VOTE: Jaack
As someone who was socrates in 6th grade for a trial and persuaded the school to not kill me, this deeply offends me.
Your pvp skills are bad, plebIn post 28, McMenno wrote:your mom's a bit stiff
Uhmm, non sequitur?In post 61, Socrates wrote:Scum hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see the winds of the town.
Young town try to comment on claims like mine because they feel like it's important, so they should say something.
Old town hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see how I follow up. Am I just trying to get people to read me, or am I looking for reads?
At least one of the players voting Alban is scum.
So vote him?
Scum voting you would be like voting someone for claiming miller: That is dumb.In post 65, Socrates wrote:Here are the winds of the town: Alban said something stupid about my claim. POUNCE! Scum didn't vote me, they voted Alban. There's a light chance that he's very flighty scum that said what he said, but that makes it even more likely that one of his buddies would make sure to get a vote on him early.In post 62, Dwlee99 wrote:Uhmm, non sequitur?In post 61, Socrates wrote:Scum hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see the winds of the town.
Young town try to comment on claims like mine because they feel like it's important, so they should say something.
Old town hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see how I follow up. Am I just trying to get people to read me, or am I looking for reads?
At least one of the players voting Alban is scum.
I am looking at the players that are surrounding the wagon and prodding at them. This isn't that complicated.
Note that Not_Mafia was the first to vote Alban. Silently.
Well if you look at the very next post..In post 83, All Alone wrote:why is that question alignment indicative?In post 51, Dwlee99 wrote:It is a negative utility role, you claim it in your first post, full stop. Unless you have extremely good reason to, you have to do it in your first post, it is like a miller. That isnt even why Im voting you, though, Im voting you because who the heck asks "Are we still in RVS?" outside of your first games.
In post 52, Dwlee99 wrote:It is like you were trying to alleviate pressure on your slot by asking any question to seem useful.
Now, if he maybe expanded on that or explained his reasoning for believing prana was posturing, that wouldIn post 111, alban wrote:No, he isn't. He is posturing.
He calls my arguments juvenile, doesn't say why they are juvenile, and then votes me cause.. why? And if you'll notice he's doing this to the main pushers of his wagon (you and me) to discredit us and alleviate pressure on his slot. That is why it is "throwing shade" as opposed to scumhunting.In post 53, alban wrote:'Like' being the operative word. Conjecture.
I didn't feel any pressure. So there's no question about alleviating it.
Your arguments are quite juvenile.
VOTE: dwlee
You aren't even aware of why I'm scumreading you, so how can you assign any meaning to my scum read? Scumreading people who scumread you is not scummy, but having bad reasons and silly arguments as to your scum read is scummy, especially when in an OMGUS manner.In post 171, PimHel wrote:Aaaaww, how sweet. Talking about pushbacks, yet you're doing the same by naming the players who are suspecting you as suspects.
Nope1. The one with a scummy argument is you. You took alban's post, disected it andused one sentence out of its context to call him scummy.
Eh, fair enough.Alban checked if we were still in RVS, mentioned in that same post that the vote against him probably wasn't random and asked the voter why he voted Alban. In other words, the whole post was to question a vote. Not to alleviate pressure by asking quenstions to look useful.
What response to socrates? Can you quote posts so I know what you're even talking about?2. Your response to Socrates is terrible. Socrates posted twice about his claim. The next post is about the Alban wagon. So his vote and him mentioning scum on the wagon didn't 'come out of nowhere'. Soft-jab spotted.
I'm saying it doesn't logically follow. Like, he talks about some stuff, then just says "Scum is on alban wagon!" and then votes not mafia, but considering his "Scum on alban wagon" thing didn't logically follow it kinda comes out of nowhere. I don't understand this point at all?In post 171, PimHel wrote:2. Your response to Socrates is terrible. Socrates posted twice about his claim. The next post is about the Alban wagon. So his vote and him mentioning scum on the wagon didn't 'come out of nowhere'. Soft-jab spotted.
That is not the whole thing, I've already said my problems with alban's posting, you can look at my iso for that.In post 179, Socrates wrote:@Dwlee, as far as I can tell, you entire case against Alban is that you don't like the feel of his posts and the fact that he is pushing back on you. Let's see a real case out of you, yeah?
No, you said stuff completely unrelated to whether or not the wagon had scum on it or not.In post 182, Socrates wrote:"Says some stuff"
"didn't logically follow"
You didn't understand my words, and maybe this is my fault, but at least admit that it might have been on you to grasp what I was saying.
In post 51, Dwlee99 wrote:It is a negative utility role, you claim it in your first post, full stop. Unless you have extremely good reason to, you have to do it in your first post, it is like a miller. That isnt even why Im voting you, though, Im voting you because who the heck asks "Are we still in RVS?" outside of your first games.
In post 52, Dwlee99 wrote:It is like you were trying to alleviate pressure on your slot by asking any question to seem useful.
In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:I would argue that is feeling some type of pressure.
In post 91, Dwlee99 wrote:Le Pro Tip: trying to alleviate pressure on your slot by asking any question to seem useful is scummy
In post 115, Dwlee99 wrote:Lurking out the wagon and hoping some town fucks up won't help you here, alban.
In post 116, Dwlee99 wrote:You're just throwing shade at people making cases against you and it is really funny. You say prana is posturing yet your vote is on me, despite me clarifying my reasoning (which you said was "juvenile") and not adding anything to it. It is subtle OMGUS.
In post 117, Dwlee99 wrote:you not adding anything*
In post 135, Dwlee99 wrote:He's throwing shade because he isn't pointing out anything actually scummy or scumhunting. Here's the difference.
Alban saidNow, if he maybe expanded on that or explained his reasoning for believing prana was posturing, that wouldIn post 111, alban wrote:No, he isn't. He is posturing.notbe "throwing shade."
Instead he has just said 'No, they're posturing' which doesn't explainanything.
In addition, here is his post where he votes meHe calls my arguments juvenile, doesn't say why they are juvenile, and then votes me cause.. why? And if you'll notice he's doing this to the main pushers of his wagon (you and me) to discredit us and alleviate pressure on his slot. That is why it is "throwing shade" as opposed to scumhunting.In post 53, alban wrote:'Like' being the operative word. Conjecture.
I didn't feel any pressure. So there's no question about alleviating it.
Your arguments are quite juvenile.
VOTE: dwlee
In post 165, Dwlee99 wrote:I did have a reason when I voted you, it is in the post where I voted. My case grows against you, yes, but it isnt post-facto reasoning.
Your repeated attempts to paint me as scummy with silly arguments is the main reason Im scumreading you. especially since it is a pushback from my push on you.
In post 174, Dwlee99 wrote:I think it is odd that Alban didn't just say that he was wondering why someone voted him. His entire behavior since being wagonned has been off, I don't know enough about his posting habits to say absolutely conclusively, but his reduction in posting especially when close to lynch rubs me the wrong way.
I literally just dont understand what youre trying to sayIn post 190, Socrates wrote:Jesus christ, Dwlee, you have yet again failed to understand the words that I am saying to you. And you are apparently incapable of conceiving of this being because of anything other than my logic being nonsensical whilst yours is perfect and cohesive and clear to all around you.
You are either scum or a belligerent, dense, AND arrogant townie.
I find myself hoping it's the former.
and since nothing short of a prod is going to get Not_Mafia to post,
VOTE: Dwlee
I'm out until other people decide to start chiming in.
This is the post we have been talking about as pim hel didnt like my response to it. Your claim that scum is on the wagon is a one-liner out of nowhere and not mafia isnt even in the post beforeIn post 61, Socrates wrote:Alban is more interested in having fun than in playing well.
Scum hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see the winds of the town.
Young town try to comment on claims like mine because they feel like it's important, so they should say something.
Old town hang back from a claim like mine and watch to see how I follow up. Am I just trying to get people to read me, or amIlooking for reads?
At least one of the players voting Alban is scum.
Prana's is the strongest articulated vote. Dwlee is applying pressure as he should, but Alban is making it easy for him so that doesn't mean much.
@Gin: Do you think Alban is scummy, or just being dumb?
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Mcmenno and random hardly ever give explanations for anything regardless of alignment.In post 188, alban wrote:Seems like a complete 180 degrees turn.In post 185, Dwlee99 wrote:Acting confident helps get out of RVS by starting a wagon, I was not super sure Alban was scum. I'm taking a step back to reexamine his slot and maybe give him time to get it together if he is town but I don't want to advance his wagon atm.
While you are on the backfoot and introspecting, try answering why you are satisfied with no explanations from people on my wagon, while you were pushing me for lack of explanations.
In post 85, eagerSnake wrote:Most roles,but not all roles, can be found here viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12368
If you have any questions about anything PM me
In post 245, Socrates wrote:Because the game draws from chatbot mafia, and even with an original role or two, it would be out of place for a role to not at least theoretically fit in with the rest.In post 242, Dwlee99 wrote:I dont see why post restriction isnt possible.
Maybe the Mod gave a player a crippling post restriction just to break that expectation.
I doubt it.
In post 247, Socrates wrote:If Not_Mafia tried to communicate having a restriction earlier than he did, maybe I would be willing to play ball, but what is his restriction even supposed to be, Dwlee?
His post restriction would be voting players in the game only. I can see a bunch of ways to get around it, like VOTE: pimHELIn post 249, Socrates wrote:I mean, let's face it, its more like that he's a jester in this particular game.
Maybe he's a fucking jester.
Jesus.
I have made a mistake.
Kill me.
Day killer! Whoever you are! Shoot me! Me!