I'm not taking either side in the matter. I'm just pointing out that as an objective fact Chevre said that he(Chevre) would not consider that title for another 65 years, making no mention of psyche, and that as a further objective fact psyche has not said anything in his position as title fairy about the title "Aren't We All" for McMenno(though you could likely predict his response based on past comments on that title)
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 550, Accountant wrote:I'm just pointing out that as an objective fact Chevre said that he(Chevre) would not consider that title for another 65 years, making no mention of psyche
Chevre wrote:McMenno
trolled Psyche
last Sunday
and as a result
I will not consider "aren't we all" for another 65 years. So discussion on this title at the moment is not a worthwhile venture.
Tell me that again with a straight face.
If you want to be objective, at least read the posts first!
unless you mean that Chev didn't discount the possibility of Phyche approving it as Fairy, which is technically true, but a little nitpicky, no?
I mean, I don't see it as likely, but the Fairy should operate somewhat without bias, so it should be at least considered, no?
I'm just pointing out objective facts. And I did say that you could predict psyche's likely response by looking at his previous comments.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 551, Aristophanes wrote:unless you mean that Chev didn't discount the possibility of Phyche approving it as Fairy, which is technically true, but a little nitpicky, no?
I do mean this. Is it nitpicky? Well, that's a subjective question.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
to think that a man so young, so ignorant of life's absurdities, could so thoroughly grasp and exploit my deepest insecurities and weaknesses through text-based communication — it is awe-inspiring, even frightening
In post 557, Psyche wrote:to think that a man so young, so ignorant of life's absurdities, could so thoroughly grasp and exploit my deepest insecurities and weaknesses through text-based communication — it is awe-inspiring, even frightening
anyway i'm really skeptical of catchphrase-based titles
i mean, they aren't really clever or subtle, almost by definition
and on the other hand this one especially doesn't capture much about mcmenno, unless you're trying to say his name on this site is basically synonymous with shitposting
that reasoning combined with my respect for chevre's legacy means it'll take a lot more than the usual to get me to approve the title
to be fair I personally secretly vowed to myself that if McMenno had still kept up the schtick for a year after rejecting it, I'd probably give it to him
Also I don't remember why I was so mad at McMenno but I was REALLY mad
There will be no kisses tonight
There will be no holding hands tonight
'Cause what is now wasn't there before and should not be
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 563, Chevre wrote:to be fair I personally secretly vowed to myself that if McMenno had still kept up the schtick for a year after rejecting it, I'd probably give it to him
Also I don't remember why I was so mad at McMenno but I was REALLY mad