Open 61 - Mountainous Multiball (Game Over!) before 551

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:52 am

Vote: Greasy Spot

, because Greasy and Scummy are similar...

too

similar.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #40 (isolation #1) » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:57 pm

Killah Nine wrote:wut waz da point uv dat yo?

fos: timmytuttut

I'm not quite sure why that merits a FoS, even if you ignore the fact that he messed up the quote tags.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #46 (isolation #2) » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:01 am

Killah Nine wrote:
DoctorJimmy wrote:
Killah Nine wrote:wut waz da point uv dat yo?

fos: timmytuttut
I'm not quite sure why that merits a FoS, even if you ignore the fact that he messed up the quote tags.
becuz how do we no he just messed up da quote tags yo? wen he did dat he cud hav done it fo a numbah uv reasons lyk fo example maybe he wanted to try n post sumthin he thawt sounded reasonable 2 seem activ or sumthin lyk dat. he still hasnt rly even sed wat he wuz tryin to say... dude just quoted sumbody n neva made his point as to y he quoted farside22... da brotha just sed sorry

now y u defendin him yo?

His post is there, it's just inside the quotes. So, yes, we do know that he just messed up the tags, and we do know what he was trying to say.

Where did I defend him? I just wondered why you found him suspicious, since you FoS'd him but didn't really say why. I wasn't making any excuses for him.

Also, it's

really

hard to take you seriously when you talk like that.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #55 (isolation #3) » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:02 pm

Adel, Phate hasn't posted at all so far. Could you send him a prod?

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #91 (isolation #4) » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:07 pm

Rosso Carne wrote:1. I applied pressure and he kinda pegged, not much, but enough.
2. OOO people yell at me for not inciting discussion, but fucking hell, look i incited discussion.
3. OOO AHH LETS ALL JUMP ON THE ROSSO BANDWAGON!!!!

I agree with this. My vote stands for the time being.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #143 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:11 am

Greasy Spot wrote:
armlx wrote:
Vote Greasy Spot

Onward in the name of progress!
That's very scummy like armix. Jumping on the bandwagon. By progress I guess you mean lynching all the Townies.

Greasy Spot wrote:Looking pretty much like scum to me.

Vote: Rosso Carne

What's the big difference between what he did here and what you did?

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #168 (isolation #6) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:33 pm

oEJo wrote:Could you give us a list of suspects and why? Even a top few and bottom few would help. Anything to help us look back on information tomorrow.

I'd like this as well.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #175 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:58 am

Role claims are pretty much meaningless in a mountainous game...

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #200 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:56 pm

I'm okay with experience being taken into account if I get the feeling that the poster in question is a total noob who doesn't have much of an idea what they're doing... I don't get that vibe from Greasy.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #232 (isolation #9) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:48 am

@armlx: I'm curious, do you think timmytuttut88 should get the same leniency for his join date as GS? If not, why?

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #285 (isolation #10) » Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:37 pm

Eek, sorry for going AWOL like that. I'll try not to let it happen again.

At this point, I still like the GS lynch the best for all the reasons previously stated, though support for that seems to be dwindling.

I wasn't all that suspicious of armlx back during the unvoting-greasy-because-he's-new thing - I didn't agree with it, but I didn't find it necessarily scummy either. The vote for oEJo changed my feelings, though. Phate makes a very good point in post 266.

I see the oEJo case as being quite a bit weaker than the other two. The point on his hypocrisy with regards to armlx's backtracking is somewhat valid, but I don't really see it as enough for a lynch.

I'm leaving my vote on GS for the time being, but I'm willing to switch to armlx if the deadline is imminent and that's the consensus.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #316 (isolation #11) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:14 pm

armlx being scum lends weight to both the GS-scum and EJ-scum cases, I'd say. I disagree with OGML about the likliness of a GS/armlx scumpair. Looking back, I really don't see that much antagonism between the two of them, apart from the silly argue-about-the-setup exchange.

Vote: Greasy Spot
FoS: oEJo

One of them is probably armlx's partner.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #318 (isolation #12) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:35 pm

There really wasn't much to comment on. You said "look at this post, I suspect he might be armlx's scumpartner" without really elaborating, in which I didn't see any actual argument to comment on or defend myself against. You also pointed out that I didn't contribute much day 1, which sadly I can't disagree with.

Jumping on each other's bandwagons is antagonism, but I see it as potential bussing antagonism and not "too real to be scumpartners" antagonism.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #334 (isolation #13) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:10 am

Greasy Spot wrote:I fos'd for voting me. Other people in the game have done it plenty without getting blasted.

Glancing back through the thread, I see some examples of people fos'ing someone who voted for them, but in each instance they gave reasoning why they found the vote on them scummy.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #353 (isolation #14) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:43 pm

Haha, wow.

Good game, all.