???In post 1198, podoboq wrote:Setup spec isn't outguessing the moderatorIn post 1193, podoboq wrote:So you haven't taken the time to consider the mechanics by which you have obviously received false information.
4
???In post 1198, podoboq wrote:Setup spec isn't outguessing the moderatorIn post 1193, podoboq wrote:So you haven't taken the time to consider the mechanics by which you have obviously received false information.
Yeah. This ones subconscious slip already told us all what he is really thinking.In post 1201, podoboq wrote:
In post 1206, Gorkington wrote:i dont really think theres any point in trying to argue your case here jaqen.
theres no way im going to treat anything but you accepting the cuck as a scumclaim.
if youre town this game is already over.
In post 1125, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man is ok with falling on his sword but would rather find scum. However, this train of thought is left uninspiring all this means is scum are picking up on this.In post 1115, podoboq wrote:Alright, so Jaqen almost conf scum, there's almost definitely at least one scum in Snarky and Kuroi, and then we probably have one more scum to find.
NO pairing until town has discussed. If people are pairing without significant discussion, it's scummy. If Jaqen or Snarky/Kuroi attempt to pair with anybody, deny them. We can't kill both slots without sacrificing another, so we might have to let one through today, but town should discuss and decide which if either.
I'm gonna go do a little reread on how people treated our options yesterday. I happen to remember Fresh calling me scummy for considering NOT killing DGB/MoI, and I'd like to point out that in hindsight, it's possible that scum talked us out of pursuing one of our better options.
In post 430, Jaqen Hghar wrote:
A {man} is hoping Lady Rach may unleash her freak on him before reading this.And then...In post 615, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Rach- I man is of the mind that he has you pretty much figured out. I don't suppose you could CONFIRM a man's thoughts for him when the time is just so?
In post 611, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Who cares? As a man reads this, his head shakes at unnecessary excuses.In post 581, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And now I have solid internet access again …
In the case of lynching scum, I imagine that they might be able to forego using the book as a way to gain access to the nightkill. We should consider the following three options:In post 1210, Gorkington wrote:lets start linking up so we can get this over with.
In that case, pairs are not likely to matter much if at all. Any reason not to just pair with whoever we're comfortable being linked to? Should we leash the Rach/Fire and Kuroi/Snark slots and have them pair with eachother?In post 1213, Gorkington wrote:not a has to.tptg wrote:The lynched player willget tohand out the Book of Love to one of the Lover groups.
Statistically, this is a really good idea.In post 1214, podoboq wrote:In that case, pairs are not likely to matter much if at all. Any reason not to just pair with whoever we're comfortable being linked to? Should we leash the Rach/Fire and Kuroi/Snark slots and have them pair with eachother?In post 1213, Gorkington wrote:not a has to.tptg wrote:The lynched player willget tohand out the Book of Love to one of the Lover groups.
On the off chance that scumJaqen decides to use the book instead of the bullet, I'd rather him not be able to force anyone into one of the required kills we have to make.In post 1216, Gorkington wrote:i dont really see what that would accomplish
I can't tell if this is sarcastic or not.In post 1215, shos wrote:Statistically, this is a really good idea.In post 1214, podoboq wrote:In that case, pairs are not likely to matter much if at all. Any reason not to just pair with whoever we're comfortable being linked to? Should we leash the Rach/Fire and Kuroi/Snark slots and have them pair with eachother?In post 1213, Gorkington wrote:not a has to.tptg wrote:The lynched player willget tohand out the Book of Love to one of the Lover groups.
Correct.In post 1221, Gorkington wrote:multikill as in trying to cuck multiple people?