In post 110, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:GAYreen (and any of the newer players here), have you read any games on here? It might be a good idea to see what's considered scummy/townie (if you don't already have a sense) or just get an idea of how a game usually goes.
voting me is scummy (+some tone je ne sais quoi that i don't like)
In post 180, schadd_ wrote:
gayreen: agh, null. his only voting item was on me; newbie!clumsy!scumhunting is townie, voting me is scummy (+some tone je ne sais quoi that i don't like)
In post 190, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:oh matt i forgot to mention
i definitely think a pr would claim pr, getting lynched as provable town is way worse than nk'd
plus if he's scum and claims pr he can bait the real pr to claim (or get away with a fake-claim). you're kind of close with your logic here actually, a PR only shouldn't CC D1. Always claim your real role at L-1 (and are town) unless you absolutely know what you're doing
In post 143, ThinkBig wrote:Since I am at L-2 or 1, I'm going to claim. I am a Vanilla Townie
When I get home from work, I'll catch up on everything.
In post 150, ThinkBig wrote:
I disagree. I think there are times in which one should claim when they are at L2/1 even before someone declares intent. I'll expand on that later.
In post 269, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:but the question for the audience here is why shade over TB
In post 213, Shade wrote:How can we bring down someone's guard to understand their motivations?
In post 213, Shade wrote:If there are several behaviors that are already known as scummy, why would any scum do them? Unless if you're saying a newbie might do them when they're scum which contradicts with your action - pointing them out to them.
In post 290, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:post or perish (i say voting for the person out of the most active most likely to flip scum )
In post 230, rakkar wrote:I'm keen to play but it feels pretty overwhelming to to see ten pages to read in less than 48 hours.
In post 368, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:@Matt, if Rakkar's replacement reads as obvious town, who do you think would be the best lynch? Shade is the only person i can marginally think flips scum if not TB/Rakkar but then TB/Shade doesn't make much sense to me.
In post 369, mattblackguy wrote:Lastly it does seem to me that Gayreen is just following whatever you(Giga) say in an attempt to gain a town read from you.
In post 376, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:sleeping for real now :dea:
In post 432, cassielle wrote:mbg's read lists are ugly. let me look for his second readlist, its a MESS. it also DOES NOT follow from his first list in the least.
In post 473, cassielle wrote:mbg's hard to read-ish but he's lurky and his reads are at least passably anti-town
In post 400, cassielle wrote:my mbg read has dropped to nullscum on a doublecheck and rethink of reasoning. the anarchist vibes are likely a personality trait shinign through in general (see avatar), and his reads list is heavily floated toward the middle with few actually dead center purenull -- and those who are at the middle are the strongest of townreads imo. hes prob not on the scum team but hes not exactly playing pro-town. also not getting purenoob vibes, so theres something to be said for that.
In post 534, -Grey- wrote:Why are your reads the popular consensus?
In post 535, -Grey- wrote:That's nice and all, but what has everyone else besides TB done to convince you they're town?
In post 540, cassielle wrote:i follow the reasoning on gayreen even if i dont agree with it -- there a paranoia that stems from the inactivity, and i admit that is something i might have considered more, but to be fair, you have even fewer posts over all, what makes you more town here?
In post 367, mattblackguy wrote:Yeaaah. I'm reconsidering what I previously thought about Rakkar. Going back it seems like Rakkar is just a kid, and this game didn't turn out like he thought it would so he just disappeared.
In post 548, -Grey- wrote:Hypocrite, thy name is matt.
In post 540, cassielle wrote:shade feels more scummy than gayreen or even tb imo. can i get the reasoning for him being above them? i guess another way to word this is -- what do you weight more when looking for scumreads? activity, content, tone, or gut? theres good reasons to reconsider shades placement based on some of those.
In post 557, cassielle wrote:imo tb and gayreen pinging your scumdar for inactivity isnt very consistent here, even considering timing, shades also dropped off after an initial okay-ish showing
In post 557, cassielle wrote:main thing with shade is, his posts arent just sparse, theyre also real fake and forced (creature noticed too) and low on content. a lot of pushback at being questioned but its gt a joking tone without the outrage i expect from town.
In post 586, -Grey- wrote:Did you see how fast mbg unvoted when I put Rask to L-1?
In post 593, cassielle wrote:@matt quickhammer would be a scum indicator from where im standing and id make it a policy lynch to wreck them on d2 for it.
In post 579, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:@Matt, when did Rask become your top scumread??
In post 526, mattblackguy wrote:Also hasn't taken many stances on issues yet most people are townreading him hard.(at least Giga, Creature, and Cass are) I still don't understand it.
Although the thing about roleblocker and claiming isn't going to apply here since we're goon/goon.
I think in this case if you're l-1 late in the day and you think you'll get lynched anyways you should claim tracker so I know who to target
but if you think you can survive and that people can swing to another lynch claiming VT gives you a chance at people reconsidering
In post 608, Raskolnikov wrote:In post 606, cassielle wrote:im feeling the same way about the defense dismissal. i also agree with mbg that 8 days is good time to keep up the scumhunting. rask is just like, digging this giant hole atm, not accepting pro-town advice early and its hurting him now on top of everything else. i think that wagon isnt at risk of losing momentum when the time comes and we can focus on finding scumbuddies. ill let you guys direct that tho because i dont mind giving rask more airtime to bury himself atm
Are you 100% saying you're not going to reconsider trying to lynch me today?
In post 610, cassielle wrote:1: claim could have been thinking he was at l-1 and not being around. ive read my share of noob games here and that is nooot uncommon -- someones not home, theyre at l-1 without intent, they claim and beg people not to hammer before they get home.
2: you never said a word about the underreaction, you let him lurk and moved to rakkar as your prime suspect lol
3: im saying that i dont think youre capable of convincing me you arent scum. if you want to try, you got all the rest of d1 to do so. i recommend working on an ironclad defense and making a masterpost on it instead of the fluffspam
In post 682, cassielle wrote:i want your opinion on -grey- atm
In post 767, cassielle wrote:actualyl no you know what, you want to hammer this slot, hammer this slot. jfc with your hypocritical bs.
VOTE: Cassielle
your move. ill be back tomorrow if the day aint done.
In post 824, -Grey- wrote:It's typically my approach outside of the newbie queue, so it's sort of turned into habit I guess.
In post 823, cassielle wrote:mbg+schadd_ is possible... feels forced but i dont know why i have that vibe.
In post 838, -Grey- wrote:How does this make sense from a town perspective??
In post 842, -Grey- wrote:If you're confirmed town to yourself, why would you think it's okay for others to consider you Scum?
In post 841, cassielle wrote:your post man, you jus about said "im scum and schadd_'s my scum buddy" there except im not sure if its possible for you to make that bad of a scumslip seriously
In post 855, cassielle wrote:In post 848, mattblackguy wrote:I was trying to look at the game from the perspective of others, and how others view me.
but back to this.
like i said, thats not a town way of thinking. why do you care about what others think here? youre town and you know it so i dont see why you wouldnt assume that town would find you, esp when theyre looking for scum. if you share their wincon you should fit right in.
In post 858, -Grey- wrote:If you are doing that, then town will recognize their own. It's not your job to appeal to town, that is scum's job.
In post 859, mattblackguy wrote:so I dont know what Im doing anymore.
In post 861, -Grey- wrote:Well, I suggest you find your groove because this kind of AtE won't keep you alive.
In post 911, RadiantCowbells wrote:TB, if you do not unvote Schadd in the next 24 hours I am going to hammer you.
Schadd is town and obviously so.
In post 989, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:Do you take notes while you play? like in a word doc or notepad or something
In post 992, cassielle wrote:rask is scum. im pretty sure this idea is about as popular as diving off a cliff atm so im not going to press this. i cannot get traction on that wagon and i know it
In post 1088, RadiantCowbells wrote:Again: there's no scumhunting in her ISO. Just her grandstanding about how everything everyone does is insanely scummy. At no point do I get the impression reading her posts that she is actually trying to solve the game, just feels like she wants to make people look scumm
In post 1024, cassielle wrote:ergo, we needed to look at those slots in detail. my methods were geared toward that. i cleared people quickly because i was trying to find the scum, not waste my time with probable townies.
In post 992, cassielle wrote:ok going over the topic:
schadd_ still reads scummy. not as scummy but still scummy. light scumlean? something like that. idk how people are missing what me and grey saw there, its fluff everywhere and almost no scumhunting. a lot of helping people who are scumhunting but no real work himself. very defensive when scumread or questioned.
matts also looking scummy. we keep giving him outs because hes new and hes not unaware enough to not take them, but i mean... way im seeing it: just because someone is new to mafia does not mean they are new to manipulating group dynamics, esp blame-game dynamics (which is the basis of mafia in essence). we should probably be tougher on his mistakes and not be so quick to offer a town-explanation, which is as much my fault as anyone's. theres also the quickness to frame tb's actions in the way he did when radiant jumped into the game
gbT is unreadable currently. lack of info? no, but lack of something. i want to say gbT is a townread but i feel like i may have dismissed my earlier questions too early and i dont see any real reason to believe that a townread is a good fit there.
radiant is pinging my scumdar for a lot of the reasons -grey- did, but without the convoluted thought process to get there; it just falls out of the posts. i can see a world where radiant is town, but it doesnt feel likely. however that slot had a good (if sparse) run as Shade, so im not comfortable making this a strong read
-grey- is null for reasons discussed prior. ill take a strong stand on him when it gets to lylo/mylo, if im alive that long.
creature is town.
rask is scum. im pretty sure this idea is about as popular as diving off a cliff atm so im not going to press this. i cannot get traction on that wagon and i know it
p-edit: regarding discrediting your townbloc, gbT: i was in fact trying to do that. ill even tell you why. but first: if you really think that the way i shook up the gamestate was totally unnecessary, id like to see it in a post, clearly spelled out
In post 1156, -Grey- wrote:And I know Cass already knows all this, because she spent d1 defending mbg from me.
In post 1176, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:i don't get cass/gigabyte tbh
In post 1282, -Grey- wrote:Okay, I'm feeling a Matt/RC scumteam here.
In post 1318, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:also matt why did you ask 1312?
In post 1315, schadd_ wrote:nop. my guy that i'm comparing him to will do that thing, addressing someone as scum, while being like "nah they're town."
In post 1323, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:why would i defend him if i pointed out the initial inconsistency though? dgi
In post 1353, RadiantCowbells wrote:Rask if I get lynched today will you lynch MBG then Creature?
In post 1362, Raskolnikov wrote:Maybe he can explain this turn.
In post 1395, Raskolnikov wrote:where did you hear this from though?
In post 1416, Creature wrote:I don't want to lynch matt.
In post 1427, cassielle wrote:i agree with schadd_
i dont buy mbg being town and i dont see either of -grey- or rc being scum
id like to see explanations for those reads.
In post 1431, Creature wrote:Okay it'll be hard.
In post 1441, cassielle wrote:IF mbg flips town (im pretty sure he wont) then rc and schadd_ are top of the list anyway with grey and gbT as runnersup based on his posts to date
In post 1449, Creature wrote:idk, if we mislynch today it's very unlikely Rask will track a kill (if he doesn't die before).
In post 1500, Raskolnikov wrote:If he was a real newbie it'd be a towntell but he has offsite experience so it isn't
In post 1518, Raskolnikov wrote:It's like how if you ask an a main account if they're an alt they'll 99% just say "no" but if you ask alts they'll half the time be like "does it matter?" and beat around the bush
In post 1528, Raskolnikov wrote:you should definitely take a day or two and give your last thoughts
In post 1575, cassielle wrote:wrong
because everyone else is scumreading you, its more useful to look at worlds where you are scum than not for us
you can say whatever you like, but talking bussing is valid until and unless we change our minds
In post 1578, cassielle wrote:so creature bussing meta anyone?
In post 1653, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:yes i meant tonight
In post 1671, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:this ^ makes me think that the whole thing is fake btw
In post 1688, -Grey- wrote:If they're scum partners, why would Creature tie himself to Matt right before Matt's flip?
In post 1703, schadd_ wrote:you can accomplish this by hammering, just a thought
In post 1711, Raskolnikov wrote:Definitely don't buy this "creature-mbg" scumteam though.
In post 2662, -Grey- wrote:Town had all those experienced players and let us newbscum win.
In post 2682, -Grey- wrote:Thanks for the carry, RC. You saved the day when I derped the NK... bit too be fair I stand by my logic that if you had been tracked to the kill that I wouldn't have survived LyLo.
In post 2692, -Grey- wrote:RC wanted to kill Creature but I told him I should because he has the skills to go deep.
If he had been tracked, we'd have lost for sure.
In post 2705, schadd_ wrote:i'm filled with desire both to quit mafia forever and play it until i die of retirement