I really don't think that was the point I was trying to make. I think the point I was trying to make was that you didn't attempt to get an understanding of his actions or try to understand his thought process.In post 1148, Manuel87 wrote:It is true that i didnt interact with him until i mentioned my sr on him but the point you make is that i made a case without interacting with him.In post 1146, Alisae wrote:Naaaaaaah, you're misrepping me now.In post 1142, Manuel87 wrote:I explained my read on him when he asked me. You might want to read that part again before misreping it.
You never interacted with him up to the point where he asked for a case.
If I phrased it differently sorry, that's what I meant.
I gave the case when he asked me why he is in my scumreads.
Either way i dont see what is bad about developing a scumread on someone.
Please explain how it makes me scum when you dont even take your time to argue about my points on him.
And I'm not saying it's bad to develop a scumread. Like tbh I don't feel like you would have presented your case on him if he had not asked for it. The timing just seemed sorta awkward to me tbh.
And why would I defend Garry?
Jaack is scum.In post 1149, Transcend wrote:TldrIn post 1147, Alisae wrote:oh tldr for the Jaaaack shitcase.
1. Tone makes me feel uncomfortable with the slot.
2. Pushes Ram but then hops on the Pep wagon at the wrong time.
3. His attempts to indirectly pocket me and/or chainsawing me by pushing Ram
4. Attacking Ram for not really caring where his vote went where I felt like Jaack didn't really care where he put his votes as long sa it was on a scumread.
Yet again I end up doing the last point a lot as town so ehhhh.
