In post 74, Froggaphant wrote:
Are you seriously asking this. Scum obviously. We are hoping we wi this as scum. Jesus fuck.
it's a question to see how you respond, obviously
In post 74, Froggaphant wrote:
Why are you even asking this? Just to have something to say? Or is it essential for you to know why that was obviously Bella? It just looks like you are saying this to look busy without actually saying anything that's relevant to the game.
[/quote]
I don't understand the issue here. I don't understand why you don't just answer the question. You said it was obvious, it was not obvious to me. I want to know what you were thinking when you made the post. It's not "ESSENTIAL" and you making it seem so is also "off." Is it a hard thing to answer, is it a hard thing to understand why I want to undertand it? It seems like you're the one posting shit to post shit without actually having a reason. Again. If you're not going to talk about the content you post, we're going to have a problem.
In post 75, Froggaphant wrote:
I really don't think you have anything useful to ask at this point.
VOTE: Dreal
it's useful for me (and others I think) to see how people respond to such questions
and to be clear, since
you
think I have nothing useful to ask, you think that means I'm scum? can you lay out your thought process here for me?
In post 79, Froggaphant wrote: In post 37, drealmerz7 wrote:There was no tone to read, so you trying to fabricate me giving an analysis on a tone-read that doesn't exist, is "leading" at best, scummy at worst.
No, they want to know what an example of what a tone read would be. Because it looos like you just ask those questions to ask them and then bullshit around with it being to tone read reactions.
I'm pretty sure they are town just for this line of questioning alone.
you can read their mind? why are you speaking for them? if they weren't satisfied with my answer they can say so
if you have issue with what I said, YOU say so, you don't take on their view and come at me, that is scummy as fuck, like you don't have an issue but you'll make use of someone else's that you don't hold because you're making a push on me and "hey let's pile on some shit" is what it seems like to me
In post 80, Froggaphant wrote:
And how exactly does that help you sort our alignment in what was obviously RVS?
first of all, I don't RVS, RVS is a shitty part of the game used by scum to get away with scummy things and build wifom piles for later - you dismissing my concerns as irrelevant because they're part of the game that you want to be seen as irrelevant, is scummy
what's so hard about answering the question, anyway?
In post 82, Froggaphant wrote: In post 40, drealmerz7 wrote:well you're a master shit-poster of non-content who often times to me seems to have trouble comprehending the gamestate, so I'm not surprised it's a little much for you a little fast, but it's how I roll - game is on, what's the dillydally? we don't need 50 pages of shit, in fact, 50 pages of shit makes the game HARDER for town (that' a pro-tip for you)
This is such a terrible generalization of Ali's play.
I just finished a hydra game with Ali where we voted all three scum on D1 and Ali was the initial one to point out exactly why the person we ended up lynching was scum.
We were on fucking point. Perfect town win.
good for you
to me, it's a complete accurate assessment of their play, and not a generalization at all, based on my experience with them
In post 82, Froggaphant wrote: In post 40, drealmerz7 wrote:well you're a master shit-poster of non-content who often times to me seems to have trouble comprehending the gamestate, so I'm not surprised it's a little much for you a little fast, but it's how I roll - game is on, what's the dillydally? we don't need 50 pages of shit, in fact, 50 pages of shit makes the game HARDER for town (that' a pro-tip for you)
This is such a terrible generalization of Ali's play.
I just finished a hydra game with Ali where we voted all three scum on D1 and Ali was the initial one to point out exactly why the person we ended up lynching was scum.
We were on fucking point. Perfect town win.
that sounds like luck to me - and anyway, it's not a "terrible generalization" - it's an accurate assessment based on my experience with him in multiple games - so your experienec is different than mine, share your experience and talk with me - instead of make scummy posts trying to paint me as scummy for my perspectives
no, and now I just think you're scum because the post is right fucking there quoted in #82 and yet you're misrepping it hardcore -
I said "50 pages of shit makes the game HARDER for town (that' a pro-tip for you)" - like, how blatant can you get?!
In post 85, Froggaphant wrote:
This is a terrible vote.
Xanth is painfully obviously town. I strongly townread things both heads have said.
this is a terrible post
xanth is NOT painfully obvious town, or, if they are to you, you aren't expressing why or engaging with me in a healthy pro-town "we see things differently let's talk about them" way - whoopie dooo, you have a strong townread on both heads - I don't. ...what's so fucking hard here?
you are not explaining a single fucking thing you're saying
In post 89, Froggaphant wrote: In post 62, drealmerz7 wrote:all I've done is made observations and asked questions, you "pushing" that I've done anything else is scummy
Then i must be scummy too because I've pointed out a whole bunch of "anything else" that you've done.
no you're scummy because you aren't explaining why you think what I say is bad and you're just using phraseology to try and paint a picture instead of discussion to actually allow a picture to form
In post 90, Froggaphant wrote: In post 63, drealmerz7 wrote:interesting how the thread has been dead, but then I post something, playing the game and making content, and you're hovering around apparently, ready to scum-read whatever I post
"Playing the game and making content" doesn't make you town.
this is a terrible post
AGAIN you aren't SAYING ANYTHING
address the things I've said, explain why you think what you think
caught up to #94