In post 239, mattblackguy wrote:mattblackguy - Town
GAYreenHamster - Town
Shade - Town
rakkar - Mafia
schadd_- Town
Raskolnikov (SE) - Town
ThinkBig (SE) - Mafia
gigabyteTroubadour (SE) - Town
Creature (IC) - Town
So did we win?
In post 240, mattblackguy wrote:By the way, my previous post was 100% serious. I really do believe Rakkar, and ThinkBig are the mafia. Rakkar hasn't contributed anything to the game. He hasn't posted any opinions on anything that has gone on in this game so far, and hasn't posted any of his thoughts about the other players (who he thinks is town, who he thinks is scum etc.) I will not remove my vote from Rakkar unless he actually contributes something.
In post 299, Raskolnikov wrote:1. mattblackguy2. GAYreenHamster
3. Shade
4. rakkar
5. schadd_
6. Raskolnikov (SE)
7. ThinkBig (SE)
8. gigabyteTroubadour (SE)9. Creature (IC)
In post 536, mattblackguy wrote:In post 534, -Grey- wrote:Why are your reads the popular consensus?
Not the popular consensus anymore. Ever since Cass has come in the town seems a little more split. Before we were basically circle jerking, reading each other as town, and reading the lurkers as scum. I'm glad we moved away from that, and think we're in a better state now.
In post 537, mattblackguy wrote:In post 535, -Grey- wrote:That's nice and all, but what has everyone else besides TB done to convince you they're town?
It was more so since I thought rakkar, and thinkbig was scum that everyone else had to be town (because of the rolelist). My thinking was pretty naive and noobess now looking back at it in hindsight. Honestly this is my first game, and I'm still trying to figure things out.
In post 367, mattblackguy wrote:Since Rakkar is most likely getting replaced later today I'll just drop my vote on him now, and see what the new person says.
In post 369, mattblackguy wrote:Lastly it does seem to me that Gayreen is just following whatever you(Giga) say in an attempt to gain a town read from you.
In post 400, cassielle wrote:wrapping it up relatively quicklike. i got strong scumdar pings on gbT, schadd_ and rask.
In post 431, Creature wrote:This looks really reckless for scum, but what bothers me is that he took 13 mins to make post 240.
What's your opinion?
In post 455, cassielle wrote:actually, excluding gbT id like a condensed prelim reads list from you creature, just for compare and contrast purposes. ill do the same:
TOWNIEST
creature
gayreen
tb
mbg
shade
schadd_
rask
SCUMMIEST
and if you could your preferred scumteam pairings.
In post 472, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: Shade
Probably should've joined this wagon when it originally happened.
In post 286, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: rakkar
this is most likely the scum.
Holding onto the tell for now but it's a good one, tried and true.
In post 468, Raskolnikov wrote:Gayreen
Shade
Thinkbig
{Thinkbig, Gayreen}
{Shade, Gayreen}
Thinkbig/shade prob not
Not quite convincing, potentially wrong on someone
In post 575, Raskolnikov wrote:re: 570Not quite convincing, potentially wrong on someoneNot quite convincing, potentially wrong on someone
That was the emphasis in that post. The point, the conclusion, of it. If on the other hand it all looked sunshine and daisies I might've just followed it on blind faith but is that what it looked like?
Though other townreads disagreeing with me there too was a part of it as well, perhaps you missed the context via just ISOing?
In post 580, mattblackguy wrote:UNVOTE: Rask
I don't want the day to end just yet. There's still plenty to talk about.
In post 584, cassielle wrote:rask is THE SEVENTH CIRCLE now. mbg is scumlean, tb and shade are my prefered scumbuddies for rask. scum busses and tb flaked quick when the pressure ratcheted, and shades been distant but rask has been mostly ignoring shade until people started staring his way.
In post 608, Raskolnikov wrote:Are you 100% saying you're not going to reconsider trying to lynch me today?
In post 625, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Grey, can you go a bit more into your scumread on him?
In post 635, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:i mean
if grey is who i think he is (if he is an alt i'm keeping him under wraps sorry)
i think it's totally within his scumrange to do that
In post 639, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:that's what they all say ♡♡
In post 643, cassielle wrote:theres also the fact that he clammed up when he saw a (fake) l-1 before. i want him to talk, not curl up and die
In post 678, cassielle wrote:534: FIRST post worth commenting on??? commenting on MBG's list at 239, not saying a word about those weird ass claims and such prior? arguably this is NAI leaning town but im suspicious af about there being nothing to comment on from 135 to 160-ish just for example. #535 still leaning on MBG but it is valid and in order here.
In post 678, cassielle wrote:#547 is vaguely scummy imo -- expresses disgust with mbg pulling vote off player to be replaced who had prior contributed literally almost nothing. its giving the newcomer a fair chance to make their name lol, that is the correct motorcycle when lurkers replace out (obv diff players are a diff story)
In post 14, mastina wrote:Clean slates are the worst possible thing to do.
There's a reason that if a player is being run up and then needs to be replaced, most of the time, the town lynches the slot.
They're not gonna bother with the shit a replacement will give, since the replacement won't do anything to change people's minds.
In post 678, cassielle wrote:#571 dismisses a valid line of reasoning. in fact, a line of reasoning used by mbg and accepted by grey at that point as well! see #541In post 576, -Grey- wrote:
I don't give them a clean slate, if that's what you're asking.
That said, I read Cass as town anyway.
I was agreeing with your post, if you couldn't tell.
In post 678, cassielle wrote:#578 is CONVINCING REASONING. the speed at which it came out of fuckin nowhere was not. i recall feeling this way when i first saw it, but i was (and to a slightly reduced degree, am!) so convinced of rask flipping red that i just sat on it (see my feelings on mbg as poss. scumteam member in #604)
In post 699, cassielle wrote:#582 casts shade but doesnt claim towntell or scumtell, just "tell". mbg's noob, implies NOOBtell to me. #582 feels light anti-town to me -- either greys ignored everything up to this point while reading through or hes scumteam, otherwise hed realize hes probably seeing mbg's repeatedly stated inexperience with mafia lol
In post 699, cassielle wrote:#586 is further contentless shade casting on mbg. while i agree its indicative of something, i did not and do not agree its enough to even FoS mbg rn, we need to focus on our bigger scumbags. its also an ULTRA-easy read, which is why i was dismissing peoples concerns with gayreen changing mind on the tb l-1 -- thats a copout read, it stands out, grabs attention and means nothing. scum can use it to pretend they have real opinions
In post 699, cassielle wrote:#609 feels like its pushing for an immediate lynch. its trying to corner rask into a "well thats scum claim" position. i even gave rask an out from that in 610 because W T F. i dont mind that sort of play but we have A FULL WEEK OF DAYTIME, you corner someone that way on the last day of day phase rofl you dont do that shit midway through, wtf??? scum af here
In post 699, cassielle wrote:#637 why did it take this long for this? why? rask claimed a full HOUR prior. W T F. and why the hell put pressure on tb again? what is the point here? what more is going to come of this? i make this point several times around here, saying "no more than l-2" and gbT and -Grey- are BOTH dismissive of my point here, but gbT is trying to allay concerns while -Grey- (#644) is sayingthat everything points to TB=scum anyway so who gives a fuck. S C U M
In post 716, cassielle wrote:i dont really buy meta arguments USUALLY (outside of very hard, near infallible town/scumread meta like creature), so im going to say no, that doesnt matter here, it still feels like a scum mindset to me.
In post 738, schadd_ wrote:but getting a bit too frustrated with cass's arguments (she's done that with, like, everybody, bub)
In post 739, cassielle wrote:2: the second time you brought it up -- if its true, i would be willing to say that your meta and mine work so poorly with each other than one of us would naturally be a d1 lynch in any game we were in. to me, shutting down info is ALWAYS anti-town. shortening the day dramatically is ALWAYS anti-town. i would read that meta and say "so its a player that personally id want to policy lynch because nothing about where theyre coming from feels pro-town to me at all no matter what side theyre on"
In post 739, cassielle wrote:3: you never even linked to a representative game like gbT did on a couple occasions in this very game, which makes me think youd be hoping id dig into a couple games shallowly, get exhausted from info overload and accept it at face value. notthat that would help this, see 1 and 2.
In post 739, cassielle wrote:4: finally, those posts i want you to read arent meta. they are directly relevant to this discussion, in this game, in this very conversation in fact. that is a pretty considerable difference.
In post 610, -Grey- wrote:ISOed Ircher, he seems pretty town.
In post 753, cassielle wrote:when someone tried to pressure you, you waved it off super-casually.
In post 1052, -Grey- wrote:In post 679, krylea wrote:Grey seems v scummy to me too - lots of bickering, controlling the tone of the town but not actually giving very much information or analysis. Very combative, but not in a way that actually leads to information for town. This might just be a playstyle thing though? I'd have to read his meta and I don't want to do that right now.
Look at this scumread.
LOOK AT IT!
Bickering - NAI
Controlling the tone of the town - vague accusation that doesn't actually say anything
Not giving much information or analysis - anti-town, not scummy
Combative - NAI
She admits her read on me may be playstyle but has zero intention to do the legwork to see whether I play this way and whether it's alignment indicative, but she's thrilled to string me up for it regardless.In post 679, krylea wrote:I like HS, I like AA and I like Alisae. The latter two mostly because of the Asphodel wagon.
Why? What about that one wagon makes them town? How could they not do it as scum?
Fucking weak.In post 679, krylea wrote:I can't fucking stand TF, but I don't think it's alignment indicative. I think he's just an asshole.
Blah blah blah. For bitching about someone not leading to information for town, you're saying a whole lot of nothing about 2F, hypocrite.In post 751, krylea wrote:In post 748, -Grey- wrote:Since Gamma claimed Ascetic Enabler, any "no results" results should be insta-lynched because the ascetic(s) is/are scum hiding behind the role.
I'm happy returning to my previous vote.
VOTE: Naomi
I don't like this. There are tons of other roles that could lead to no-results. This could just give scum easy mislynches. This + your "scumslip" thing earlier really make it seem like you are out for excuses to push lynches.
At this point I think I am convinced enough to drop the Asphodel thing for the moment - though I'd like to revisit it later.
VOTE: Grey
Bullshit vote. She sees me as an easy target and abandons her Asphodel push while keeping her options open should she have to walk back her read on me later.In post 848, krylea wrote:In post 817, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't believe the claim for a second. Even then, optimal play IMO is to lynch me, and let the town PRs do their work tonight.
Orrrrrr, instead of lynching town, we could lynch scum instead, how bout that?
I am not happy with the situation vis a vis grey and am not sure I buy the claim, but I'll UNVOTE: for now.
Probably going to go back to Asphodel wagon, but it's getting a bit too much traction too fast this time and I want to look at who is hopping back on it.
Why should town care about the speed of votes on a renewed wagon that was temporarily stalled in favor of another one? It doesn't make the wagon any worse simply because players are returning to it.
She was paranoid about how hopping over would look and wanted to appear townie.
On top of that, her ISO is just filled with shade casting and coasting.
VOTE: krylea
In post 761, cassielle wrote:didnt get that far before i checked back in, my bad.
In post 766, cassielle wrote:and the personal attacks
In post 772, cassielle wrote:i did not intentionally misrepresent you. if i misrepresented you at all i dont want you to jump on me with both feet and just start beating tf out of me, i want you to point out specifics calmly.
In post 780, mattblackguy wrote:UNVOTE: Rask
In post 679, mattblackguy wrote:Before Rask claimed tracker in this game he asked if there was anything to change Cass' mind or if she was just going to lynch him anyway. Cass responded saying she doesn't think Rask is capable on convincing her that he's not scum. And then immediately afterwards Rask claims tracker.
In post 784, mattblackguy wrote:I didn't believe the game but after everyone has been active after the claim and no one CCed there was no reason to keep my vote there
In post 787, mattblackguy wrote:Rask was at L-2 at the time, and the pressure was shifting more to ThinkBig at L-1 so I think it was awkward for him to claim at that time when he wasn't about to get lynched at that moment.
In post 560, Aeronaut wrote:
In post 566, Raskolnikov wrote:Can we please wagon this instead of me, thank you all for your cooperation.
VOTE: Thinkbig
Will sheep for hire
In post 580, mattblackguy wrote:UNVOTE: Rask
In post 618, cassielle wrote:the rage feels town but theres this real "GTFO MY BACK" feeling that idk, you STILL come across scum to me
In post 720, -Grey- wrote:In post 678, cassielle wrote:#571 dismisses a valid line of reasoning. in fact, a line of reasoning used by mbg and accepted by grey at that point as well! see #541In post 576, -Grey- wrote:
I don't give them a clean slate, if that's what you're asking.
That said, I read Cass as town anyway.
I was agreeing with your post, if you couldn't tell.
Who's the one skimming now, Casserole? But it's town if you do it right?
More bullshit misrep.
In post 796, cassielle wrote:i dont consider this misrepresentative. this is clearly put out as subjective, from where im sitting. can we agree that i at least represented it as my personal read there?
In post 771, -Grey- wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=69704
This game lasted three weeks.
Town lynched four scum in five day phases.
GTFO with that "wanting to cut days short is anti-town" bullshit.
In post 800, cassielle wrote:and if its slinging shit to say that it looked to me (AGAIN with the above in mind, that i was looking at it from a scumread point of view to start) like you had found a weak player who was an easy lynch, then scumhunting around you is impossible and i /will/ replace out.
In post 807, cassielle wrote:again with the caveat of me not saying youre actually etc etc.
In post 810, cassielle wrote:p-edit: fair. i can work with that and the same goes for me.
In post 817, cassielle wrote:p-edit 2: shade's one of the lurk slots like TB. his ISO is short, sweet, and just about unreadable
In post 819, cassielle wrote:which i just now realized is a valid reason behind your approach to me *connects face to desk*
In post 823, cassielle wrote:p-edit: re: the approach thing, you could very well have been trying to irritate and frustrate me purposefully to get my guard down, unfiltered reactions, etc. i dont think its the case but its POSSIBLE and imo i should have thought of that
In post 826, mattblackguy wrote:In post 824, -Grey- wrote:It's typically my approach outside of the newbie queue, so it's sort of turned into habit I guess.
How you played mafia elsewhere, and if yes then where/how much? You have less than 2 months on this site, but seems like you have more experience than that.
In post 832, cassielle wrote:i hate not having a vote out
In post 835, cassielle wrote:that exactly precisely thank you.
In post 837, mattblackguy wrote:I think it makes sense if schadd flipped scum that I could be his scum buddy
In post 841, cassielle wrote:idk @-grey- would this be a policy lynch normally? i have no idea, im weirded out
In post 852, cassielle wrote:ive read it before but that was awhile back. i see i havent been doing it right to be sure ha
In post 857, mattblackguy wrote:Not sure 100% what you mean. Do you mean why do I care if others think I'm scum or something else? I care, because I want to understand their reasoning, and I can put myself in their shoes it'll help me understand their train of thought.
In post 778, Raskolnikov wrote:but I think she has to be confbiasing/tunnely town through sheer amount of being that heavily invested in what she does
In post 871, Raskolnikov wrote:Well the efforts part of it too, I guess, if it was less you could maybe handwave it. But if there's that much and it all points to her being invested into the game and actually believing the (often faulty) things she says, I'd assume most people incapable of that acting.
In post 878, schadd_ wrote:grey is definitely angry, which i think you get good at feigning if you play F2F, but who knows. pointing things out before reading all the way is kinda towny, but i would think he knows that. there's a lot of rhetorical/unanswerable questions which gives me a yucky impression (see 534, 609, 801, 838). it's kinda hard for me to divorce scum from mean and abrasive, so this is more difficult.
In post 887, cassielle wrote:i dont have any idea what that post is about. at all.
In post 893, cassielle wrote:if you want to say that is misrepresentative, tell me how i could have drawn /any/ conclusions about that post /at all/ -- and i do mean /any/ conclusions, short of "you know how to type" or "you are proficient in the english language" -- and i will accept that i misrepresented you outright without further explanation from your side.
In post 894, schadd_ wrote:In post 879, -Grey- wrote:In post 878, schadd_ wrote:grey is definitely angry, which i think you get good at feigning if you play F2F, but who knows. pointing things out before reading all the way is kinda towny, but i would think he knows that. there's a lot of rhetorical/unanswerable questions which gives me a yucky impression (see 534, 609, 801, 838). it's kinda hard for me to divorce scum from mean and abrasive, so this is more difficult.
Those questions are neither rhetorical nor unanswerable. They are pointed. They put the recipient on the spot for a reason.
mm. the one that stuck out to me was, perhaps intuitively, the one that you asked me. 801, "schadd_, why does your ISO read like coasting scum?" and obviously, i mean, i don't really see it, because i'm town. me being able to answer this pulls counter to the sentiment of 842 (though this may have been a rhetorical question, heh). so, it feels like you're just fishing for me to not be able to answer your question.
In post 898, cassielle wrote:interesting that schadd_ handles your post
In post 974, cassielle wrote:p-edit: radiant is reading stronger and stronger scum before i even review the topic, just from 957 onward. not so much 957 itself (i dont scumread people for scumreading me, its poor play imo) but in conjunction with what happens after it and the completely incomprehensible creature scumread.
In post 1008, Raskolnikov wrote:Why don't you remind me why you changed your mind.
In post 1024, cassielle wrote:p-edit: GAYreen was a weird case. my read is "probably town" but i examined that ISO front and back and theres weirdness that feels noob, but GAYreen wasnt a noob iirc
In post 1099, cassielle wrote:grey has contributed little to nothing of substance to the discussion at all aside from responding to some interrogation from rask.
In post 1115, RadiantCowbells wrote:@Raskolnikov Grey is an alt with someone who I have experience with and I don't want to go into any more detail on the subject.
In post 1121, Raskolnikov wrote:well you know what they say everybody lies right
In post 1135, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:You were townreading me D1 too, right? Do you remember exactly why?
In post 1141, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:if i'm just saying "whelp everyone's town TB/rakkar" is it actually driving the game forward?
In post 1141, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:and more on the second part pls
In post 1151, cassielle wrote:certain degree of separation there (lack of serious questioning, not much attempt to understand motivations), helpful tone, nulltown-ish reads, etc
In post 1154, -Grey- wrote:In post 1151, cassielle wrote:certain degree of separation there (lack of serious questioning, not much attempt to understand motivations), helpful tone, nulltown-ish reads, etc
This is bullshit.
I spent a good portion of the day suspecting him, and never had him anywhere in the same vicinity of any read that had town anywhere in it.
Straight "null" was the highest he ever got in my reads, and he was a scumread for quite a while.
In post 1178, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:hi grey
In post 1180, gigabyteTroubadour wrote::dead:
@schadd_ this is what i meant by me being fun/easy to fuck with earlier in the game i think
In post 1191, Creature wrote:tbh schadd_ flipping town would also help.
In post 1217, Raskolnikov wrote:how does a creature-gray team look?
thats what I was wondering when I asked about greys partners
In post 1220, RadiantCowbells wrote:Gigabyte/Grey actually makes sense too.
In post 1229, RadiantCowbells wrote:Why is the guy with an ego through the fucking roof self describing their play as craptastic?
In post 1232, RadiantCowbells wrote:Okay then mr. shitty town I really don't care what you have to say and I don't particularly think that you're town so you can either shut the fuck up and vote somewhere else or I am going to lynch you today and if town loses because of it then it's no one's problem but yours.
In post 1231, Raskolnikov wrote:grey can i get a reads list
In post 1236, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Grey fuck off you obtuse twit
In post 1239, Raskolnikov wrote:so what's the difference between your reads and his?
In post 1247, RadiantCowbells wrote:Towny: Rask
Townlean: Schadd, MattBlack
Nullscum: Grey, GigaByteTroubadour
Scummy: Cassielle, Creature
In post 1310, mattblackguy wrote:
Oh shit I can't believe I didn't notice this.
VOTE: Grey
In post 1331, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:In post 1306, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:bwuh
?????????????????????
didn't he just say he was townreading me or at least heavily insinuate it??
grey your brand of assholery needs explanation please and ty
ok but this in relation to 1237 still needs some sort of explanation
In post 1333, cassielle wrote:
just pointing out that gbT isnt in that post anywhere
still not seeing the issue gbT has there tho
In post 1335, cassielle wrote:rask is conftown, grey and rc are strong town, gbT is schroedinger alignment, schadd_ mbg creature have the whiff of brimstone and vile secrets to them
In post 1346, Raskolnikov wrote:What happened
In post 1390, mattblackguy wrote:If RC has a history of bussing then him hammering Schadd wouldn't let him coast to end game. It would be 1v8 uphill battle.
In post 1461, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't recall a town slot in the last year ever being pretty sure that I was town.
In post 1629, RadiantCowbells wrote:I would lynch Creature today as well.
In post 1667, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:which part of that quote
that i knew it was an rc alt or that rc thinks he can't claim doctor (he can't)
In post 1672, schadd_ wrote:no, like, the thing where a wrong account posted here. i mean we don't do alts at dominion forum but that's the sorta thing that gets modkilled
In post 1692, schadd_ wrote:
lynch mbg -> lynch creature is already seeming like the course of action; scum creature wants to raise questions (like yours from just now for example) so that such doesn't happen
In post 1710, cassielle wrote:@ rask creature and -grey-, top two scum reads other than matt before we end day
In post 1728, Raskolnikov wrote:I can't hammer him though he's only at l-2 now
In post 1735, Raskolnikov wrote:(expired on 2017-01-22 00:18:35)
In post 1740, mattblackguy wrote:Not if you copy the text and click the quote button. That's how I always quote.
In post 1743, Raskolnikov wrote:I thought grey was going to push the angle that editing the countdown was purposely done with scum incentive to confuse us
In post 1759, RadiantCowbells wrote:Still pretty certain the dude's scum.
In post 1779, schadd_ wrote:anyway, back to square 1. grey, why does your iso read like coasting scum?
In post 1794, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:grey can u talk to me about your thought process in townreading cassie, scumreading, and then townreading again D1?
In post 1794, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:he's teasing you
In post 1795, schadd_ wrote:incidentally, i want to call someone a cunt before the game's over but it should surely wait for a good time (wikipedia describes it as one of the few words left in english with shock value)
In post 1827, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:-Grey- wrote:If Cass was scum, I'm pretty sure I'd have been a priority nk simply because of our d1 interactions.
but you layed off of her
i'm going to see how genuine i think the interaction is once i can reread
In post 1835, schadd_ wrote:-Grey- wrote:In post 1827, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:-Grey- wrote:If Cass was scum, I'm pretty sure I'd have been a priority nk simply because of our d1 interactions.
but you layed off of her
i'm going to see how genuine i think the interaction is once i can reread
If you were scum and I came after you the way I went after Cass d1, would you leave me alive and simply hope I didn't get another hair up my ass?
idk. they did that with me no problem. and rc. i mean, it would not hard to realize cass is a dangerously easy lynch this game. in fact, she would be such an easy mislynch if it weren't for tb and mbg