
In post 6, ThinkBig wrote:Everyone
3. Do you prefer to play town or mafia?
4. What is your favorite/least favorite role?
3. Mafia

4. wouldnt you like to know



VOTE: ThinkBig
In post 6, ThinkBig wrote:Everyone
3. Do you prefer to play town or mafia?
4. What is your favorite/least favorite role?
In post 54, Raskolnikov wrote:More often then not but I see creature get scumread a fair bit when he's town too.
In post 85, GAYreenHamster wrote:OK i'm here now, just got out of school, anyways, I came from PS! Mafia like gigabyteTroubadour did. So why is TB being lynched?
In post 6, ThinkBig wrote:4. What is your favorite/least favorite role?
In post 98, GAYreenHamster wrote:i dont exactly like how shadd_ lynched in left, if thats anything
In post 103, GAYreenHamster wrote:I mean, i guess it probably doesnt mean much in forum, but shadd_ just kinda lynched and stopped talking, and i just find it a lil susp, but thats about it :'D
In post 105, Creature wrote:I have 4 townreads, if you add me, it's 5v4.
GAYreenHamster wrote:Is it a bad idea to say who your townreads are, or are you guys just opting to not say them
In post 108, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:his questions were pretty legit for a newbie
mattblackguy wrote:In post 110, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:GAYreen (and any of the newer players here), have you read any games on here? It might be a good idea to see what's considered scummy/townie (if you don't already have a sense) or just get an idea of how a game usually goes.
Do you recommend any games in particular? I've read a little bit of day 1/day 2 from a game, but games are so long that it's hard to really read through a full game.
In post 116, schadd_ wrote:ye
schadd_ wrote:
yeah. or i could click on the thing on the right side of my screen. skull emoji
Creature wrote:Actually you have two townreads I don't townread.
In post 131, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: thinkbig L-1
GAYreenHamster wrote:wow, thanks rask
In post 136, Creature wrote:Okay, now I have 3 townreads.
GAYreenHamster wrote:Well, imma put him at L-1, if thats ok
Raskolnikov wrote:In post 127, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:i've townread some of your scumplay before so i don't really think it's a far-fetched conclusion though. i think the scum games of yours i remember was that Open with Lycanfire and that newbie with rXJr where i did have you as a townread in both
Okay that actually makes sense, sorry for lashing out at you about it then. Couldn't really have known that but whatevs
GAYreenHamster wrote:Giga its more of a pressure thing, but considering he is almost back, i let him explain a lil more when he gets here
In post 153, schadd_ wrote:feels too calculated to me
schadd_ wrote:we also definitely have less than 14 days
Creature wrote:Two players yet have to post...
Raskolnikov wrote:Thinkbig if you're actually town and just happened to check the thread via phone 10 minutes after I voted and overreacted based on an l-2 because you were on mobile and couldn't read and claimed because you didnt have time to respond because you weren't home yet and you also have your own personal theory that people should claim at l-2 without intent I've never heard about, I think I hate both you and my luck.
In post 158, Raskolnikov wrote:gigabyte has anyone ever compared you to aristo before?
GAYreenHamster wrote:i saw your guys' point giga and rask, i have been a little screwy with my lynching... Meh, not gonna put at L-1 without a reason
GAYreenHamster wrote:Ill be back, gtg have dinner
In post 180, schadd_ wrote:GBT earns a bit of a townread just because they're posting very much a lot, not especially dense but not sparse either. at least, they are an especially confident scum player
In post 185, mattblackguy wrote:I'm not sure what to think about Creature at the moment. It seems he's being vague with all his posts, and can't get a read on him.
schadd_ wrote:In post 182, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:1. i mean for me i guess this is valid (i'm more of a quotestripper as scum based on my one game) but some people are good at faking this
2. is anything about my hyperposting genuine specifically?
3. also i think rasks's emotions are very townie, why would they be scummy?
numbers added
1. what's a quotestripper?![]()
2. uh, nothing in particular. there's just a bunch of stuff (almost a third of posts in the thread) and it's more that you haven't screwed up than that you have done anything remarkably genuine
3. i only emotions'd once, as scum. i think it's easy to fake, since people tend to sound silly when they're angry anyway. it surely depends on rask's precedent, tho
In post 213, Shade wrote:Why would you vote someone to get them lynched, that soon in the game?
In post 213, Shade wrote:This means that you can be mafia as well? I was assuming it's 1 newbie/1 SE team, isn't it? [after reading 80 I guess not]
In post 213, Shade wrote:If there are several behaviors that are already known as scummy, why would any scum do them? Unless if you're saying a newbie might do them when they're scum which contradicts with your action - pointing them out to them.
Anyway as I said I have someone close who plays this so I know about some of these behaviors you're talking about.
In post 213, Shade wrote:Thinkbig is not a newbie so if its known that people must claim after an intent on MS, him claiming there is actually scummy.
In post 213, Shade wrote:What is the meaning of sheepy?
In post 213, Shade wrote:Their either mafia who claimed like that in first place or is really a Vanilla Town who is compromised to mafia. Going in other directions will probably help mafia in their PR haunt and I don't like that.
In post 202, GAYreenHamster wrote:Also, giga correct me if im wrong, but what you are implying is OMGUS, or lynching me because i lynched you
In post 225, Shade wrote:You said your vote was serious means you wanted to get them lynched. It's just hard to believe you got that strong feeling about a slot based on that post. I'm concerned about how fast you reached that state for being comfortable for saying your vote was serious not that you shouldn't have voted him.
Shade wrote:I actually try* that and sorry for grammatical errors.
I'm just tired.
In post 232, ThinkBig wrote:Hey all! I have off today and tomorrow (WOO HOO) so let me take some time to catch up!
In post 235, Creature wrote:So giga, why are you townreading schadd?
In post 242, Creature wrote:I'm kind of agreeing that rakkar + ThinkBig are scum, but I need to be prepared if one of them isn't scum.
In post 252, Shade wrote:Can you explain your line of thinking please? I really like to see how you will explain your reads.
Creature wrote:Oops GAYreen is in prod danger.
In post 270, Creature wrote:Because I think I think ThinkBig's claim was towny I think.
In post 272, Shade wrote:First if you know I'm going to question why you're voting me why you didn't answer that in the first place?
In post 280, Creature wrote:It'd be funny if three more players decided to vote Shade too.
In post 284, Raskolnikov wrote:Gigabyte was all paranoid earlier but switched to defending me?
In post 277, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:which is why i can't answer this or 4 at the second. mostly interested in schadd_ and matt's thoughts on your slot, and rakkar too.
Raskolnikov wrote:well now that's not true. people forget about these things all the time.
In post 213, Shade wrote:@Raskolnikov why you tried to put him in L1 if you didn't want him to claim?
GAYreenHamster was kinda opportunistic there as well but they didn't vote.
Thinkbig is not a newbie so if its known that people must claim after an intent on MS, him claiming there is actually scummy.
mattblackguy wrote:In post 290, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:post or perish (i say voting for the person out of the most active most likely to flip scum )
I don't really follow what you are saying here. Aren't the more active players more likely to be town, because contributing as town as a direct positive correlation to our goal? And aren't the players that are lurking, and not contributing much more likely to be scum, because they don't want to help the town figure out the puzzle? (sorry for my previous post, but I tried to post this 3 times and it wasn't going through!)
In post 308, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:but there's the fact
Creature wrote:Watch out with who's just inflating their post count.
In post 308, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:would
Raskolnikov wrote:hmmm
In post 323, Raskolnikov wrote:giga how do you interpret gayreen willingness to put think to l-1 without comment?
that and not that much info in general (though still more than think/rak) makes me not feel safe clearing him just yet
In post 320, schadd_ wrote:@GBT, rask: how many games have you played?
In post 100, GAYreenHamster wrote:In post 7, schadd_ wrote:ooh!
2. i like the people at dominion forum but part of the fun of mafia is making character judgments about people you don't know
3. thus far, i have been mafia twice and town once. at this point, i was happy to get town just because of that, but i also like town more because knowing everything is boring
4. i like target-investigative roles, the example here being tracker
UNVOTE: gigabyteTroubador, VOTE: ThinkBig
Granted, considering your point on the newbie claiming the PR they might have gotten, he could be Tracker if he decided to soft the role in that way
In post 328, Raskolnikov wrote:about how many games you and gayreen played on that other site?
In post 334, Raskolnikov wrote:wait weren't you on EM with like maria and transcend and stuff too
the avatar thing
In post 335, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:we just bonded really quickly over open 646 (where i actually mention disliking EM)
gigabyteTroubadour wrote:yeah em's community seems kinda toxic idk... not rly somewhere i want to associate w/ and play frequently. i like f2f mafia for a fast paced game
i like here a lot. but good to know
In post 337, Raskolnikov wrote:I like the part where the wordcloud forms a table lamp
schadd_ wrote:imo the best way to get someone back into the game is to put them at L-1 and then vote them another time
In post 341, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:actually i kind of just made a really weird assumption so i'm going to resolve it
rask why aren't you townreading me? or at least strong enough to cross out like schadd_ or matt (creature i'd add in too but he's basically conftown tbh)
i assumed you just aren't really familiar with me and i'm not a newbie so i'm not as likely to tell as transparently but i'm worse at this then i let on sometimes
In post 361, GAYreenHamster wrote:how is creature practically conftown
In post 16, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:(early game I don't like to give reasoning for most of my actuons because it helps develop my reads)
In post 392, cassielle wrote:2: post 89????? "i should know, i caught my first scum with RQS" ???????? wtf? ok then why would oyu shut it down if its a good noob-friendly way of catching scum? WORST CASE SCENARIO: you that concerned with q no. 4? then say "EXCEPT DONT ANSWER THIS K". this is silly and ridiculous and omg im gonna aneurysm over here.
In post 392, cassielle wrote:also noticing a lot of strong townreads from gbT but v weak scumreads, which is a tactic i employ as scum. you have perfect knowledge and you want to hide that, but you also have to look like youre contributing. this guy gets 4 perfect townreads by p4, but doesnt have any good scumreads? yeah no not buying that garbage.
In post 392, cassielle wrote:speaking of which why tf is gbT townleader here at all? BECAUSE TALKATIVE SCUM????? hes not contibuting anything but townreads and post 108 "closest thing i have to a scumread" (tb)??? pls you got it down to 3 possibles and youre still gonna say you only suspect one even with the lurkin? at the very least here youd recognize that one of the two lurks is more likely to be town than not and that youre vibing with someone you shouldnt be (oh wait youre scum nvm lol)
In post 392, cassielle wrote:1: noobtown seems to lean toward the paranoid side. theyd see q4 and dive deep into the ocean of WIFOM madness and decide its best to just pick a role that isnt theirs, or they wouldnt care and the mafia learns absolutely nothing even despite that. certainly no ones gonna ask about vt, how the hell can this be rolefishin since everybody gonna pick a p common role most likely but no ones gonna say vt? scumscuse for anti-town behavior imo
In post 332, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:In post 330, Transcend wrote:which one was bad?
the first one
usually when that's asked it has PR fishing intentions. i don't really see any other purpose of asking it besides fluff (which is generally not something i scumread but it's not good imo) or pr fishing.Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 328, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:wait fuck i forgot about that lmfao
gamma why were you trying to start a page 7 rqs?? like 2 and 3 are actually OK questions for an RQS (1 is a terrible rqs question and you should know that ://) but like what are you expecting to achieve with that?
I like to wait so everyone can get to know each other because I try to ask a trust-based question (question 3, about who you think is good as town)
no but like
what sort of motive did you have with those questions? what were you expecting?
and usually any time beyond page 1 is too late for an rqs... if you just want to ask the question ask it as a question
In post 400, cassielle wrote:gbT; why didn't you find a way to use those questions to get info, or at least continue with a diff RQS set?
you admit its a good idea shortly after killing it dead, but do nothing to replace it? no, sorry, i dont buy it. you could have kept it going in the background while developing good reads, but you jumped on TB and stopped that train cold. i want a good answer. im halfway leaning toward starting a new q&a session here and seeing how you react lol
In post 402, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:RVS is better now that my reads are better (i mean here they're shit apparently).
mattblackguy wrote: I don't like fluff too much, and try to avoid it when possible, which is why my post count is so much lower than many others.
In post 406, cassielle wrote:regarding info to get from those questions:
first off, it sets up a baseline and makes sure you know everyones experience level. id have followed it up with an experienced-folks-only question set involving who theyve played with before and what pointers they can give about town/scum metas, but thats just because i would want to level that playing field information-wise -- ses and ic have an advantage in knowing some of their counterparts, noobs are just about completely unaware of everyone.
secondly (less important from a game perspective, more important from a learning perspective) it gives everyone an opening to ask about roles they dont understand to the ic without unintentionally (even unknowingly) softing themselves as that role -- because EVERYONE is doing it and MOST are going to be vt or scum! that gives noobs a leg up that the experienced folks already have, without shifting balance. important later, though not immediately.
third, you can always jump on random peoples questions and request followups. avoid q4 and you avoid looking like youre rolefishing. and by doing this you can grab onto anyones questions list as a thread to tug at if you want more info but dont want to be tugging on the latest discussion threads for whatever reason (cornering a suspicious player into a position, etc). it gives town a powerful tool by forcing everyone to put a bit of themselves up front at the start in a way that rvs doesnt quite do. furthermore, while you cant ask a latecomer to engage in rvs for tells, you can ask them to fill out the standard q&a sheet everyone else has got to drag info out of them. its easy to dodge a "oh whats your reads list" at this stage just coming in, too lazy to do a deep re-read or w/e you want really. it corners the lurkers into making a move that people can latch onto later if necessary, which (as you saw with my predecessor lol) isnt as easy without it.
ill seriously consider rqs 2.0 still, but im gonna wait for your reaction to this post.
p-edit: im ok with shade, but id WAY prefer schadd_, gbT or rask. moreso schadd_ or rask atm, im getting info out of gbT!
and yeah @gbT you totally strike me that way, imo were actually quite a lot alike haha
In post 418, cassielle wrote:im on board with most of these, but imo post 53 schadd_ is pure evil, its a quiet way of asking "is it a good play to off the IC for mafia?" like, the best you could say is NAI, to me it comes off as ultrascum
In post 517, ThinkBig wrote:{S}Schadd
{S}Cassielle
Raskolnikov wrote:Fuck you too. "Top townread" and you don't defend me at all, don't see you anywhere and you appear the moment I claim.
In post 623, cassielle wrote:so itd be tb + mbg, i do not foresee a shade + mbg pairing
cassielle wrote:and my scumfeels on tb are weaker than they are on shade to a small extent ftr, so i really dont vibe with a tb+mbg team even tho its the best non-rask option
In post 83, mattblackguy wrote:VOTE: Rakkar
Just because I wanted to vote someone and also because Rakkar is scum.
cassielle wrote:wrt my scumread on mbg: scrutinize his readlists fromstart to finish and check vote patterns too. sheepy from start to finish, rapidchange in reads between first 2 lists, but backs off a wagon with a strong general scumread (that he agrees on) on it at l-1. could be noob cold feet, but still leans scum imo
In post 634, cassielle wrote:-grey-? waaaay too towny. aggressive af and not in the least bit afraid to go out on a limb to find them scums
In post 634, cassielle wrote:im stuck on rask. someone give to me guidance here, i have never been so sure of scum and yet had someone claim like that
In post 641, cassielle wrote:as mbg said, 8 days of discussion left, lets make use of it! and i really, really want to hear him talk about that shallow af polished af read list
In post 653, Creature wrote:Okay, my townread on GAYreen was a mistake.
In post 650, Creature wrote:Oh nice, another claim that came out without me wanting one.
VOTE: -Grey-
Creature wrote:VOTE: RadiantCowbells
Raskolnikov wrote:That's a weird way of saying it
[img]http://i.imgur.com/nBDesE7.jpg[/img]
In post 962, RadiantCowbells wrote:My issue rn is that I don't see why scum Gigabyte busses in this situation rather than search out the PR if they targeted Raskol like they should have.
In post 967, RadiantCowbells wrote:I thought ThinkBig was reasonably likely to be scum and I didn't want to risk you switching over.
RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: GBT
That's one.
In post 976, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think it's really out of character for Grey to push Cass as hard as they did yesterday and to accept a compromise wagon.
In post 944, Creature wrote:UNVOTE:
I don't counterclaim Rask, but I would lake to make sure everyone confirms that.
mattblackguy wrote:In post 986, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:matt are you a notetaker?
Not sure what you mean exactly.
In post 992, cassielle wrote:if you really think that the way i shook up the gamestate was totally unnecessary, id like to see it in a post, clearly spelled out
Raskolnikov wrote:I'd want to think that if cass was paired with anyone but a newbie she'd know enough about how counterclaims work to feel very ridiculous in her push. But I suppose that isn't an entirely safe assumption either.
In post 1014, Raskolnikov wrote:Gigabyte top picks for scum?
In post 1024, cassielle wrote:why did i do it the way that i did? well, why was the townblock so crystallized?
Creature wrote:Why's schadd_ is town again?
schadd_ wrote:In post 1054, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:pedit: schadd_ is townposting
are you calling our town shit?
Raskolnikov wrote:Oh whoops, too soon.
In post 1107, Raskolnikov wrote:Is that because you're scum creature?
Creature wrote:I don't see RC and Cass partnered together, even if RC has the fame of superbussing. Though, I feel Cass is the town and RC is the scum.
RadiantCowbells wrote:
there's a difference between saying "guys trust my read" and "tell me where i'm wrong" though
there's no point in telling someone to trust my read because that doesn't progress the gamestate at all
asking you to explain why your read is different actually does and is what i'm actually looking for
The answer to where you're wrong, assuming town, is that Creature knows exactly what you're looking for to townread him and did exactly that.
In post 1118, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:speaking of grey
i'm kind of curious how he's actually reading me
In post 1138, -Grey- wrote:Iirc, you seemed to be the one actually driving the game forward.
When you reconsider your reads, you do so through an objective lens
In post 1142, -Grey- wrote:No, and I don't see where you got that was what my post indicated in the slightest.
In post 1152, Raskolnikov wrote:giga talk more about that rc/cass thingo you apparently think is scum