In post 39, drealmerz7 wrote:I realized it is probably healthy for me to tell you all that I am vehemently opposed to sharing anything about how we answered the questionnaire. You all are going to do it as you do it, but I encourage NOT DOING IT, for the betterment of the game and for yourselves individually. Just don't talk about it. Further, just know that I will not be talking about it and will react poorly to those who try to get me to do otherwise.
In post 214, KainTepes wrote:what makes you assume i won't know anything???? this is a possibly bastard game after all..............
In post 217, KainTepes wrote:I'm not going to discuss with you any longer about this, dream. you don't have to answer if you don't want to. whoever who wants to answer my question, just answer it. it literally affects nothing so I don't see why not.
In post 223, KainTepes wrote:There's no benefit to me acting like this as scum,,
also i'm not going to continue this discussion, i want to see what other people say about it
In post 233, KainTepes wrote:because you are reluctant to reveal your answer,, and insistent on scumreading me for asking this question, and i dont think you have a good reason for trying to stop people from answering my question
In post 286, Davsto wrote:In post 285, drealmerz7 wrote:um, I disagree, he's not trying to understand, he's writing his own narratives
Said by the one who said that giving the answers we gave to a questionnaire is pointless because "what if we lied on our questionnaire"?
That's the point reached where you're objecting to something and scrambling for reasons to justify, rather than objecting to something because of those reasons.
In post 340, Davsto wrote:Maybe things would move along quicker if you stopped complaining about the game being stale and started doing things to help move it along other than complain about it being stale and whine about your wagon. Don't just say you're town, show it through your actions and by scumhunting somewhere which isn't conveniently the wagon on you.
In post 363, Desperado wrote:No it's not. "Participate or die" cannot be interpreted any other way than as a threat to vote him for lurking.
In post 386, Davsto wrote:Like gosh I should have seen what you said and rather than dare to think "ooh he's threatening to vote" and totally twist your words I should have known you were an anti-lurk gun dayvig
In post 477, Aristophanes wrote:Take a read there. It's a quick Iso to do. Tell me what you see.
In post 228, Narna wrote:I think Dreal is being thrown by KT's aggressiveness. I think it would be really smaret to share some of our answers. Like I actually wonder if we can figure out if the gae is multiball through the votes.
In post 537, Aristophanes wrote:Lmfao Drealmerz7.
Yes, I used your full name.
Take a step back yourself and read slowly.
Desperado is saying that this behaviour should be punished regardless of alignment. He doesn't care if it is town or scum. He isn't caring to make a read on it. It is punishable behaviour which he is going to punish.
This is called a policy lynch, and PLs are placed regardless of alignment.
Your lack of ability to understand this confounds me.