In post 5, Firebringer wrote:Nominate Accountant forSelf-Evident
Since i think that is better title for him.
I like it better than Self-Explanatory.
Do you want reasoning restated for this nom, Psyche, considering the new thread?
In post 5, Firebringer wrote:Nominate Accountant forSelf-Evident
Since i think that is better title for him.
In post 14, Firebringer wrote:Also can we nom this thread name changed to the old thread suggested title ofOutback Steakhouse?
Me too, I like it!
XDIn post 28, Alisae wrote:Nth both
I guess we're going to compromise here.
That'll balance things out a bit.
You're not trying hard enough thenPsyche wrote:it's page 2 and i haven't ruined anything yet
isn't this amazing
Application declined.In post 44, keyenpeydee wrote:Let me join this thread.
Don't think so. You should probably PM him about itIn post 92, Psyche wrote:Does he know about this thread?
Don't mind SKIn post 126, Psyche wrote:I can't be expected to know all this all the time; that's why I asked for an explanation...In post 121, SleepyKrew wrote:also he's a lawyer just like Tom HagenIn post 58, Psyche wrote:so the title is no more or less than "he's #2"?
ugh psyche stop being so shit at this
I think that if a user wants to keep their Title they should absolutely be allowed to! Why would we take a gift back!?
You've been here less than a year!?!?In post 149, mhsmith0 wrote:Also I've been on site less than a year and people think I've been here forever. That's... good?
Oh yeah! I saw that last nightIn post 154, Pine wrote:Speaking of, it's cake dayIn post 150, Aristophanes wrote:You've been here less than a year!?!?In post 149, mhsmith0 wrote:Also I've been on site less than a year and people think I've been here forever. That's... good?
I thought you were an '11 like Pine!
(Honestly, I had no clue! It is, in fact, a compliment!)
And they don't stop coming!
My favourite part was when he avoided saying hi to you by explaining how he didn't have time to say hi to you and why! XDIn post 219, KuroiXHF wrote:And yet you still won't say hi to me.In post 218, Psyche wrote:I'm putting videos in spoilers.
more like
Nah, Riley CakeIn post 345, Ankamius wrote:I thought this discussion was about RedCoyote for most of it and got really confused.
Where is this score from and how can you assume victory pre-verdict?Panzerjager wrote:Just add another tally to the scoreboard. Panzer 3- Aristophanes 0.
Hahaha fine, I'll give you those I guess. I'm sure there are more to come!In post 421, PJ. wrote:First time you were wrong and I was right: when FA got banned for abuse 2 days after I said no title and you were all gung-ho about it.
Second: your almost-but-not-really anti-nom on my title that Psyche already said he liked.
Third, fuck it and 4th: both recent RC noms
4-0. Get dunked.
Hahaha classic!In post 431, Kublai Khan wrote:Anti-nth
As in, Antinoms don't cancel out Nths because they aren't direct opposition to them. AntiNths would directly void Nth though.In post 433, Psyche wrote:????
You disgust me with your abuse of
Oh Zito.In post 524, Papa Zito wrote:I'm telling you Psyche.
Create a new security group.
Add the people who have titles to it.
Give that group posting permissions to this forum.
problem solved
I read fake sincerity in every post of yours regarding this and thus am left to assume I am to think you did itIn post 521, Psyche wrote:you mean"poot"
of course i have no idea what the title was before if the title ever wasn't "jack of all trades" before and am just guessing
HURT: ZitoIn post 533, PJ. wrote:Let's all kill zito.
I think you're next in line, aren't you?In post 535, Cheetory6 wrote:Who will we all look up to if zito is gone though?
Like if you cry every time!In post 539, Cheetory6 wrote:hahahahahahahahhahhahhhhhhh
Zito is like real person-tier.
I'm like real person tears.
He never got it :'(In post 544, PJ. wrote:Wait...McMenno got "Aren't We All" taken away?
Positive as shit!In post 546, PJ. wrote:Are you sure?
Chevre wrote:In post 1224, Firebringer wrote:Nominate Mcmenno for "aren't we all"
I am now prepared for my title fairy ban.Rejected.
Chevre wrote:I feel like I've seen "and they don't stop coming" make sense in more instances than "aren't we all" on this site.
McMenno trolled Psyche last Sunday and as a result I will not consider "aren't we all" for another 65 years. So discussion on this title at the moment is not a worthwhile venture.
Chevre wrote: I haven’t approved McMenno for Aren’t We All because so many find it an annoying, needless utterance.
In post 550, Accountant wrote:I'm just pointing out that as an objective fact Chevre said that he(Chevre) would not consider that title for another 65 years, making no mention of psyche
Tell me that again with a straight face.Chevre wrote:McMennolast Sundaytrolled PsycheI will not consider "aren't we all" for another 65 years. So discussion on this title at the moment is not a worthwhile venture.and as a result
You are quite the poet!In post 557, Psyche wrote:to think that a man so young, so ignorant of life's absurdities, could so thoroughly grasp and exploit my deepest insecurities and weaknesses through text-based communication — it is awe-inspiring, even frightening
still today i poop through a straw
In post 564, Not_Mafia wrote:Aren't we all?
LolIn post 563, Chevre wrote:to be fair I personally secretly vowed to myself that if McMenno had still kept up the schtick for a year after rejecting it, I'd probably give it to him
Also I don't remember why I was so mad at McMenno but I was REALLY mad
In post 579, Errantparabola wrote:is there any grounds for quality titling in the very basic traits of spiffeh liking disney and also being a princess?
edit: princess comes from princess spiffeh, which originated in the thing and was a character in the scummies. shrug
In post 583, zakk wrote:It would be at this point which I would probably recommend giving the "aren't we all" title to McMenno just to keep it out of future title discussion... because it's pretty clear it's not gonna die...
This is a repeat of "except when he does", plain and simple. Only difference is, unlike for pie, you don't have McMenno's girlfriend campaigning harder than Hillary on Nov 3.
It should just happen at this point, imo. It's a cute meme that hasn't died which is solely attributed to one person.
When you think McMenno, you think "aren't we all", and when you think "aren't we all", you think McMenno.
It's just... time.
Press da button, Psyche. Do the thingie.
Aren't we all?In post 601, Not_Mafia wrote:I was being ironic or something.
Doesn't sound like it's banned...
This nomination seems irrational...
Hi Psyche!In post 678, Psyche wrote:A lot of people in this thread seem ready to nth literally any nomination that comes up.
In post 682, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:There should be a council of title fairies. Like around 3-5.
People can nominate titles and discuss for/against, but no nths and stuff. Then the mysterious council of title fairies meets on a day to discuss a nominated title, and then they hold a secret vote, with majority yes/no passing or failing the nomination.
This is only half a troll idea too!
Great minds think alike they say!In post 20, Aristophanes wrote:Make a council of title holders to decide if a title is good after the general public has decided?
Like, 5 Nth in the Fairy thread, then some sort of consensus from a higher council in the 48 hours, then you give the approval?
This would remove some starry eyed results and placate the calls for "only titled members deciding who gets titles" crowd.
Psyche wrote:ok gimme five dollars here and ill give anyone you want the title you want for ten days
In post 925, Psyche wrote:i think everything is up to date now
Missed these!In post 847, Creature wrote:Have me as "Existing"
<3In post 933, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:WAITADSFA;SD FAS;DF
NOM ARI FORNTH
NEW RULER, LET'S PUSH THIS ONE THROUGH. HE DESERVES IT