Mafiascum.net

ISO · Post **#825** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:27 pm

VOTE: Pepchoninga

I think this is a slightly better wagon than Anotora although I'm still reasonably okay with both being scum.

ISO · Post **#826** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:28 pm

In post 820, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 818, Srceenplay wrote:
In post 811, Frozen Angel wrote:@everyone else I asked grey why he was townreading me cause during me - garmr intercation he was repeatedly poking - accusing me of hidden knowledge (which I suspect was for provoking Garmr there) then he announced a town lean on me right after that when people called it a TvT and I backed of from my Garmr push.

His reads are not based on play- their based on momentum and general view.

pedit : Till now I was trying to get answers from you mainly. Now that I know you have nothing I will try to get votes on you. don't worry.

Ok

I fell like grey is pushing you and you are getting defensive.
Why are you bothered?
Do you think he is making a legitimate case or dumb case.

Opinions

ISO · Post **#827** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:28 pm

Would you like to chime in any more than that, Srceenplay?

ISO · Post **#828** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:28 pm

In post 822, Anotora wrote:That's a scummy explanation when it comes from someone who almost always uses preview-edits.

what the hell are you talking about? I wasn't online at all when he unvoted first. I skimmed the not read pages which was the same reason I mistkaed about the first crap he calls a lie as well and I saw RC unvoting again - so I assumed when pacho pushed for a claim on you you were at L1 naturally.

how is preview-edit related to this at all?

ISO · Post **#829** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:28 pm

In post 823, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 674, RadiantCowbells wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 736, RadiantCowbells wrote:UNVOTE:

:thinking:

As you yourself JUST POINTED OUT, he WASN'T VOTING ANYONE when he unvoted in 736.

ISO · Post **#830** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:28 pm

Oops. Post inside quotes.

ISO · Post **#831** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:30 pm

In post 825, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Pepchoninga

I think this is a slightly better wagon than Anotora although I'm still reasonably okay with both being scum.

Yeah but I'm thinking About is a d3 consideration.

Once Pepto flips red, I'm going balls to the wall to lynch fa over her desperation chainsaw today.

ISO · Post **#832** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:31 pm

In post 831, -Grey- wrote:
In post 825, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Pepchoninga

I think this is a slightly better wagon than Anotora although I'm still reasonably okay with both being scum.

Yeah but I'm thinking Anotora is a d3 consideration.

Once Pepto flips red, I'm going balls to the wall to lynch fa over her desperation chainsaw today.

Edit

ISO · Post **#833** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:31 pm

Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

ISO · Post **#834** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:32 pm

In post 813, -Grey- wrote:
In post 811, Frozen Angel wrote:His reads are not based on play- their based on momentum and general view.

Lie #4

I'm the one that stopped the momentum against Anotora.
There is no general view that Frozen Angel is scum.

She's desperate to discredit me because I'm pushing her buddy.

Kinda don't have much time to read everything with thought, but I saw this.

No, I don't think she is lying. Your votes are really based on general view. You don't really search for any good evidence in the behavior of people you just kinda lynch them out of nowhere. You change reads every page without really saying why. Honestly your inconsistencies has now started to double and this is never good for something that is thinking of himself as a town.

ISO · Post **#835** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:33 pm

grey is throwing mud on me and when I questioned the background of his reads he started to make a loop. He is scum for having reads that have no background.

vote him or attack my logic.

pedit : I DIDN'T KNOW he wasn't voting anyone when he unvoted in 736, I missed his first unvote before pep push for claim. Thats why I was thinking anotora was at L1 when he asked for claim.

and my scumread on you has no relation to anotora or pep. nice desperate throwing shade though.

ISO · Post **#836** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:33 pm

In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

Care to actually explain your vote? Your been lurking a bit recently.

ISO · Post **#837** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:35 pm

In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

RC are you reading my posts?

why are you ignoring me?

ISO · Post **#838** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:35 pm

In post 828, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 822, Anotora wrote:That's a scummy explanation when it comes from someone who almost always uses preview-edits.

what the hell are you talking about? I wasn't online at all when he unvoted first. I skimmed the not read pages which was the same reason I mistkaed about the first crap he calls a lie as well and I saw RC unvoting again - so I assumed when pacho pushed for a claim on you you were at L1 naturally.

how is preview-edit related to this at all?

I didn't push for a claim. I asked if he would do one. He was L-1 in and out and I don't know why anybody isn't talking about the inconsistent voting of RC.

ISO · Post **#839** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:35 pm

In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

She's chainsawing me because of my Pepto push.

Notice she had no problems with my weird play all day long... until after I started pushing her buddy.

ISO · Post **#840** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:36 pm

In post 838, Pepchoninga wrote:I didn't push for a claim. I asked if he would do one. He was L-1 in and out and I don't know why anybody isn't talking about the inconsistent voting of RC.

why you referred you're asking for a claim as a reaction test?

ISO · Post **#841** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:36 pm

In post 837, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

RC are you reading my posts?

why are you ignoring me?

I am reading your posts but I don't want to lynch you today despite your complete conformity to your scum meta because I don't want to lynch you today.

ISO · Post **#842** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:37 pm

In post 839, -Grey- wrote:
In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

She's chainsawing me because of my Pepto push.

Notice she had no problems with my weird play all day long... until after I started pushing her buddy.

You just started calling my posts lies. I just omgused you

- scum! nice bullcrap though - thumbs up

ISO · Post **#843** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:37 pm

In post 835, Frozen Angel wrote:grey is throwing mud on me and when I questioned the background of his reads he started to make a loop. He is scum for having reads that have no background.

Lie #6. My ISO shows time and again where I've caught you in direct lies and corrected them.

ISO · Post **#844** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 813, -Grey- wrote:
In post 811, Frozen Angel wrote:His reads are not based on play- their based on momentum and general view.

Lie #4

I'm the one that stopped the momentum against Anotora.
There is no general view that Frozen Angel is scum.

She's desperate to discredit me because I'm pushing her buddy.

Yes, you basically stopped a L-1 lynch from happening on the basis of like what? Seems like a scum trying to defend his buddy.

ISO · Post **#845** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:38 pm

I will be slightly lurking until tomorrow because I have things to do today.

Tomorrow I'll read everything and get a clearer picture of what's going on.

ISO · Post **#846** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:39 pm

In post 841, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 837, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

RC are you reading my posts?

why are you ignoring me?

I am reading your posts but I don't want to lynch you today despite your complete conformity to your scum meta because I don't want to lynch you today.

This post...

ISO · Post **#847** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:39 pm

In post 841, RadiantCowbells wrote:I am reading your posts but I don't want to lynch you today despite your complete conformity to your scum meta because I don't want to lynch you today.

I'm not scum and this is not my scum meta

but ok

VOTE: Frozen Angel

I'm voting myself instead of you. Like if thats what it takes to put aside whatever crap everyone are assuming about my meta - that makes playing mafia practically impossible and very annoying - then so be it.

Don't let grey go after me

I will prod doge from this point.

ISO · Post **#848** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:40 pm

In post 846, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 841, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 837, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 833, RadiantCowbells wrote:Chainsaw on who? Pepcho? where?

RC are you reading my posts?

why are you ignoring me?

I am reading your posts but I don't want to lynch you today despite your complete conformity to your scum meta because I don't want to lynch you today.

This post...

IE, I lynched FA in steven universe when I was confident she was scum and hated the rest of the game. FA lives for today at least.

ISO · Post **#849** (ISO) » Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:40 pm

and don't feel bad RC

I know this is just a game. but impossible is impossible.

I can't handle this anymore.

Mafiascum.net

Mini Normal 1866: Landmark Mafia! (Mafia Victory!)