Mafiascum.net

ISO · Post **#2625** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:38 pm

sarcasm ofc lol

im not going to lay down and play against towns wincon here. d2 was a different story, now it is time for Serious Business -- and the business is lynching scum, not lynching weak town.

ISO · Post **#2626** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:43 pm

can you say a different thing than that please

ISO · Post **#2627** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:47 pm

than which part? the lynching business is true.

the sarcasm part was too. idk what you want me to say differently there? or why?

ISO · Post **#2628** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:49 pm

In post 2627, cassielle wrote:the lynching business is true.

useless and quite iterative, if true

ISO · Post **#2629** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:52 pm

I want to do something here. Schadd, can you vote Cass? I promise I won't hammer before you post your shit.

ISO · Post **#2630** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:54 pm

VOTE: cassielle

ISO · Post **#2631** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:54 pm

VOTE: Cassielle

Sorry but this needed done.

ISO · Post **#2632** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:55 pm

In post 473, cassielle wrote:and GAYreen said but did not act upon. in fact said she wouldnt feel right doing it, implying it wasnt a situation worthy of it. it was a lot of sheeping and looking for gold stars imo, which is common for noobs in general. slightly anti-town? sure. active scummy? not so much.

In post 628, cassielle wrote:wrt my scumread on mbg: scrutinize his readlists fromstart to finish and check vote patterns too. sheepy from start to finish, rapidchange in reads between first 2 lists, but backs off a wagon with a strong general scumread (that he agrees on) on it at l-1. could be noob cold feet, but still leans scum imo

gayreen and mbg were very similar at this point (restrained about voting, sheepy) but it's not scummy for gayreen

In post 485, cassielle wrote:its pretty generally agreed GAYreen is obv noobtown afaict

ewwww

In post 492, cassielle wrote:something to think about tho for my scumreads: me calling you out is a chance for you to get yourselves off the hook. i am not tunneling in on you, i am aggressively pursuing players who ping my scumdar heavily. this is a chance for you to convince me those were misfires, and i am not an unreasonable person. scum will find my questions difficult. town knows why they do things, they should not have much trouble with them.

egh. first of all, a lot of this general description of how alignments act is yucky, sorta like IIoA. secondly, this attitude as a whole is much more useful for scum than town, since it works as a deus ex machina for your reads and sorta pushes accountability onto the people being asked questions, esp. since you can say, for example, "you didn't address my concerns." while, incidentally, calling me someone hyperdefensive for trying to go through the motions and answer questions/explain why they're bad. incidentally, after saying that i someone answered the questions reasonably and is seeming more null.

i called her out on the contradiction, incidentally, and she didn't really acknowledge it.

In post 880, cassielle wrote:and you sure are hyperdefensive. vote for you = scum instantly? why? why is scumreading you scummy?

and also didn't read the rest of the line wherein i suggested that with her, sarcastically. if you're referring to the thing with gayreen, "scum instantly" is a massive misrepresentation.

880 is a wonderful post, isn't it.

In post 880, cassielle"why is your vote the same exact vote as post #7? why has that not moved? its safe to say the wagon has stalled, in fact, on multiple separate occasions. do you really believe in that vote that much? do you truly have that much conviction in it? where do you get that conviction from a 23 post ISO which is devoid of content?[/quote]
i called this out D2
[quote="In post 974, cassielle wrote:(though tb looked p undeniably like scum)

though i could have called it out d1

In post 866, cassielle wrote:im feeling scum in tb and schadd_ stronger than shade or p much ANYONE else except rask

In post 703, -Grey- wrote:
In post 678, cassielle wrote:538: contentless expression of confusion at one of rask's lists. #

HE LISTED HIMSELF AS LYNCHABLE YOU FUCKING CLOWN

so, that's the dumbest overreaction i've ever seen. i somewhat feel as though the goal is to give a sense of distancing moreso than to get people to vote for her.

i don't think their argument is a strong point against the team.

ISO · Post **#2633** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:55 pm

yeah, saw it coming. posted what i had

ISO · Post **#2634** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm

I guess I'm not QUITE as subtle as I thought I was.

ISO · Post **#2635** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:56 pm

well, what else would you have done?

ISO · Post **#2636** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:57 pm

i didn't stop being town

ISO · Post **#2637** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:57 pm

jfc. welp gg town

ISO · Post **#2638** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:57 pm

ISO · Post **#2639** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:57 pm

Uhh. I had the idea of using the threat of an immediate hammer to get an immediate gut response to a few things but I decided against it.

ISO · Post **#2640** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:58 pm

In post 2637, cassielle wrote:jfc. welp gg town

gg. you actually did a really good job and I think this could have easily gone the other way.

ISO · Post **#2641** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:58 pm

well you threw the game for town, unless youre scum

in which case great job!

p-edit ROFL no im not scum

ISO · Post **#2642** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 6:59 pm

well, flip em up

ISO · Post **#2643** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:00 pm

I'll wait for a flip before I come to any conclusions.

ISO · Post **#2644** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:02 pm

not like it matters, im lynched, you hammered town

changing your mind at this point is nothing more than realizing the game is thrown, because it is

i need alcohol

ISO · Post **#2645** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:22 pm

I wanted to make a writeup but I don't know what the flip is going to be so that makes this such a pain in the butt.

ISO · Post **#2646** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:57 pm

Can I post yet?

ISO · Post **#2647** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:06 pm

yeah probably

ISO · Post **#2648** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:06 pm

well, maybe

ISO · Post **#2649** (ISO) » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:06 pm

rc & i aren't partners, unfortunately

Mafiascum.net

Newbie 1769: Happy New Year! (Post-Game)