 28 pages
I wasn't bothered at all tbh, I was put off by the amount of crappy posts NAI posts in the thread and stopped reading after a point.
This attitude seems unreasonable
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #787 (isolation #62) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:50 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 508, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 400, rb wrote:There's not really anything wrong with TF or Pine's early game play.

They lack conclusions and conviction, but anyone who thinks that's the only things that benefit town in the early game is simply wrong. A good early game often comprises mostly of questioning and simply interacting and getting interactions out of people.
How is pine doing any of those things
Some context^
In post 576, JarJarDrinks wrote:
rb wrote:Note that I'm posting a fuckton, but if you read my ISO you'll see that I pressured Pine about why he wasn't doing that.
And if you read my ISO, you'll see that I commented on the fact that you pressured him about why he wasn't doing something that you earlier said he was doing
rb wrote:You can also note that I never said Pine WAS saying of those things
GET THE FUCK OUT!!!

That's EXACTLY what you were doing with this post
Spoiler:
In post 400, rb wrote:There's not really anything wrong with TF or Pine's early game play.

They lack conclusions and conviction, but anyone who thinks that's the only things that benefit town in the early game is simply wrong. A good early game often comprises mostly of questioning and simply interacting and getting interactions out of people.

People are being lambasted with accusations of being shit - that needs to stop from everyone. If something is scummy, fine. Don't just blanket someone as shit because it's not alignment related.


rb wrote:but I expected him to start and when he didn't - I asked him why and pressured him.
Why did you expect him to start?
Is there some reason you thought he was town? If not then why defend him?


VOTE: RB Sorry Trans, I think ur wrong here
Do you suppose this is some sort of scumslip JarJar, do you suppose rb is talking about Pine as if he knows for sure he's town?

You said in our first game together something similar about me and I was town and you were scum in that game.
I know you read rb as scum earlier also would just like a response from both rb and JJD regarding this.

rb you always just insult and pivot but do this please.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #790 (isolation #63) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:54 am

Post by Zulfy »

I bolded and enlarged the question you ignored
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #793 (isolation #64) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 10:00 am

Post by Zulfy »

My style gets people's goats sometimes, I've seen.
I don't mind it though, Uzi's read and rb's read will change if they are reasonable people. Twoface's probs won't but he doesn't seem very reasonable and that's not necessarily scummy in his case.

Uhh yea pretty much that.

Pedit: ok
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #819 (isolation #65) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 10:26 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 795, rb wrote:i must be missing what you're trying to get at here. even if he was scum id expect that his style would have him start doing that because scum are trying to look town as well. me expecting that has nothing to do with alignment.

@Zulfy: so you don't think Shadow is scum or a reasonable lynch? How come?
I do tho:
EBWOQ this quote
In post 785, Zulfy wrote:As far as my vote on the man, which is what I was looking for:
In post 719, Shadow_step wrote:
In post 717, rb wrote:i also can't see you keeping an rvs vote for 28 pages
I wasn't bothered at all tbh, I was put off by the amount of crappy posts NAI posts in the thread and stopped reading after a point.
This attitude seems unreasonable
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #820 (isolation #66) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 10:28 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 814, Gamma Emerald wrote:Dreal is acting a little too weird rn
I am not seeing these dots you're connecting.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #864 (isolation #67) » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:56 pm

Post by Zulfy »

That's why you always post some random stuff every so often so you can delete your way to a pagetop.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #904 (isolation #68) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 5:44 am

Post by Zulfy »

VOTE: Uzi
Blocked u haha
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #910 (isolation #69) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 5:51 am

Post by Zulfy »

I guarantee ya Uzi said the words "me" and "don't see" and "suspicion"
But he was wrong. And now lynchbait drealmerz is conftown too.
Scum got its shit fucked and I'm sorry.
Role blocker.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #967 (isolation #70) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:54 am

Post by Zulfy »

Hey mr rb stop hemming and hawing before we eat all the cheese.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #968 (isolation #71) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:55 am

Post by Zulfy »

I would like the lack of night kill explained if Uzi is not scum, can anyone do that?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #990 (isolation #72) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:20 am

Post by Zulfy »

In post 970, Pine wrote:Doctor could easily explain it. Hush, his result is a lot more probable than yours.
Doctor should claim if that's the case.

My result somehow becomes less "probable" due to rb's claim???
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #991 (isolation #73) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:24 am

Post by Zulfy »

Come on my boy why'd you suddenly clam up?
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #992 (isolation #74) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:24 am

Post by Zulfy »

@rb
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #993 (isolation #75) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:57 pm

Post by Zulfy »

I was wondering why this whole thing was so muted but then uh
yea Thanksgiving happy that everyone.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1009 (isolation #76) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:09 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 1005, Pine wrote:Waiting on RB, let's talk Bethesda games!

I downloaded Skyrim SE when it came out (I got it free because I have all the DLC for the original) but I don't play it. It's still kind of buggy on my laptop, and there are some mods that haven't been recreated that I'm too attached to.
omg what's ur modlist

I have interesting npcs and immersive armors and inigo and arissa cuz that's all my laptop could handle and now no longer can.
And civil war overhaul which glitched right when things were getting good.

And also sofia but that is such a shit mod after a week that I lost track of where she went.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1037 (isolation #77) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:36 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Doc still hasn't claimed so my vote on Uzi remains.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1041 (isolation #78) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:30 pm

Post by Zulfy »

hmmm
VOTE: davesaz
fine
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1042 (isolation #79) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:36 pm

Post by Zulfy »

There's always the possibility that there is no doc though, and that would mean scum has a credible fakeclaim to fall back on if Doc doesn't claim today.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1043 (isolation #80) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:53 pm

Post by Zulfy »

Though if there is no doc that would mean
a) Uzi is scum and failed to kill whoever he tried to kill. (This would make rb's claim suspect if bussing two partners right away wasn't such a ludicrous theory)
b) scum didn't nk on purpose to draw out a claim (in which case they succeeded, and davesaz is def scum)

And if there is that means my targeting of uzi was entirely meaningless and
a) davesaz is motivated doc which looking at the wiki plus what rb said, can't be the case so nevermind this
b) doc saved rb or kts when davesaz targeted one of these people


Well yea Zulfy so fuckin what

well:
It can't be me I'm rb (heh)
It can't be rb he's JOAT
It can't be Uzi he got blocked
It can't be drealmerz cuz he's IC
It could be KTS if scum shot rb and KTS saved him.
In post 907, TwoFace wrote:VOTE: uzi
In post 911, Zachstralkita wrote:VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert


that connect u rap about is wifi, you aint never really even seen a trap
In post 917, Gamma Emerald wrote:So drealmerz is an IC? Cool.
VOTE: LUV
In post 921, JarJarDrinks wrote:Oh I get to play this phase? neat.

Intent
to vote Uzi but not sure if he's @ L-1 right now.
In post 924, Pine wrote: Intent to vote LUV
None of these people are the doc either
Because if they were the doc they would know there is the possibility that they saved the person they targetted.
And wouldn't be so quick to vote someone mere posts after my claim.

People in the running to become NY 198's next top doctor:
drealmerz7

LmkGuy
Gamma Emerald

davesaz

Pine

Zulfy

Zachstralkita

Killthestory
RB

TwoFace

Lil Uzi Vert

JarJarDrinks

Scum has a 50/50 shot.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1044 (isolation #81) » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:56 pm

Post by Zulfy »

In post 994, LmkGuy wrote:Hey all, just subbed into this game during the last night phase. Haven't had a chance to read up on the whole thread, but probably about half way through it now. I'll keep up to date with the current posts, but until I finish reading the rest of the thread, my reads will be based off current events.

Seems like this game is heading fast towards end game, but right now I am extremely interested (as most people are) to find out who RB was onto last night.

Anyway, going to continue reading and will post asap. If you have any questions you would like me to answer, go ahead and ask :)
Plausible doctor. Comes into the thread and sees rb as a strong player so very likely would protect rb.

KTS should get in here and say things once he's done eating his cereal.
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1101 (isolation #82) » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:10 pm

Post by Zulfy »

$_$
no investigation no right to speak
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #1165 (isolation #83) » Mon Nov 28, 2016 7:48 am

Post by Zulfy »

What's the récord for fastest large normal?
no investigation no right to speak
Locked

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”