In post 76, Cooperative Sheep wrote:Baaaaa
Vote: Intermission
I could also lynch Sesq (for coming across stilted to me, which, to stave off the inevitable question - is also how Intermission feels.)
I like Siblings and Jester for town.
I read through the thread, this vote absolutely stinks. I understand pressure wagons, and RVS votes do tend to build up a little wagon with people jumping on willy nilly, but this point of the thread, I feel that the game was getting beyond RVS and starting to get serious, then you jump onto the biggest wagon at the time, with no reason apart from sheeping.
In post 85, Cooperative Sheep wrote:
Jester basically asked a couple of questions that seemed actually likely to get real conversation going (probing at the RQS and the RNG).
Sesq - I'd advocate you go look at his current iso and just ask yourself what real info he's offered about himself thus far, and what actual opinion about anything game relevant he's made (my opinion would be zip and zilch for both). The play feels fake and guarded, and not like he wants to solve anything.
In post 83, ECMitchell wrote:Cooperative Sheep, is there anything in particular about Siblings Quarrel and The_Jester that strike you as town reads?
For Jester see above.
For Siblings, I really liked post #68, it read like a legit inquiry with some consideration behind it and less like noise.
I read that post #68 and failed to see how or why you could town read someone based on that post out of the others they've posted. I think I can agree with Fro99er on this one.
I don't think it's a scum claim. I can see why they said that, I'd be in the same boat. If someone isn't willing to discuss anything or go further into detail then your either uncooperative town, or scum.