2017 NFL Football

horrordude0215 · Post Post #58 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:10 am

I want to poke the Raiders with a stick and get them to do

something

... one OL player in 4 days?

Hopefully Patterson comes around.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #63 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:07 am

If Lacy can stay healthy, Seahawks got a damn good deal.

Also hell yes Raiders nab Patterson. Maybe a return game will exist this year.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #66 (isolation #2) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:46 am

Raiders finally have an offense to compete with (I actually don't hate the Murray/Washington/Richard committee if we can get Murray to stay), they just need some LB and Corner help *desperately*.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #81 (isolation #3) » Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:55 am

Nooooo Latavius Murray </3

horrordude0215 · Post Post #83 (isolation #4) » Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:12 am

I'm okay with Cook - we needed to replace Rivera anyways.

Let's make AP a Raider and I'll be happy. Dude would be great behind our line even with his age.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #85 (isolation #5) » Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:32 am

I don't

not

believe in Walford - he made some good plays (primarily in the Red Zone) last year, but Rivera was the clear #1 and I don't see him stepping up that much.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #92 (isolation #6) » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:23 am

I've been trying to ignore the Lynch to Oakland rumors that have been popping up. We'd have to pay a pretty penny to Seattle for the rights, but I would not be opposed to that one at all.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #98 (isolation #7) » Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:14 pm

Seattle owes Lynch $9 Million this year. Releasing/trading him would remove that cap hit.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #100 (isolation #8) » Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:41 pm

In post 99, PJ. wrote:Even if he's retired?

Yep - he has guaranteed money on the contract that he gets paid whether he plays or not.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #107 (isolation #9) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:22 am

The Raiders have officially been cleared to move to Las Vegas. Will spend the next 2 years in Oakland while a stadium is being built and move in 2019.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #113 (isolation #10) » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:42 am

The only thing I'm concerned about with the Raiders in Vegas is the potential loss of the home field advantage that they have. Vegas being a huge tourist destination makes it a lot more appealing for opposing fans than travelling to the East Bay.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #133 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:31 am

Oh please Stevie Wonder could see that Brady and the Patriots were guilty. False equivalency.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #147 (isolation #12) » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:56 am

Plus he's gonna be making some cash as a broadcaster.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #149 (isolation #13) » Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:02 pm

In post 148, shaft.ed wrote:And we got rid of Phil Simms
great news

Best news to come out of this entire offseason.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #150 (isolation #14) » Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:02 pm

Can Joe Buck be gone next?

horrordude0215 · Post Post #155 (isolation #15) » Wed Apr 05, 2017 5:24 am

Romo had great stats, but he was never able to win when it counted, which is going to keep him out. His constant late December/postseason flubs will really hurt his chances with the voters.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #158 (isolation #16) » Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:02 am

Lynch visited the Raiders today, I'm seeing several sources say that he wants it to happen. It's up to Del Rio at this point.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #164 (isolation #17) » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:35 am

Tony Romo was the MVP for every game the Cowboys had to play in December with playoff implications. It's a shame he was the MVP for the other team though.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #167 (isolation #18) » Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:43 pm

Now I'm trying to figure out who they are

I have some ideas, but I think based on the stats alone I'd rather take B. He may not have the rings or accolades, but his stats are better overall.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #171 (isolation #19) » Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:29 am

With the 3rd option added I'd take C.

I don't know if those comparisons are really fair though - Romo had the fortune of playing in the most pass heavy eras in NFL history. His stats are going to be inflated for those reasons alone.