2. GAYreenHamster
3. Shade
4. rakkar
5. schadd_
6. Raskolnikov (SE)
7. ThinkBig (SE)
8. gigabyteTroubadour (SE)
9. Creature (IC)
In post 295, Raskolnikov wrote:I remember them. both in the same game, actually. vedith claimed his PR d1 and got mislynched because he confused a no-result with a not-guilty. lycanfire said something akin to "x, y, z are scum. but never lynching these players: [entire scumteam]"
it sure was a massacre!
In post 290, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:post or perish (i say voting for the person out of the most active most likely to flip scum )
In post 213, Shade wrote:@Raskolnikov why you tried to put him in L1 if you didn't want him to claim?
GAYreenHamster was kinda opportunistic there as well but they didn't vote.
Thinkbig is not a newbie so if its known that people must claim after an intent on MS, him claiming there is actually scummy.
mattblackguy wrote:In post 290, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:post or perish (i say voting for the person out of the most active most likely to flip scum )
I don't really follow what you are saying here. Aren't the more active players more likely to be town, because contributing as town as a direct positive correlation to our goal? And aren't the players that are lurking, and not contributing much more likely to be scum, because they don't want to help the town figure out the puzzle? (sorry for my previous post, but I tried to post this 3 times and it wasn't going through!)
In post 303, Creature wrote:In post 295, Raskolnikov wrote:I remember them. both in the same game, actually. vedith claimed his PR d1 and got mislynched because he confused a no-result with a not-guilty. lycanfire said something akin to "x, y, z are scum. but never lynching these players: [entire scumteam]"
it sure was a massacre!
What game?
In post 308, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:but there's the fact
Creature wrote:Watch out with who's just inflating their post count.
In post 309, Creature wrote:Watch out with who's just inflating their post count.
In post 308, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:would
Raskolnikov wrote:hmmm
In post 323, Raskolnikov wrote:giga how do you interpret gayreen willingness to put think to l-1 without comment?
that and not that much info in general (though still more than think/rak) makes me not feel safe clearing him just yet