vollkan wrote:Vote: Ryan
Because you quoted you got pissed off and quoted your role PM in Mini 495
Because you were you got scum pm and beat me and were scum and post goodly.
<3!
P.s. Vollkan has no scumtells, kill Vollkan now
vollkan wrote:Vote: Ryan
Because you quoted you got pissed off and quoted your role PM in Mini 495
Umm, If Jess was scum, she'd know you were town or SK (and if you were the SK would you really correct her?)LTG wrote:If Jess was not cop, he would have had to have guessed I was town. I am town, so there is no ploy of one scum buddy trying to help another out.
NO! There was already a claimed cop and no guarentee of a doc. Why would ANOTHER cop claim be benefical when then likely 1 or no docs would have to protect them BOTH.Vollkan wrote:First off, I ask myself "Wouldn't Justin have claimed asap if he had a guilty?"
I assumed the "two Coinflips"SSF wrote:If Cops were assigned dependently, that is, 33% of 0 Cops, 33% of 1 Cop and 33% of 2 Cops, then the chance of there being 2 Cops given the existence of at least 1 is the same as the chance of there being only 1 (50%). 50% is more than 33%.
I didn't think of it that way, I saw it as two coinflips, in which a second cop is not influenced by the existance of the first cop. (i.e. 1/2 cop 1, 1/2 cop 2. Therefore 1/4 both cops. 1/2 one cop. 1/4 no cops) In which the existance of one cop decreses the chance of there being two cops (sort of).Flea wrote:how exactly does this make you doubtful?
I did not consider this. /Retract.farside wrote:Why would you assume that when he didn't vote for either one of us.
Ah, it just seems like a lot of effort for scum to actually JUMP on a wagon that is already going to deadline lynch. I see what you mean though, its quite a jump.Shteven wrote:It's not only that he hammered, but also the way he did it.
THIS is a good point, he searched for a reason, the guilty mind.Vollkan wrote:The important thing here is that the reason he finds for hammering is something very dodgy.
Now, to me, this just looks newbie. Like he was following the crowd more.Spacecase wrote:And adding to my point is (correct me if im wrong) that volkan even said he was a decent lynch
Phate wrote:I don't think randomly lynching among people the cop talked about is a good idea, Oman.
I'm shocked you take that position.Shteven wrote:His day 2 discussion was on[/b], Kab, and farside22.Phate
Damn I hate to talk before the person has answered. but this actually references a previous point. I think its newbie.Vollkan wrote:I fail to see how my thoughts on this are relevant at all to your actions.
There is no haste. My point is (as farside put it better) that its not growing at an ecceptional speed.madcrawdad wrote:Oman, I think the issue that folks may have with the wagon's speed, is that 'haste makes waste.'
This looks like scumbuddies to me.MCD wrote:While there's a good chance that Spacecase is scum, giving him a chance to defend himself is probably more prudent than just lynching him for lurking.
Two reasons. Vollkan put it better, and by that time he was already lurking.MCD wrote:why wasn't it interesting when you weren't buying it in your response to Shteven?
Since when can newbies not be scum? I felt the reversal was NOT a newbie scumtell, I felt lurking was.MCD wrote:So, you say multiple times that you believe that SC is just a newb, but then turn around and vote him for lurking?
Look, town or scum, it doesn't really bother me. I think he is likely to be scum (like I said, newbie town doesn't lurk when under review like this), but either way, he's anti-town. Yes, I am a "lynch all lurkers" and yes if he claimed vig or something I'd unvote him.MCD wrote:As you've not weighed in on the rest of the case against SC (other than to dispute it) this would lead me to believe that you believe that SC is a lurking townie, right?
But not because of what others are doing, because of my own rules.MCD wrote:Once quite a few other folks were talking about SC's quick 180, however, you figured you'd hop on that wagon.
I don't understand. On what is essentially a weak wagon, why would I jump on? It would be much easier, as a scumbuddy, to refute this wagon 'till death and use WIFOM to escape. I've done it before...I think.MCD wrote:If anybody looks to be scumbuddies with SC, I'd say you're a pretty good candidate....
LTG wrote: Oman just pulled a thinly veiled OMGUS. This looks fascinating. FOS Oman
I'm a fan of the LAL meta.Schteven wrote:his defense of spacecase followed by joining it based on lurking is very suspect.
Do I have to say it again....I think I will: I only reversed my postion on him when the situation changed. I also think you should change your diagram (innocent newbie -> lurking newbie).MCD wrote:His quick reversal on Spacecase (innocent newbie -> lurking scum) makes him suspect.
Vollnib wrote:Elaborate on this please, Oman. Why does it look like scumbuddies?
In case he gets lynched he can't be accused of defending.MCD wrote:While there's a good chance that Spacecase is scum,
Puts forward a strange situation, give the lurker time to defend. He's lurking, which means he's had lots of time to defend, he's choosing not to. So the first sentence is "Oh ya, he's likely scum" the second is "Just give him more time" which is whats getting him lynched in the first place.MCD wrote: giving him a chance to defend himself is probably more prudent than just lynching him for lurking.
Did you even read my damn posts? I was not attacking him for being new, I defended him for being new, as I didn't feel the reversal was a scumtell, then he did what I thought was a scumtell specific to newbies.Schteven wrote:But that means you're attacking someone for being new, and the chances of them being scum are simply random (1/4 in this case, from initial setup).
I'm a magic double voter.MCD wrote:you've got Oman voting Spacecase and Shteven
I now have two votes.Rules wrote:[12] The mod is always right. Accept the decisions
Actually. Its an If...Then... for me. Basically: IF one of you scum, I think the other likely is. IF he is not, then you might not be.MCD wrote:So what I'm seeing here is that you think that 'SC is scum AND MadCrawdad (who has apparently contradicted himself) is also scum. Since SC AND MadCrawdad are scum, they must be scumbuddies...'
This is the one I mean. You are not scum independently, and my "case" of you is terrible as is. If SC is not scum, we'll I have very little.MCD wrote:Now, here's your original FoS. You specifically say 'alignment based FoS'. This says something a little different to me than your response to Vollkan. This says 'SC is scum, and MadCrawdad is aligned with SC. Therefore MadCrawdad must be scum also.'
It is true.LTG wrote:On a snap judgement, Oman has a weaker argument than MC.
From my latest research, there is no benefit for a town lurking, but that doesn't stop them from doing it.vollkan wrote:Pointless, wishy washy and contradictory are all valid scumtells in most cirumcstances...but lurking? It is easy to lurk and it can help scum, but lurking is not itselffarside22 wrote:Pointless comments, wishy washy and contraditory or also how I evaluate scum. Lurkers go on there because it's easy not to say much and vote out town as scum then trying to be involved in the conversation.MadCrawdad wrote:farside22 wrote:@MCD: I know I'm not around as much, but I did state the following that still hasn't been answered or commented on. <snip>@ farside
Here's a quote where you mention that most of the time, lurkers are scum. As we've got several of them in this game, do you stand by your comment that most lurkers are scum?
farside22 wrote:It was also his lack of reasoning when he voted. Lurkers can sometimes be scum (most times). Depends on the person and if they know how to bluff well in these games.Shteven wrote:P.S. Didn't like the case on melody man day 2, still don't. Seems to basically be "he's lurking". Probably right on that, doesn't sell me as him being scum though.scummy. Anti-town, sure, but not scummy.
Just for me, can you explain what you mean by "act like that"? Do you mean lurking?The Fonz wrote:I'm mildly curious as to why no-one's answered my question about what they think SC's motive to act like that as scum could have been.
Excuse my incredulity, but how is that not lurking? Following the thread, but not posting, lest your ideas be flawed? Doesn't even a 'half-baked' idea give other players some insight into your thought process?[/qute]The Fonz wrote:Oman wrote:I've been tossing up the cases. I don't want to post some half-baked idea.
Meh. I assumed you guys were smart enough to realise that I don't really unvote people I think are scum.Rigel wrote:the slowing wagon makes him think that Spacecase is town and so he might unvote. But he never comes out and says this.