VOTE: drealmerz7
[insert reason here]
This is SuperJack's first game on MS.
Before I answer that, please answer me this: how serious is this question?In post 29, drealmerz7 wrote:but is that because you're townreading my tone and then compensating for fear of being wrong based on In Memory?
Very Tempting...In post 30, Tea and Biscuits wrote:Why the vote switch, Chara?
Also assume all unsigned posts are SuperJack's.
-- Postie
Okay thanks you're just scum then.In post 36, drealmerz7 wrote:and, yes, I'm looking for an answer, did you arrive at your SR on me based on compensating for misreading my tone in a different game?
Well, Seems like I managed to break reality because I did Compare.In post 44, Almost Chara wrote:why would i immediately give a reason when seeing what you come up with is more fun?
sharp scummers would figure it had something to do with drealmerz. ;>
~Chara
pedit: can you walk through your thought process there, Postie?
peditx2: we is a personal pronoun, he is a third-person pronoun! the two aren't comparable!
Wait no that's not quite what I meant. It's more the trollishness I guess idk something just feels a bit fake and wrong in the same way it did there.In post 50, Tea and Biscuits wrote:scum-aggression
In post 29, drealmerz7 wrote:but is that because you're townreading my tone and then compensating for fear of being wrong based on In Memory?In post 26, Tea and Biscuits wrote:I'm not gonna lie dreal I'm legit scumreading you already here
-- Postie
This kind of shitty discredit does not come from town.In post 51, drealmerz7 wrote:why is 29 terrible? I wanted to know if you were town-reading me by tone (as you did in In Memory) and then switching your read based on your inaccuracy at doing that in that game- seems pretty reasonable to me?
This post feels appeasey as fuck.In post 67, drealmerz7 wrote:I wasn't trying to dismiss it, that was a guess, I asked you a question with it, you could have simply said "no that'd be stupid" and then given your thoughts, instead we're here, and you're still not explaining the read (believe me, I understand not being able to describe why I have a SR, it's nothing damning), that's all I'm trying to do, is understand
it was perhaps my mistake suggesting an explanation for you instead of just letting you explain, but, that was where my mind went, and so I shared it
Yeah, like I said, it wasn't anything solid; just something that made me want to vote him in early-game. It's his reactions to my scumread of him that are making me want to lynch him now.In post 71, The Wood Cutters wrote:The comparison to the linked game so far seems a horrible one, both in game type and differences in posting. I personally don't plan on signing. I'll post more betterer when I'm home.
In post 67, drealmerz7 wrote:believe me, I understand
The phrasing just... ugh. Doesn't feel like a natural response in this situation sorry.In post 67, drealmerz7 wrote:that's all I'm trying to do, is understand
Post 29 and everything after it.In post 77, drealmerz7 wrote:so when exactly did the read become solid?
???
I know Postie isn't scum.In post 104, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you think postie is scum? If so, vote?In post 56, drealmerz7 wrote:I don't think we have bicycles yet, so
*hands postie a paddle* - you can go ahead and backpaddle
Oh a list.In post 128, The Wood Cutters wrote:Pine
Prism
ThinkMomo
PenguinPower
Börk Börk
Drealmerz7
Infinity 324
Almost Chara
Empking
Wraith
Tea and Biscuits
Nancy
As much fun as it is to vote Pine.
VOTE: nancy.
Realistically, this is where we should be.
Yeh that. They did suck. If someone gave shit reads and voted got for it, why does that make them scummy?In post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:135 is vague and I'm trying to clarify it. You don't have to be so cranky.
I don't see why OMGUSing you and saying your reads suck is scummy.
=)In post 176, Empking wrote:How is that relevant to his position in the list?In post 174, Infinity 324 wrote:Empking, because maybe he thought dreal was prominent enough for everyone to have a read on (even though that's not true)
The person whom is asking the wrong person is more to blame.In post 179, Infinity 324 wrote:I should probably stop answering for people, I'm too impatient lol
Nope. Not gonna happen, If someone wants to know why I posted something they can ask me.In post 182, Infinity 324 wrote:What does prism's post have to do with anything?
Superjack, if you think something should've been addressed to you, answer it!
Because placing someone we read as scum, in the middle of any list, is deemed worthy of an investigation.In post 185, Infinity 324 wrote:Superjack, why did you ask why dreal was in the middle of the list?
They used "It;s"?In post 190, The Wood Cutters wrote:You wanna take a guess why I seriously hate this post, this part in particular?In post 186, Almost Chara wrote:P.S. I feel it;s going to be impossible to fake anything and get it past The Wood Cutters. Between them 3 they have seen almost everything I'm capable of, so I'm going to come clean: We're just a mere VT
Just not good enough.In post 191, The Wood Cutters wrote:MEUAHAHAHAIn post 189, Tea and Biscuits wrote:No one is Un-readable.
You'll understand that and what it means one day.
I was typing up responses to the Woodcutters/nancy thing but Prism said everything I wanted to say here.In post 167, Prism wrote:Why is OMGUS scummy? I've found it a decently reliable towntell dependent on a few factors (name kind of player)
The question mark nonsense is a pretty bad mischaracterization and I don't like that you're selling it. She made it explicit that she doubted the certainty of the reads, which has to do with interpreting syntactical choices. The significance of the punctuation is in what it signals. I'd get it if there were confusion overwhereit would make a difference, but it is crystal clear on my end and I suspect to anyone who read the posts in question.
This comment seems to be the basis for the wagon that's forming on Almost Chara. I think someone criticised it for assuming The Wood Cutters are town but I think that's dumb because it's possible to assume someone is town for the sake of a hypothetical scenario without assuming they're town in the game. What I don't understand is why they'd comment on how hard it would be to fake things with town!WC in the game, since that seems like a scum!Almost versus town!WC scenario, which town!Almost shouldn't need to worry about? But I'm also having a hard time buying that scum!Almost would just write up what they're worried about as scum and post it in the game thread. So I'd really just like some clarification from Almost Chara about wtf they were trying to say.In post 186, Almost Chara wrote:P.S. I feel it;s going to be impossible to fake anything and get it past The Wood Cutters. Between them 3 they have seen almost everything I'm capable of, so I'm going to come clean: We're just a mere VT
Didn't you say you thought Infinity's Miller claim was fake? Why isn't he in your lynchpool?In post 285, Wraith wrote:Spoiler: Stream-Of-Consciousness Wall
Right now I could go for Bork, Nancy, AC, or T&B about in that order.
Since this already has some footing:
VOTE: nancy
In post 265, Wraith wrote:rofl are you serious?In post 253, Infinity 324 wrote:King Edward V*
One of the Princes in the Tower? A Miller?
not accompanied by a vote on Infinity?In post 269, Wraith wrote:I just don't buy it.
Your argument being that if he's criticising Infinity for something he knows is true then it can't be scummy? Fuck no. It's how he's going about things that's the problem. He's heavily criticising Infinity for something that implies he thinks Infinity is scum while avoiding committing to a push or even a fuckingThe Wood Cutters wrote:You say Wraith is scummy for his push on Infinity.
Then you say it's distancing meaning they're scumbuds.
So that means you think Infinity is scum lying meaning you would also agree with Wraith saying Infinity is lying.
No? Scum!Wraith can call out scum!Infinity for faking a miller claim. Again, it's not the accusation itself that's the problem but rather how Wraith is going about it, which is why I just said it's scummy even in a world where Infinity is town.In post 322, The Wood Cutters wrote:In order for you to think Wraith's push to be scummy, you have to believe in the miller claim.
^ This is why I'm scumreading Wraith. It follows from this that Wraith is likely doing one of the following:In post 319, Tea and Biscuits wrote:He's heavily criticising Infinity for something that implies he thinks Infinity is scum while avoiding committing to a push or even a fuckingreadon him
That's my main argument for Wraith being scum and it's a good a reason as any to vote him.In post 317, Tea and Biscuits wrote:VOTE: Wraith
It feels like you're trying to find something to nitpick for the sake of it, allowing you to criticise Infinity without having to commit to a real push on him. It's scummy. 130 in particular is terrible; I don't know how to explain it but just read it dear god.
From the same post you list off your scumreads:In post 337, Wraith wrote:* T&B's scumread of me strangely omits my most recent posts where I'm more comfortable with Infinity
That was your second to last post before leaving the thread for a while before you returned just now. The last post you made before leaving was 298, which makes no mention of Infinity.In post 285, Wraith wrote:* Again I'm super-skeptical of Infinity's Miller claim. It was totally unprompted, but that means nothing when it comes to Miller claims - it could just as easily be scum trying to preemptively justify an investigation result as it could be town preemptively attempting to dispel uncertainty. But his flavor claim (Edward V) makesabsolutelyno sense IMO. Richard III would makemuchmore sense for a Miller. Miller also seems like a very unusual pick for a Mini, unless it's only part of the role.
10/10 defence after I just pointed out thatIn post 340, Wraith wrote:Oh now we get the mention from my more recent posts
was you making shit up.In post 337, Wraith wrote:* T&B's scumread of me strangely omits my most recent posts where I'm more comfortable with Infinity
For the record this was really bad too, but you have to read it in context. There had been plenty of activity, andIn post 76, Wraith wrote:I feel like I've seen this episode a hundred times
In post 361, Prism wrote:Wraith's reaction to the miller claim was really good, even if I disagree with it: