Open 665 - Friends and Enemies - Game Over! Town Victory!!!

ConManMick · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:05 am

In post 669, Hawk wrote:
In post 666, ConManMick wrote:Having played with BBT before I can see this reaction coming from him as town

Holy shit where did you come from!!

But seriously please weigh in here. Also Meta is NAI.... sulking after this scenario is easily done by town and scum....

How do you feel about BBT before this?
What's your reads look like?

I have like 1000 questions but just start posting content please CMM

In terms of BBT, I liked his play this far. It reminded me of a game we played ages ago, I think it was an ice and fire multiball, or else a game I was in at the same time, I'll have to have a look. His style is aggressive tunnelling, IMO. I have a good feeling about him and would not lynch that slot today. I also played with him as my partner in my first ever scum game so I'll check out our old PT and that game, see if anything looks familiar.
To address my absence, I've been travelling a lot and splitting my attention when I can across several things. I'll try sort this out. I know someone had a question for me a few pages back but I can't see it, if they'd care to throw that back to me I'll get on it. Give me a bit and I'll do ye one better with an aul reads list.

ConManMick · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:24 am

In post 231, mozamis wrote:
In post 188, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:where is fitz 'genuinely' scum hunting?
yeah, havent seen anything massively town yet fromFitz.

Touching on my earlier comments re: Moz - this seemed kind of opportunistic. I had been reading fitz as town, so I guess that sort of tripped me up. His early posts are very much filler, and there's something very buddy-buddy about the style that rankles me. I could lynch this. I'm going to read read fitz too, see if I still stand in the same place on it.

ConManMick · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:32 am

I think I could happily put hawk and fitz in a basket of off-limits to lynch for the time being. They both kind of tick my boxes for suitable town play, engaging, providing lots of clarity with what they do etc. Not to say they couldn't be very cautious scum. Anyway, could anyone scum reading these two (because I vaguely remember seeing it written somewhere) give me a concise version of their reasons?

ConManMick · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:34 am

In post 7, Empking wrote:
Vote: Having
- I laughed at con's joke.

This is town

tojam2 · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:37 am

To clarify, no BBT was NOT lynched.

VC 1.11

BlueBloodedToffee (L-2) - Alisae, Antihuman, boring, Hawk, Lil Uzi Vert
mozamis (L-5) - ex-FancyPants, BlueBloodedToffee
Hawk (L-6) - havingfitz
Alisae (L-6) - Empking
ConManMick (L-6) - mozamis

NV (3) - SnarkySnowman, ConManMick, -Grey-

(expired on 2017-01-25 11:09:00)

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:37 am

Based VC!

ConManMick · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:48 am

I'll take
VOTE: Mozamis

Empking · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:30 am

I didn't get the BBT wagon, but

In post 622, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Lol.

Whoever is town on my wagon you should be embarrassed.

This was awful.

Alisae · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:34 am

Hawk · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:39 am

General questions I want answered from specific people. I'll reference some posts for clarity afterwords if I have too.

@ Alisae you still think BBT is scum who's buddies with him? What did you think about Uzi's certainty on the hammer then a call for you to be looked at tomorrow?

@Uzi. Why should we look at Ali tomorrow? You never answered AH Aabout that you just said cause BBT was hammered.

@Grey do you always use Fake hammers as reaction tests cause I swear to God I saw it this time, but last time and if this is your MO imma never be able to take you seriously when we play lol. Also side note. Considering LUV said he read up on our game don't you think it's a bit strange he kinda fell for the fake hammer?

@CMM What do you think of the people involved right around the time of the fake hammer. (Grey, Ali, LUV). Note that Ali really wasn't apart of it he just happened to unvote to prevent derphammer and then revoted when he got the claim I don't really read that one way or the other since I can understand that reasoning.

Alisae · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:41 am

Eww pre-flip associations. DISGUSTING LAD!
If people want to re-evaluate me they are so welcome to do so.

Hawk · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:44 am

In post 685, Alisae wrote:Eww pre-flip associations. DISGUSTING LAD!
If people want to re-evaluate me they are so welcome to do so.

Forgive me for the wall between my thought process and yours. I understand leaning BBT scum, who are your other top scum leans if not BBT or along with BBThe. that's all I'm asking.

Alisae · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:45 am

Empking.
Also BBT's AtE is shit.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:00 am

I didn't want to say why Ali should be looked at tomorrow because I wanted to prevent him from asking how he should deal with being reevaluated during the night.

Now that I know BBT wasn't hammered and will most likely be replaced, I'll say so now. I didn't like how Ali acted when I put BBT at L-1. He gave me a fairly generic answer for why he unvoted and then implied he wanted more out of the day. Doesn't do anything to accomplish that and immediately votes BBT again after he claims VT, mind you, without stating intent or giving everyone a chance to discuss the claim.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:10 am

I'm not being replaced. I'm not putting anyone else in this shitty position.

Y'all are just gonna have to waste a lynch on me.

ConManMick · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:15 am

In post 684, Hawk wrote:
@CMM What do you think of the people involved right around the time of the fake hammer. (Grey, Ali, LUV). Note that Ali really wasn't apart of it he just happened to unvote to prevent derphammer and then revoted when he got the claim I don't really read that one way or the other since I can understand that reasoning.

I like -Grey- and LUV's play, I reckon for today they are town and I'm not willing to lynch them by any means stretch. As for Ali, all I can say about his play is it's just very... Zero fucks given, or something. Can't sort him. I'd sooner lynch than not for a bit of peace of mind.

havingfitz · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:16 am

In post 689, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not being replaced. I'm not putting anyone else in this shitty position.

You're not in a "shitty position." You're just being an immature ass. Are you 13?

So BBT=policy lynch now. Copy.

VOTE: BBT

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:30 am

Any hammers about?

mozamis · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:58 am

got sidetracked.
I doubt I'll hammer cos i thought you were town a few days ago, unless something drastic happened.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:58 am

Something super drastic happened.

ConManMick · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:59 am

Sigh. Disappointed with this, but I'll hammer if no one objects to get it over and done with

mozamis · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:59 am

In post 534, Alisae wrote:I'm convinced BBT v Hawk is TvS. Can't figure out who the scum is in this situation.
So I'ma just sheep this
VOTE: Hawk

This is scummy as fuck.
"Lets give the hawk wagon real momentum and pretend its just derp!".
No. Opportunistic.

VOTE ALISAE

mozamis · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:04 am

In post 582, Hawk wrote:I say that its his MO, because for me the few games I've played with Ali, this is how he plays.

yeah but he does he do that kinda vote above?

mozamis · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:05 am

ok so is the main case on BBT thta he contradicted himself about Hawk coasting?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 8:07 am

Yep. And it wasn't a contradiction. There were other points to what I said but Anti cut it short.