In post 164, schadd_ wrote:yuh. {claim before catching up}{assert against the grain that there can be reasons to claim at l-2} rubs me the wrong way
In post 180, schadd_ wrote:GBT earns a bit of a townread just because they're posting very much a lot, not especially dense but not sparse either. at least, they are an especially confident scum player
In post 182, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:1. i mean for me i guess this is valid (i'm more of a quotestripper as scum based on my one game) but some people are good at faking this
2. is anything about my hyperposting genuine specifically?
3. also i think rasks's emotions are very townie, why would they be scummy?
In post 185, mattblackguy wrote:I'm not sure what to think about Creature at the moment. It seems he's being vague with all his posts, and can't get a read on him.
schadd_ wrote:In post 182, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:1. i mean for me i guess this is valid (i'm more of a quotestripper as scum based on my one game) but some people are good at faking this
2. is anything about my hyperposting genuine specifically?
3. also i think rasks's emotions are very townie, why would they be scummy?
numbers added
1. what's a quotestripper?![]()
2. uh, nothing in particular. there's just a bunch of stuff (almost a third of posts in the thread) and it's more that you haven't screwed up than that you have done anything remarkably genuine
3. i only emotions'd once, as scum. i think it's easy to fake, since people tend to sound silly when they're angry anyway. it surely depends on rask's precedent, tho
voting me is scummy (+some tone je ne sais quoi that i don't like)
In post 180, schadd_ wrote:
gayreen: agh, null. his only voting item was on me; newbie!clumsy!scumhunting is townie, voting me is scummy (+some tone je ne sais quoi that i don't like)
In post 190, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:oh matt i forgot to mention
i definitely think a pr would claim pr, getting lynched as provable town is way worse than nk'd
plus if he's scum and claims pr he can bait the real pr to claim (or get away with a fake-claim). you're kind of close with your logic here actually, a PR only shouldn't CC D1. Always claim your real role at L-1 (and are town) unless you absolutely know what you're doing
In post 187, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:schadd_ wrote:In post 182, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:1. i mean for me i guess this is valid (i'm more of a quotestripper as scum based on my one game) but some people are good at faking this
2. is anything about my hyperposting genuine specifically?
3. also i think rasks's emotions are very townie, why would they be scummy?
numbers added
1. what's a quotestripper?![]()
2. uh, nothing in particular. there's just a bunch of stuff (almost a third of posts in the thread) and it's more that you haven't screwed up than that you have done anything remarkably genuine
3. i only emotions'd once, as scum. i think it's easy to fake, since people tend to sound silly when they're angry anyway. it surely depends on rask's precedent, tho
1. Someone whose posts are usually long walls with bits of quotes and responses. Like if I write a big wall, a quotestripper would quote maybe each sentence or two and respond to it (or put a bunch of quotes in one post).
2..... how exactly would I "screw up"? like outright scumslip or
3. Really? Most people (especially tone readers) usually believe that some degree of emotion is possible to fake as scum, but usually you can tell if someone is being genuine if you know what to look for. Like Rask's emotions feel really natural and reasonable considering their contexts (his annoyance at me saying that his play was within his scumrange probably, his reaction to TB's claim) to me. Scum might react more... obviously? (like they might state "ugh i'm pissed that..." and not really show their emotions as much through tone)
In post 189, mattblackguy wrote:voting me is scummy (+some tone je ne sais quoi that i don't like)
Why was voting on you scummy? And what does the stuff in the parentheses mean?