![Cheerful Smile :]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png)
Its what cool kids do these days!
In post 2797, Firebringer wrote:
friend, i don't think its wise for us to get into conversations into this game.
if you would like to talk about other stuff not related to game i am fine with that.
like hows your day going?
In post 2845, Alisae wrote:They could have been faking the softs?
In post 2847, Anotora wrote:Mandy's softclaims were the first investigative role claims of the whole game, though...
In post 2803, PantherPunt wrote:@FA I have a 10 week old..how old is your little one? Hope the headaches get better.
In post 2850, Alisae wrote:Did Pep ever confirm it either?
In post 2856, Alisae wrote:there actually isn't any point to attempt to find and lynch the rb if we have a watcher.
In post 2867, Alisae wrote:So we lynch Pep to see if it is a gambit or if it's real.
In post 2898, mlmooney89 wrote:Your wifom right now isn't what I'm concerned about so the risk of clearing it seems a waste of power. But that's just my opinion because I don't think you are scum enough to bother clearing you.
In post 2927, Alisae wrote:pedit: To be fair, this game has proven that it is 100% acceptable to be voting for yourself.
In post 2929, Alisae wrote:True or false: It is acceptable to vote conf town.
In post 3023, RadiantCowbells wrote:That's not a slip at all jfc for the love of Annie Hastur.
In post 3077, Anotora wrote:Let's start off with the super easy things to pick off. In #2724, Panther makes a brief case for Garmr-scum. Thirteen minutes later, there's "very little reason" to question Garmr. Panther is now ready to blindly follow Garmr's investigation and lynch Pepcho, who he had called a very likely town wagon thirteen minutes ago in #2724. Actually, forget I said thirteen minutes. Post #2728 tells us that his whole change of heart about Pepcho and Garmr changes not in thirteen minutes, but rather in the span of only six minutes. Isn't it amazing how quick Panther's opinions can change? To me, this is Panther having absolutely no conviction about him. He didn't even need time to think about whether he believed Garmr's claim or not. All he needed to know was that the town believes Garmr's claim, therefore he should back right off of Garmr and jump onto Pepcho's wagon, which he sees as a very safe place to be.
In post 3082, RadiantCowbells wrote:Every player I am going to lynch is scum, some of them just aren't mafia.
In post 3084, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 3077, Anotora wrote:Let's start off with the super easy things to pick off. In #2724, Panther makes a brief case for Garmr-scum. Thirteen minutes later, there's "very little reason" to question Garmr. Panther is now ready to blindly follow Garmr's investigation and lynch Pepcho, who he had called a very likely town wagon thirteen minutes ago in #2724. Actually, forget I said thirteen minutes. Post #2728 tells us that his whole change of heart about Pepcho and Garmr changes not in thirteen minutes, but rather in the span of only six minutes. Isn't it amazing how quick Panther's opinions can change? To me, this is Panther having absolutely no conviction about him. He didn't even need time to think about whether he believed Garmr's claim or not. All he needed to know was that the town believes Garmr's claim, therefore he should back right off of Garmr and jump onto Pepcho's wagon, which he sees as a very safe place to be.
O.O
Your serious aren't you?
In post 3077, Anotora wrote:In post #2727, when Panther believes that the Gamma is the watcher with the claim of seeing Pepcho target -Grey-, this is his tune on Pepcho: "So if it was a watch you don't actually know that's what killed him, you just know pep visited. so I'm assuming pep claimed something else?" Very defensive, you see.
In post 3107, Firebringer wrote:pepcho still avoiding this thread lol
In post 3108, RadiantCowbells wrote:If it were me I would just meme up the thread until town gave up and lynched me.
In post 4040, Srceenplay wrote:Again sorry town. I saw the hints but thought I was over thinking it. Mandy's claim and NA looked suspicious.
Question, with fire claiming miller why didn't we policy lynch him instead of anotora? If no one was going to lynch Pep should that have been the action?
In post 4065, RadiantCowbells wrote:I was nawt being stupid
In post 4067, Elena Fisher wrote:Can I ask what happened? I didn't read D1 at all
In post 4081, Firebringer wrote:In post 4080, Frozen Angel wrote:thats low or whatever
you were intentioanlly lurking D1 - your content were ehh
I even pushed you twice during D1 and D2 and I only put you in town pile because of ML soft cop claims. There was no fucking way I would let you live if I wasn't sure about ML being town
and Screen bought that I was townreading you over ML? Jeez
I WAS ON A ROAD TRIP AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS GAME.
I ALSO ENDED THE GAME WITH 356 POSTS.
In post 4091, Elena Fisher wrote:Fire you did well for the cards we were given and how town acted through the game don't let anyone tell you dif.
Pedit: You are being very rude if you don't want to admit that so be it.
In post 4093, Firebringer wrote:In post 4090, Frozen Angel wrote:My critisizm are all constructive
If you want to be constructive, you are supposed to be telling me some things I can do to not have these problems occur again.
For example, when you tell me "you need to post more content" you should follow up with a "like provide more posts like (example)"
So if you want to tell me whats bad, you have to tell me what the steps you can improve on that.
You weren't doing that.
In post 4096, Firebringer wrote:Part of constructive criticism is going to the knees and then putting out a hand to help them get back up Frozen.
In post 4102, Firebringer wrote:its alright, its a game.
I know i didn't play this perfectly.
theres always room for improvement.
I am just upset at the way its gone about.
W/e.
In post 4100, Elena Fisher wrote:It's very easy to tell what someone's role is with gy bias even if you don't think you are being bias as in "oh this post is obv scummy" when you may not find that post scummy say if you had no info/alive
In post 4137, RadiantCowbells wrote:I actually didn't I was just planning to deal with the situation later if I wasn't nightkilled since I figured if I opposed SAJ I would get lynched day 1 and that's not cool.