Newbie 1781 - Game over

[Huntress]

Vote Count 1.7

HighKingDestro (2) - Aatami, Fykus
EccentricLemon (2) - rb, Tarkus
Tarkus (2) - Creature, Sagittarius
Creature (1) - HighKingDestro

Not voting (2) - Loopdan, EccentricLemon,


With nine players alive, it takes five votes to lynch.

Deadline for Day One is Wednesday, 22nd March 4.30 pm GMT, (in (expired on 2017-03-22 16:30:00)).

[Sagittarius]

See ya Accountant.

Idk about rb. Didn't understand why he got on my ass for something I didn't do. I'm gonna confess I kind of glazed over his posts because I found his typing mannerisms nice to read so it's probably a good idea to review him. I'm too lazy now though, maybe later.

You think I'm barking up the wrong tree Fykus?

[Tarkus]

Just a little offshoot of this thought - I find it curious that rb was kind of against the BP claim at the beginning and then never confirmed or denied if they are BP or not (considering the fact that our IC would have to be experienced in mafia and would thus know the advantages of this strategy).

As for the moment though, im 90% certain that HKD is scum and I find it unfortunate that the wagon on him fell apart before he could reappear and react to the pressure on him (surely he'd be due for a prod right about now?). As for his partner I'm going to have to do a few ISO reads to try and come to that conclusion.

That is curious. Not sure if rb was actually against it but he definitely didn't offer any support. Need to hear from him on this, but I like where his vote is at and I've been leaning town on him so far.

And I don't think the destro wagon really fell apart. Lost some votes, but I'm still scumreading him and accountant was as well. He should still be feeling the pressure.

[Tarkus]

Btw lemon claimed not BP as well

[Aatami]

What are everyone's thoughts on the tarkus vs Sagittarius debate? Sagittarius how has Farkus' other posts chaged your read of him if at all and how do you feel about him Tarkus? Personally, I'm pretty sure its tvt, and I really want to hear others weigh in.

[Loopdan]

I skimmed this game before asking to replace in. Gut was that the team was Accountant/rb. Was pleasantly surprised by my role pm (not scum).

Nobody should do anything other than vote rb or destro until they both claim BP or not BP.

VOTE: rb

[Creature]

Do you townread Fykus?

[Loopdan]

town-lean

[Loopdan]

Dammit. I just said nobody should do anything until rb and destro claim BP or not BP and then I did something.

[Creature]

Oh right.

[Fykus]

Dammit. I just said nobody should do anything until rb and destro claim BP or not BP and then I did something.

I like the way you think.

VOTE: rb

[Fykus]

Just a little offshoot of this thought - I find it curious that rb was kind of against the BP claim at the beginning and then never confirmed or denied if they are BP or not (considering the fact that our IC would have to be experienced in mafia and would thus know the advantages of this strategy).

As for the moment though, im 90% certain that HKD is scum and I find it unfortunate that the wagon on him fell apart before he could reappear and react to the pressure on him (surely he'd be due for a prod right about now?). As for his partner I'm going to have to do a few ISO reads to try and come to that conclusion.

That is curious. Not sure if rb was actually against it but he definitely didn't offer any support. Need to hear from him on this, but I like where his vote is at and I've been leaning town on him so far.

And I don't think the destro wagon really fell apart. Lost some votes, but I'm still scumreading him and accountant was as well. He should still be feeling the pressure.

i have no idea why we're bp claiming

He acted all coy with it and then never acknowledged anybody mentioning it again.

[Loopdan]

I don't know how you people got more than half-way through day1 using the BP claim strategy without forcing every player to claim. Several players in this game should know better (Accountant included).

[Fykus]

I don't know how you people got more than half-way through day1 using the BP claim strategy without forcing every player to claim. Several players in this game should know better (Accountant included).

I'll take the blame for that one. I was the one who brought it up in the first place and then I never kept track of who had claimed/who hadn't until yesterday when someone else posted it.

[Sagittarius]

Still smells like fish jerky, Aatami. Not sure about Accountant though.

Idk what's the big deal about rb ignoring the BP thing. I'm more concerned about his stance on Destro/Lemon. The entire situation is like melted cheddar flung in glue. Totally piss coloured. Especially that thing with Destro. Didn't even say anything before he switched his stance there. So I'll bite.

VOTE: rb

[Sagittarius]

^ fykus

[Tarkus]

Yayy we're doing this!

VOTE: Destro

And I think sagittarius is prob town.

[Sagittarius]

Wait hey Aatami explain your town read on Tarkus because I like you and I need to know if I'm staring from inside the ground or out of it

[Loopdan]

I have ZERO qualms about lynching either rb or destro if they continue to avoid making a BP or not BP claim.

[Huntress]

HighKingDestro has been prodded.

[EccentricLemon]

I don't necessarily agree that it's right to go after rb for not supporting the BP claim thing. He's the IC, and the IC my last game tried their best to remain neutral and not get in the way of people trying different strategies. So he might not approve but not want to interfere. Idk if it's a universal IC thing or if it's just the one I happened to have. In any case, I want him to comment on it because there isn't much about it in his ISO. Personally, if I were to scumread him, it would be because of his complete certainty of players' alignments. Even being a seasoned player and the ISO doesn't excuse that kind of certainty in my book.

I keep getting confused between Tarkus and Fykus haha, they sound so similar.

What are everyone's thoughts on the tarkus vs Sagittarius debate?

I agree that it's most likely town v. town. Neither of them strike me as scum, really. I think Tarkus' questions are very valid and constructive and Sagittarius' analysis is pretty thought out.

I'd like a claim from you three on your next posts please or I'll start voting as if a non claim is an admission of being scum.

Not really a fan of this take-charge attitude or the missed statement in my post. Even if Fykus just skimmed my post, my not BP claim was the last thing in the post, so it wasn't hard to miss. I agree it was a bit long and dreary, but especially if he's so concerned with the whole BP claim thing he should at least be skimming posts for that. What I'm trying to say is I don't like how this means or at least makes it seem that Fykus didn't read that post, which he should have expected was going to answer to a lot of statements made toward me at a time when my play was under scrutiny.

[EccentricLemon]

Dammit, in that last sentence in the first paragraph, that should be IC and not ISO.

[Loopdan]

VOTE: 270 is the scummiest post I have read in a long long time. I'm not moving my vote off of rb until he claims, but that was terrible.

[Loopdan]

270

VOTE: rb

[Creature]

Isn't 270 made by EccentricLemons?