Mini 1895: Shaziro Mafia - GAME OVER

Eddie Cane · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:53 am

I think lamist is a rly rly bad tell

Superhans · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:07 am

Rly.
I think LAMIST can be pretty good with players who are noob. (Not excluding myself).

TwoFace · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:42 am

In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?

I sure as hell hope he does.

WhemeStar · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:34 am

In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?

Why not?

CooLDoG · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:26 am

In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?

my point is that if this is the bar that the town sets for a lynch, then they should go ahead an lynch me for it. Meaning, if people are going to push for this type of lynch I think the rest of the town will get a pretty clear picture of the fabricated scum case on me. However, I agree, I'm probably not going to get lynched on this. It really is quite the flimsy case of: "he misred page 3 joke, got out of rvs on it, thus lynch him". And this is quite degenerate.

ALso, obviously imp is making a mountain out of a mole-hill, but I'm not sure that it is scummy. I'm still happy with my drk vote.

Eddie Cane · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:32 am

In post 254, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?
my point is that if this is the bar that the town sets for a lynch, then they should go ahead an lynch me for it. Meaning, if people are going to push for this type of lynch I think the rest of the town will get a pretty clear picture of the fabricated scum case on me. However, I agree, I'm probably not going to get lynched on this. It really is quite the flimsy case of: "he misred page 3 joke, got out of rvs on it, thus lynch him". And this is quite degenerate.

ALso, obviously imp is making a mountain out of a mole-hill, but I'm not sure that it is scummy. I'm still happy with my drk vote.

This is misrepping and omgus. you call it a fabricated scum case, yet you're voting DRK instead of myself or even TwoFace? you also still have not directly replied to my post that I directly asked you to reply to. oh, and the fact you're trying to take credit for getting out of rvs is hilarious.

CooLDoG · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:44 am

And make me respond to your bullshit. If that is enough to lynch me on it then do it. also, the claim is not that I got us out of rvs, but that I got myself out of rvs with that vote/argument... don't be silly. I'm pretty sure I have responded enough for you to arbitrate upon if this case is a valid reason to lynch me or not, I'm not going to continue to talk about some scum tell you found on page 3 till the end of the day.

I could vote for you, but it depends on how long you are going to tunnel vision me. Right now I have you down as misguided town/null who thinks they struck gold when they haven't. Not worthy of my vote atm. Two face is more of a sheep, I want to see what happens when this wagon inevitably breaks down. If he follows and doesn't give much content to the next pop wagon he hops onto, then I would probably consider voting for him.

Eddie Cane · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:52 am

In post 254, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?
my point is that if this is the bar that the town sets for a lynch, then they should go ahead an lynch me for it. Meaning, if people are going to push for this type of lynch
I think the rest of the town will get a pretty clear picture of
the fabricated scum case
on me.
However, I agree, I'm probably not going to get lynched on this. It really is quite the flimsy case of: "he misred page 3 joke, got out of rvs on it, thus lynch him". And this is quite degenerate.

ALso, obviously imp is making a mountain out of a mole-hill, but I'm not sure that it is scummy. I'm still happy with my drk vote.

In post 256, CooLDoG wrote:And make me respond to your bullshit. If that is enough to lynch me on it then do it. also, the claim is not that I got us out of rvs, but that I got myself out of rvs with that vote/argument... don't be silly. I'm pretty sure I have responded enough for you to arbitrate upon if this case is a valid reason to lynch me or not, I'm not going to continue to talk about some scum tell you found on page 3 till the end of the day.

I could vote for you, but it depends on how long you are going to tunnel vision me.
Right now I have you down as misguided town/null who thinks they struck gold when they haven't.
Not worthy of my vote atm. Two face is more of a sheep, I want to see what happens when this wagon inevitably breaks down. If he follows and doesn't give much content to the next pop wagon he hops onto, then I would probably consider voting for him.

CooLDoG · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:00 am

Yes, I was probably a bit hasty in the first post, and I admit the contradiction. I think that people who vote to lynch me off of this case probably deserve some scum points. However, I can see how making this case could come from scum or town. SO yeah, you got me, I'll admit it. Still not going to vote you (depends on how far you take this tunnel), still need more info to decide on two face, still happy with my drk vote.

Superhans · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:01 am

In post 253, WhemeStar wrote:Why not?

why?

WhemeStar · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:54 am

In post 259, Superhans wrote:
In post 253, WhemeStar wrote:Why not?
why?

Stahpppp

WhemeStar · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:54 am

In post 260, WhemeStar wrote:
In post 259, Superhans wrote:
In post 253, WhemeStar wrote:Why not?
why?
Stahpppp

Read his ISO or something

Superhans · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:22 am

In post 261, WhemeStar wrote:
In post 260, WhemeStar wrote:
In post 259, Superhans wrote:
In post 253, WhemeStar wrote:Why not?
why?
Stahpppp
Read his ISO or something

good point. you can fit Desullys ISO on the back of a teaspoon.

Superhans · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:23 am

can someone explain the wagon on CoolDog in plain english? like a TLDR, because i havent.

Superhans · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:25 am

In post 252, TwoFace wrote:
In post 245, Superhans wrote:
In post 238, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 223, TwoFace wrote:
In post 222, Eddie Cane wrote:you started attacking him "softing masons", which again, was an obvious joke. I returned with another joke. There's no town or scum motivation to claiming lovers page 3, there is however scum motivation in attacking it as I've explained.
Agree
cool, whatever, lynch me.
This is bad play. Not.AI, just bad play.
CoolDog u r not gonna get lynched anytime soon.

The game has been rely dead recently, and apathy is the mother of Defeat.

@whemeatar why Desully?
I sure as hell hope he does.

TwoFace, how confident would you say you are that CoolDog is going to flip scum?

TwoFace · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:50 am

I feel pretty good. His actions/reactions/ and even posts don't really make much sense as town.

horrordude0215 · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:04 am

In post 263, Superhans wrote:can someone explain the wagon on CoolDog in plain english? like a TLDR, because i havent.

Eddie "claimed" lovers on page 3, CD jumped on him pretty hard for it. People are saying that CoolDog is now scum for that, because the reaction was more likely to come from scum than town? idk... I don't buy it tbh.

In post 226, WhemeStar wrote:Whassup folks.

In post 227, WhemeStar wrote:VOTE: Desully

My vote goes here

In post 228, WhemeStar wrote:Really didn't like Darklyns first couple posts... cmon man you put me in a rough spot

I really don't like this intro to the game.

VOTE: WhemeStar

havingfitz · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:21 am

In post 262, Superhans wrote:good point. you can fit Desullys ISO on the back of a teaspoon

That's NAI.

Superhans · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:25 am

In post 267, havingfitz wrote:
In post 262, Superhans wrote:good point. you can fit Desullys ISO on the back of a teaspoon
That's NAI.

yes but a vote on a player is apathetic is a good vote imho.

Superhans · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:26 am

Fitz you're voting CoolDog... why didn't you answer my question on it?

Shaziro · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:31 pm

Prodded DeathRowKitty and Desully

CooLDoG · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:49 pm

horror's vote is good, let's wait for the vote-prodded response.

implosion · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:52 pm

Superhans wrote:Implosions last posts all scream LAMIST.

This is a questionable-at-best use of that term. 231 is strictly a clarification, 233 is part of a conversation and 235 is me answering an explicit question. None of them are me talking about myself. I can sort of see what you're referring to with 231 if you're accusing me of just trying to look transparent? which is still inaccurate.

Superhans wrote:Rly.
I think LAMIST can be pretty good with players who are noob. (Not excluding myself).

Yep, just me, the noob who's been on this site for >6 years
(you are really stretching my ability to not be condescending)

Cooldog wrote:ALso, obviously imp is making a mountain out of a mole-hill, but I'm not sure that it is scummy.

What are you referring to? I feel like I've spent most of the past x pages trying (and failing) to explain why the case on you is bad, which is more like making a mole-hill out of a mountain.

implosion · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:56 pm

I really feel like I have nothing to do with my vote right now that makes me very happy. Let's try this I guess.

Unvote

VOTE: havingfitz

You've entirel been pretty opaque about what you're thinking - why the cooldog vote? Have you gotten anything out of any of the questions you've asked?

CooLDoG · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:01 pm

^meant that at eddie, my bad. Mind has been off today... too much reading.