That quote directly says that you have to do more to earn the vote and that's it's not a given. It's directly telling you that convincing me that something BV did Day 5 was scummy was likely a waste of time and giving you clear goals telling you what I'm looking for. Nothing about that says that I'm autovoting outside you.In post 3167, nn30 wrote:@Prism - if I'm the last remaining scum and I read this from a townie:In post 3166, Prism wrote:To flip this back, if you're town, you're not realizing that my vote is not a given in your favor. That post didn't eventryto consider me as town, which is weird as fuck for someone who supposedly shared my sentiment that you had to be town.
I'd say 'yeah mean, I'm town look at me! oooohhhh look how scummy BV is!'In post 3149, Prism wrote:In post 3148, Prism wrote:The only thing scummy from BV so far to me is what I stated above so this 3 way is a lot more about either convincing me you're town or convincing me Shadow showed he was scum.
And then I'd take that check and cash it at the bank for a free Win.
By creating my best scum case on you, I've taken that olive branch and thrown it to the ground. I'm taking the path of least resistance and, frankly, you should be town reading me for it.
Your above quote DOES mean that if I wanted to I could have taken your vote on BV for granted. I didn't do that.
I hadn't fully caught up with the game yet and had just voted based off the first post I didn't like. I got my Implosion scumread (just explained a bit of it to BV) and went for it with full force. As far as LUV goes, again may I direct you to Day 2 where I powertunneled LUV and boring tried to discredit my read on LUV without actually removing herself from the wagon. My vote on Eager was due to me also thinking that two town ascetics was unlikely (thinking Eager flipped scum ascetic and assumed he was the only one). I made it clear that I thought that either Eager was scum or bothIn post 3167, nn30 wrote:@BV - Take a look back at Prism's ISO. His first post of the game 488 is a vote for Boring, then his second post of the game (591) contains a weak walk back on his scum read of Boring, possible FoS on LUV, and a vote for Implosion.
For him to enter the game, peg two scum in the way that he did, and end up on the Eager wagon (1042) is bizarre.
This isn't true at all.In post 3167, nn30 wrote:He began D3 with a fairly strong scum read on Boring (2278). Yet, directly following that vote, he spends 2336 a lot 2338 of time 2421 and energy 2423 on other people 2472 until finally he switches over to Grendel 2545.
The chain of posts I just linked to were in chronological order starting with his vote for Boring in 2278 and ended with his vote on Grendel in 2545.
For somebody who felt strong enough to vote for Boring, he didn't spend a whole lot of time trying to gather votes onto her. He mostly just argues with other people about unrelated things.
#2236 is almost entirely dedicated to boring, with only the first and last quotes being unrelated. The rest is all me questioning/explaining my read to boring, telling
#2238 was purposely separated from #2236, people were pushing you over boring and I wanted to make it clear I wasn't going to go along. "Thank god for Implosion" is also referencing him coming back and voting boring, because nobody else was agreeing with me until he rolled in 3-4 posts before.
#2421 also dedicates significant time towards explaining more of my scumread on her to boring and more convincing Zoronos boring is mafia. The only thing unrelated is me trying to convince Shadow to stop tunneling you...again so he'll vote boring.
#2423 is a direct response to Shadow and
#2472 is the only one completely unrelated and it was to give Shadow an ego check because he was making it impossible to work with him, and the posts that
I'm not going to dispute that my Grendel read was off the mark, he was the first person I got a chance to reread between him and Dierfire and I found a shit ton I didn't like, and it wound up costing us a lot, and that's my fault. I've been the first to own up to me likely costing us the win that day and have listed it
YouIn post 3167, nn30 wrote:This line of play could obviously come from town. But... the more I read it the more it feels scummy to me.