I am sayingIn post 2414, drealmerz7 wrote:I really have a hard time following this - I can't see what you're thinkingIn post 2408, The DEO wrote:I do. I find it is the most plausible explanation for no scumkill. Except I don't think scum would shoot there.In post 2405, Vaxkiller wrote:DEO, you think lycan was vigged and NK'd?
To me the simplest explanation is Drealmerz is lying.
~~Math
you say "no scumkill" but then, by your logic, isn't lycan the scumkill and I'm lying about my vig timing?
what is my lie? ugh this is realllly frusrtating
MB, check yourself if you're town, I think you just get lost on crazy theories to explain things
to me this just feels like scum pushing an agenda hardcore though
Scum submit you to do kill on player X.
You vig Lycanfire for cred.
Lycanfire having you as a top scumread redirects all your actions to him. Since you claimed killing role and based on thread meta he was likely being mislynched.
Therefore the scum kill and vig kill went to Lycanfire and Drealmerz is a scum vig.