In post 241, drealmerz7 wrote:In post 233, KainTepes wrote:because you are reluctant to reveal your answer,, and insistent on scumreading me for asking this question, and i dont think you have a good reason for trying to stop people from answering my question
I'm reluctant to assume revealing my answer does town any good
I'm not soley SRing because you ask the question, and you simplifying it as such as a way to dismiss the validity of my concerns is even more telling
my reasons are pro-town cautionary
and itseems like you're zoooming as fast as you can to get whatever you can before my CAUTIONARY influence is heeded at all (and you try to discredit my influence at the same time, of course)
people can always reveal in time to come, they can never take it back
do you see my concern?
also, it seems odd that you'd reveal you had such a role too, or that there'd even been one
So far two of my answers didn't come true. Different voting mechanics, and my role preference. I don't think your cautionary is pro town, and I certainly wouldn't call Kain tapes wanting to know anti town or scummy. There's a lot of fallacy in your posts.
Also, people can never take it back. Who would want to take it back? That seems like a scum mindset, not answering cause you can't take it back. Why would you want to?
Why would people lie on the questionnaire? Because they hate themselves?
I personally don't see your overwhelming concern at all. You're not satisfied to not answer, but also continue to argue against anyone else doing it. I don't get that.