Best one yet! XDIn post 464, McMenno wrote:aren't we all
I know, but it's not just weak ass reads. That I get. It's a lack of engagement in the game that is pinging me!In post 469, drealmerz7 wrote:to me that is often how it goes on D1 though
I often get shit for weak-ass reads on D1 and I'm like "I can't fake having a stronger read when it's not there, it's early in the game, I'll be patient and let them develop"
In post 477, Aristophanes wrote:Take a read there. It's a quick Iso to do. Tell me what you see.
In post 228, Narna wrote:I think Dreal is being thrown by KT's aggressiveness. I think it would be really smaret to share some of our answers. Like I actually wonder if we can figure out if the gae is multiball through the votes.
In post 473, ɀefiend wrote:Way to be as vague as possible. I only cased one person, and they are doing a decent enough job of responding to my points that we are making progress. Your last statement is out of left field and makes no sense. If that statement was consistent with my mentality, then drealmerz would be my #1 scumread.
In post 480, Azral wrote:In post 473, ɀefiend wrote:Way to be as vague as possible. I only cased one person, and they are doing a decent enough job of responding to my points that we are making progress. Your last statement is out of left field and makes no sense. If that statement was consistent with my mentality, then drealmerz would be my #1 scumread.
I mean. Desperado basically said two things:
- McMemmo is scummy. (He is.)
- Any interaction between players can be studied, but focusing too much on the questionnaire gives scum an easy IIoA avenue. (This shouldn't be controversial.)
This led to you accusing him of confirmation bias, being dodgy, ignoring other wagons, not having reads and generally having a bad "methodology."
Doesn't feel genuine to me on D1.
In post 477, Aristophanes wrote:I know, but it's not just weak ass reads. That I get. It's a lack of engagement in the game that is pinging me!In post 469, drealmerz7 wrote:to me that is often how it goes on D1 though
I often get shit for weak-ass reads on D1 and I'm like "I can't fake having a stronger read when it's not there, it's early in the game, I'll be patient and let them develop"
Take a read there. It's a quick Iso to do. Tell me what you see.
In post 483, ɀefiend wrote:Ok, so you're not actually reading the game. You're skimming it and summarizing people's points to what you feel. I'm not going to engage you any further. If you want to have a nuanced conversation about it (like Desperado and I did) then I will try to work with you again.
In post 486, xyzzy wrote:"none of you have actually changed your votes since the last votecount," says the omnipotent voice in the sky, "but there's a couple of prods in the mod notes, so here's another votecount!"
"what the fuck is a votecount, and what the fuck is a mod notes," says everyone in exasperation simultaneously. it's actually pretty impressive.
"well," says the voice in the sky, "wait until I tell you about 'pedits'. that'll blow your minds."
mod notes: Gamma Emerald is V/LA until January 17 and has been prodded. Narna and Davsto have been prodded. p-edit: Davsto was able to post in the thread in the like 2 minutes between me sending the prod and making this post. good job, Davsto.
In post 491, Desperado wrote:Do you think scum are active or lurking?