In post 288, EchoVision wrote:Dunn, you're mafia. You know how I know that? I'M THE COP. Last night, I decided to investigate loopdan because of his super quick vote within one or two posts of him being here.His result returned as mafia. If you were actually the cop Dunn, then how would two people get two different results on him? Is it because he's your partner and you don't want him getting killed by creating a fake investigation on him? If you were just a vanilla Townie, then what reason would you have to false claim cop?
If I get killed tonight, which seems pretty likely being that I'm the real cop, then you guys must vote for loopdan tomorrow, as he returned a mafia result from an investigation last night. I just feel like dunnstral would be a better vote at this time as they're both quite obviously mafia. GuiltyLion, I know you're innocent at this point, so I trust you in your lynch vote. Choose who you would rather lynch, and I will vote with you.
In post 293, EchoVision wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
Also, I'm not completely sure why still, but after my night one search on ecks dee, the game moderator said it came back with no result. Not innocent, not guilty. Just no result?
In post 298, EchoVision wrote:Yes, and you are confirmed as a mafia as well. So why don't you just tell us his exact role? Also, I like how I called you out saying that I investigated you and you didn't even argue the fact that I knew you were scum because you know that I'm the real cop
In post 300, EchoVision wrote:How was anything that I said confirming if Dunn is PR? He might be PR, but a mafia PR such as the roleblocker
In post 304, EchoVision wrote:What do you mean I know we're in the role blocker setup, there's a list of the roles on the first page...
In post 306, EchoVision wrote:On the first page, it has a list of the roles and it says there's a role blocker, therfore, yes there is a role blocker... This is my second game of forum mafia ever, the first game I played didn't even have a role blocker in it. My previous experience in something like this is Town of Salem where it straight out tells you that you were role blocked. I don't know why you're trying to turn this into a suspicion on me, it literally says on the first page that there is a role blocker in this set up... Have you read the mod posts?
In post 308, EchoVision wrote:Currently, the game is relying on you lol. So take your time and read carefully lol.
In post 311, EchoVision wrote:I investigated ecks dee night one because he hadn't really said much and I thought that the likelihood of him being framed would be very low just for the fact that he hadn't said much.
Echo this game:
In post 3088, EchoVision wrote:you've changed your vote like 4 fucking times even though you said that you were set on your vote. make up your mind.
In post 3089, EchoVision wrote:why are you so worried on killing blue, why don't we justIn post 3051, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:The intention of my post was to express that I think the Wraith wagon is a bad choice and we should reexamine Gin's wagon and fakeclaim to see if anything stands out as scummy. Ideally we look for a pool of blue mafia suspects today and lynch from in there in hopes that if we miss, red mafia will still shoot at our pool in hopes of hitting blue. We can look for red suspects too to try to direct blue's shots at red but it would be best to try to lynch blue today imoIn post 2992, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I feel like this wagon is ignoring the info Gin's fakeclaim gave us. Working on a wallpost about the votes onto Gin's wagon atm.
He proposed shooting amongst 6 players and 5 of those players ended up voting him, making up half of his lynch wagon. We know texcat was scum and was within Gin's sights. We should be examining the others' reasons for voting Gin to see if we can uncover a blue mafia member there, and looking at how others reacted to tex being a targetkill fucking mafia
In post 3090, EchoVision wrote:why are you so worried about knowing exactly what happened last night. texcat died, that's all we know, that's all we need. deal with it and move on.In post 3057, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:That's not how this works. You said my original post was inaccurate, but when I pointed out that I didn't see what was inaccurate about it and then explained the intentions behind my post like you asked, you never pointed out what was inaccurate about my post. I felt like your vote was unwarranted.In post 3053, Zachstralkita wrote:Of your original post, what of my response to it was unwarranted and what of my response to it was incorrect given the context
What about my post was inaccurate?
@Dunn I seriously doubt there's a real vig and even if there were one they could have just as easily ignored Gin's claim and shot him overnight instead of lynching him. I doubt that both Red Mafia and a Vig failed to kill last night, but it's possible that Blue and the Vig both shot at Texcat considering that slot's play yesterday around Gin and rb.
pedit: Gin's claim stunk tbh and I think whether people believed it or not given he flipped town is NAI as long as it's consistent with their reads of Gin before his claim.
In post 3092, EchoVision wrote:again, about 20 posts ago you said how when you put a vote in you intend for that vote to go through no matter what and you don't bother moving your vote around. I'm pretty sure I've seen you vote 2 or 3 people, and now you're saying how you'd lynch me too? if you're going to say shit like that, keep it straight with the lies you said before. It's the first rule in lying.In post 3070, Dunnstral wrote:I'd be willing to lynch echo
PEdit: oh okay now you're voting me? you know i'm onto your ass and you don't want me getting you lynched. you're easier to read than a dr seuss book dunn...
In post 3094, EchoVision wrote:okay so do I have anyone agreeing with me that bdsm_tokyo and dunn are both maf together?? anybody??
PEdit: okay fuck your meta shit... it means nothing... so what I'm acting different? shit changes boy... other than your role cause you're scum this game too