Mini Normal 1903 Firestone Mafia [GAME OVER]

Fro99er · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:17 pm

In post 8, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 7, Boonskiies wrote:What color fire do you usually like? I generally tend to think fire is orange generally.

VOTE: Firebringer

~THE MOD WILL NOT TOLERATE VOTES ON THE MOD!~
That makes zero sense.

VOTE: Boonskiies

I'm gonna deport you lickety

VOTE: Lickety

Fro99er · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:19 pm

I guess on mobile it didn't? On here it does.

Fro99er · Post Post #15 (isolation #2) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:19 pm

EITHER WAY IT'S THE DONALD TRUMP GIF SAYING WRONG

DEPORT LICKETY

Fro99er · Post Post #17 (isolation #3) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:25 pm

THEN VOTE ME

LYNCH ALL LIARS, RIGHT?

Fro99er · Post Post #19 (isolation #4) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:27 pm

MY POSTS ALWAYS HAVE MEANING

EXCEPT WHEN THEY DONT

I TRIPLE DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU TO TRY TO DEPORT ME, RUSSELL WESTBROOK STYLE. YOU CANT

Fro99er · Post Post #22 (isolation #5) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:43 pm

YO BOLD THAT SHIT WAFFLES

Fro99er · Post Post #24 (isolation #6) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:46 pm

In post 23, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is your experience playing forum Mafia?

DEPORTING YOU

Fro99er · Post Post #25 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:46 pm

Fro99er · Post Post #29 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:51 pm

In post 26, Firebringer wrote:Jokes on you, I don't even care about page tops

I WILL CLAIM ALL PAGE BOTTOMS TOO

Fro99er · Post Post #31 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:53 pm

Ok serious face

Lickety what are you trying to get from this line of questioning?

Fro99er · Post Post #33 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:55 pm

Fro99er · Post Post #38 (isolation #11) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:58 pm

Ok LQ he answered

Fro99er · Post Post #40 (isolation #12) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:00 pm

So what did you get from his response?

Fro99er · Post Post #41 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:00 pm

And why forum mafia specifically instead of just mafia in general?

Fro99er · Post Post #44 (isolation #14) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:10 pm

Lickety is town

UNVOTE:

Fro99er · Post Post #47 (isolation #15) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:12 pm

No. I'll save it for later. You're town.

I don't want to deport you anymore.

Fro99er · Post Post #48 (isolation #16) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:16 pm

question is...is screen, IAWS, or Waffles the scum on your wagon?

Maybe it was all town. Maybe.

Kinda think it's IAWS or Waffles if there is scum on your wagon.

I think screenplay's vote on you was town-ish.

Fro99er · Post Post #50 (isolation #17) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:18 pm

Fro99er · Post Post #53 (isolation #18) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:19 pm

MTGA!!!

DEPORT FIREBRINGER

VOTE: Firebringer

UNVOTE: Firebringer

VOTE: SomethingWaffles

let's do this LQ

Fro99er · Post Post #56 (isolation #19) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:20 pm

In post 52, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why are you doing wagonomics so early?

Because that's how I play.

I develop reads early. I push things.

Deal with it.

Fro99er · Post Post #59 (isolation #20) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:21 pm

In post 55, rb wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
Aka i am scum

Ez

VOTE: LQ

I am going to drop the universal mafia signal

there it is.

Fro99er · Post Post #61 (isolation #21) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:21 pm

In post 58, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 53, Fro99er wrote:MTGA!!!

DEPORT FIREBRINGER

VOTE: Firebringer

UNVOTE: Firebringer

VOTE: SomethingWaffles

let's do this LQ
It will be interesting to see if you stick with this read.

VOTE: somethingwaffles

I'm town, so I probably won't.

Fro99er · Post Post #63 (isolation #22) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:22 pm

In post 60, rb wrote:fro99er let's be doublevoters together

Then vote waffles with me.

Fro99er · Post Post #64 (isolation #23) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:22 pm

In post 62, rb wrote:Nvm fro99er claimed scum

VOTE: fro99er

Im.drunk right now btw

Welp.

You got me.

Fro99er · Post Post #68 (isolation #24) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:23 pm

In post 66, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 55, rb wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
Aka i am scum

Ez

VOTE: LQ
Oh, I get this vote. But your wrong.

Wait...why do you get it when rb does it for that reason, but not Waffles?

UNVOTE:

Fro99er · Post Post #69 (isolation #25) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:23 pm

and it's *you're

Fro99er · Post Post #71 (isolation #26) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:24 pm

TOP FIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fro99er · Post Post #75 (isolation #27) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:26 pm

In post 72, rb wrote:LQ and I have played together offsite

on another site, or face-to-face?

Fro99er · Post Post #77 (isolation #28) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:26 pm

UNINTENTIONAL PAGE TOP

Fro99er · Post Post #79 (isolation #29) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:27 pm

In post 75, Fro99er wrote:
In post 72, rb wrote:LQ and I have played together offsite
on another site, or face-to-face?

rb if you answer this

In post 44, Fro99er wrote:Lickety is town

UNVOTE:

In post 47, Fro99er wrote:No. I'll save it for later. You're town.

I don't want to deport you anymore.

then I'll answer this

Fro99er · Post Post #81 (isolation #30) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:28 pm

In post 80, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 75, Fro99er wrote:
In post 72, rb wrote:LQ and I have played together offsite
on another site, or face-to-face?
Another site.

you aren't rb

Fro99er · Post Post #84 (isolation #31) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:31 pm

you didn't need the new post thingy. I was asking rb

Fro99er · Post Post #87 (isolation #32) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:34 pm

In post 85, LicketyQuickety wrote:Frog, why did you unvote waffles?

Because you said you weren't surprised about rb scum reading you for what I thought was the "team" thing, when you said it made waffles scummy.

But now I know you weren't surprised about rb for something else.

I still want rb's answer to my question, then I'll give my answer to why I originally townread you.

VOTE: Waffles

pedit: my read has nothing to do with one game on you. My read has to do with your play here.

Fro99er · Post Post #88 (isolation #33) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:35 pm

LQ I will point you to a game I just finished about how I develop reads as town...

Fro99er · Post Post #89 (isolation #34) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:36 pm

In post 89, Fro99er wrote:
In post 86, Srceenplay wrote:
In post 83, Fro99er wrote:Good point. So your vote isn't RVS anymore?
page 4, let's see something exciting
That's not an answer. So you are saying it still is RVS?

I can develop some pretty quick reads by page 4 usually.

In post 525, Fro99er wrote:
In post 523, Dunnstral wrote:after 200 posts of not posting
200 posts is plenty of time for me to form a read on someone. I usually form reads 2-3 pages into a game.

from this game: viewtopic.php?f=83&t=71362

Fro99er · Post Post #92 (isolation #35) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:37 pm

In post 85, LicketyQuickety wrote:Frog, why did you unvote waffles? It was something I was looking for and it happened pretty damn quick.

Why were you specifically looking for this? What about my alignment does me unvoting or not tell you?

Fro99er · Post Post #94 (isolation #36) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:38 pm

In post 91, Firebringer wrote:
Fro99er has been modkilled for bringing in a game that wasn't mine.
He can't be cheating on me and getting away with it.

YOU CANNOT DEPORT ME NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Fro99er · Post Post #95 (isolation #37) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:39 pm

In post 93, LicketyQuickety wrote:Not sure why you are so quick to self meta???

Let me show you something about me self-meta-ing...

Fro99er · Post Post #97 (isolation #38) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:40 pm

In post 262, Fro99er wrote:@bork examples

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p7299362 (BBT called me out for self-meta/WIFOM...BBT was scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p7185807 (Aero calls me out for self-meta...Aero was scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7233708 (Sakura calls me out for self-meta...Sakura was scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p7387205 (Prozac calls out self-meta...Prozac was scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p7405616 (Titus calls me out for self-meta...Titus was scum)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p7338212 (Fire calls me out for self-meta...Fire was scum)
this was ME as scum calling someone else on the WIFOM/Self-meta (http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p6995964) ... see...I even did my own scumtell in my very first scum game.

as scum I self meta/WIFOM too, but i'm not called on it
here: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p7262038 (not called out on it)
here: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p7135564 (not called out for it)

only other scumgame I remember rolling was as a hydra and I don't think I did it there.

I self-meta basically every game. As town or as scum.

Why are you using it to throw shade on me?

Fro99er · Post Post #98 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:42 pm

In post 96, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 92, Fro99er wrote:
In post 85, LicketyQuickety wrote:Frog, why did you unvote waffles? It was something I was looking for and it happened pretty damn quick.
Why were you specifically looking for this? What about my alignment does me unvoting or not tell you?
Nothing if Waffles flips Town...

So you're hinting waffles and I are scumbuddies or if he's town then I'm either town or scum?

Okay. Right.

I still somehow think you're town despite doing my scumtell.

Fro99er · Post Post #101 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:44 pm

In post 99, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not using it to throw shade at you. I asked you a question with a triple question mark.

Then what was the point in asking me that?

Fro99er · Post Post #104 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:45 pm

In post 103, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 101, Fro99er wrote:
In post 99, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not using it to throw shade at you. I asked you a question with a triple question mark.
Then what was the point in asking me that?
To get an answer, naturally.

And what does my answer tell you

Fro99er · Post Post #106 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 105, LicketyQuickety wrote:Look, Frog,

Yeah, I found it sus that you were self-meta-ing for what looked like zero reason. I don't see how I am Scummy for asking you that. Self-meta can be a Scum tell for some people. I don't get why you think that is suspicious. Its a pretty natural thing to ask about, I think.

Because scum almost always ask about it to point out it's suspicious.

Town try to figure out WHY I'm using it.

It's not a 100% tell, but it's north of 80%, and that's pretty good.

But I think you might be in the 20ish percent right now.

Fro99er · Post Post #107 (isolation #43) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm

In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!

Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?

Fro99er · Post Post #110 (isolation #44) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:02 pm

Whatever. I'm fine if you haven't sorted me. I don't expect you to be able to yet.

Fro99er · Post Post #113 (isolation #45) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:09 pm

In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta

Who said anything about his meta?

you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything,

Except it's helping me get a read on him. People don't understand how I work.

my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)

Wasn't an actual suspicion, yet you gave a reason (the "team" thing).

Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading him?

Fro99er · Post Post #116 (isolation #46) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:12 pm

See...LQ is conftown to me.

NEVER DEPORT LQ.

Fro99er · Post Post #119 (isolation #47) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:14 pm

In post 118, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 116, Fro99er wrote:See...LQ is conftown to me.

NEVER DEPORT LQ.
I should not be confirmed anything to you at this point.

Yes, you should be.

You literally don't understand how I work.

Fro99er · Post Post #120 (isolation #48) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:14 pm

Your paranoia on me is cute tho

Fro99er · Post Post #121 (isolation #49) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:18 pm

In post 3, Firebringer wrote:
Firestone (Flavor)
This is such a pretty firestone, it would be a shame if something were to happen to it.

Eats firestone

Fro99er · Post Post #124 (isolation #50) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:20 pm

happy birthday rb

Fro99er · Post Post #127 (isolation #51) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:22 pm

now answer my Q .. did you play with LQ on a different site, or in person?

Fro99er · Post Post #131 (isolation #52) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:25 pm

thx...that re-conftowns LQ for me

Basically, LQ said he didn't have any offline experience. I went and looked up his newbie game that I was in with him to see if that was the case, because I remembered Cho asking him about his mafia experience in that game (you can see it in the timestamps of my posts where me looking up that game occurred, because there was a delay in my posting).

In that newbie game, he said he played in person before, but it was 10+ years ago (which essentially confirms he doesn't have any offline experience that is useful to here).

Fro99er · Post Post #132 (isolation #53) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:27 pm

In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more.

The best part is, you've been posting a lot. And since you made it a point to point out that your (former but maybe not now) scum game has less posting, then I assume your town game meant more posting in general (which I experienced in your newbie game).

I have re-conf-conftowned you

NEVER DEPORT LQ

Fro99er · Post Post #133 (isolation #54) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:28 pm

rb vote waffles with me and LQ plz

I think he is scum

Fro99er · Post Post #136 (isolation #55) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:05 pm

In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?

Answer please waffles

Fro99er · Post Post #140 (isolation #56) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:20 pm

In post 137, LaLight wrote:hey everyone!

How is the setup talk treated? I mean.. There is a word in setup that we are playing "normal 3:10", what does that mean? Is it a closed setup where the on;u thing we know i an amount of scum/town players and all the roles are unknown?

It means there are 10 town players and 3 players that NEED DEPORTATION (are scum)

Fro99er · Post Post #142 (isolation #57) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:23 pm

In post 141, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 136, Fro99er wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?
Answer please waffles
Answer my two questions.

Sorry dude, I asked you first.

Fro99er · Post Post #145 (isolation #58) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:32 pm

In post 143, LaLight wrote:
In post 140, Fro99er wrote:
In post 137, LaLight wrote:hey everyone!

How is the setup talk treated? I mean.. There is a word in setup that we are playing "normal 3:10", what does that mean? Is it a closed setup where the on;u thing we know i an amount of scum/town players and all the roles are unknown?
It means there are 10 town players and 3 players that NEED DEPORTATION (are scum)
But do we know anything about the setup itself?

we know mafia has daychat and it's 10:3 and it's a normal game

the rest we don't know.

Fro99er · Post Post #146 (isolation #59) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:34 pm

In post 144, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 142, Fro99er wrote:
In post 141, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 136, Fro99er wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?
Answer please waffles
Answer my two questions.
Sorry dude, I asked you first.
Interesting idea.

Hmm...

How about you answer 1 question of mine, then I answer yours, then you answer my other one.

That's not how this works. I asked first. You answer first.

I repeat, why did you change your vote away from LQ and onto WhyMafia when you weren't townreading LQ?

Fro99er · Post Post #150 (isolation #60) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:48 pm

In post 148, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Anyone want to hear an interesting thought?

Well here it is anyways!

not townreading=/=scumreading

:O!! OMG!! It's so crazy!!

Exactly.

So why did you unvote LQ if you aren't townreading him. You don't have to be scumreading him, but you moved off him to vote WhyMafia who hadn't posted.

Why did you change who you were voting, when you were null on both?

Fro99er · Post Post #155 (isolation #61) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:07 pm

In post 138, LaLight wrote:also I got an impression, that all the people who have posted so far are somewhat townie

This included Waffles

In post 151, LaLight wrote:anyway, VOTE: SlingshotWaffles based on gut and ppe

Explain what changed.

Fro99er · Post Post #158 (isolation #62) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:14 pm

In post 156, SlingshotWaffles wrote:What happened to answering my questions?

I forgot.

1 sec

Fro99er · Post Post #159 (isolation #63) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:20 pm

In post 134, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 133, Fro99er wrote:rb vote waffles with me and LQ plz

I think he is scum
Hmmm... Interesting...

Use=ful

And why might that be?

I think you might be scum because your hop off LQ and onto WhyMafia in the face of a bit of pressure from me read like you wanted to avoid LQ. This is exacerbated by the fact that you don't even town read LQ yet, so there's no reason to hop off his wagon for a WhyMafia wagon.

I think you might be scum because the first reason you gave for not townreading him was "I have no idea about his meta" -- when nobody said anything about meta. It was an odd response to my question that had nothing to do with meta.

I think you might be scum because you just dismissed me and LQ as "arguing about not much of anything" instead of taking the time to read into what we were doing. Like you already knew our alignments and think what we talked about was nothing, because nothing was there for you to find since, if you are scum and he and I are town, then you know we are both town, while he and I were doing a dance to try to sort each other.

I think you might be scum because when called out on the "team thing" you backpedalled and said it wasn't really a reason.

Fro99er · Post Post #160 (isolation #64) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:20 pm

what was your second question?

Fro99er · Post Post #162 (isolation #65) » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:24 pm

In post 161, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 160, Fro99er wrote:what was your second question?
Can I only play one game at a time if this is my first?

Also going to bed. May respond in the morning.

No idea. It's been a long time since I was a newbie. Best to ask a list mod (one of the mods with a Green username)

Fro99er · Post Post #181 (isolation #66) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:06 am

In post 178, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 120, Fro99er wrote:Your paranoia on me is cute tho
'maybe give an explanation then

fucking read.

I've given explanations on LQ multiple times.

Fro99er · Post Post #182 (isolation #67) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:08 am

In post 166, become wrote:Wow was that a lot of pointless arguing in the span of a few hours. All participants are either town or too-early-to-tell-they're-scum.

Fro99er - pretty sure we're lynching to kill, not to deport.

I don't get why y'all think mafia mobile is bad when you're clearly doing it on the toilet.

Early VOTE: rb vote for his opinions.

wasn't pointless

we're lynching to DEPORT

why vote rb instead of waffles? what's wrong with rb's opinions?

Fro99er · Post Post #184 (isolation #68) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 6:27 am

I might if you tell me why.

I pointed out that inconsistency with LaLight, but it kinda felt like newbish town, but it still sits in the back of my mind.

Fro99er · Post Post #186 (isolation #69) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 7:23 am

See, yeah, that's exactly what I saw.

But Waffles is being really scummy too. I would bet all of Trumps money that there's scum in one of the two. I'll keep the pressure on waffles for now, but I'm not opposed to a LaLight wagon. I do have a hard time seeing that as a bus, so I'm pretty comfortable ruling them out as a scum pair for the time being.

Thoughts on my waffles case?

Fro99er · Post Post #188 (isolation #70) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:13 am

VOTE: LaLight

Fro99er · Post Post #189 (isolation #71) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:14 am

I can buy that

Fro99er · Post Post #199 (isolation #72) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:40 am

LQ that was the worst post I've ever seen

Fro99er · Post Post #200 (isolation #73) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:41 am

THE WORST

Fro99er · Post Post #201 (isolation #74) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:43 am

In post 193, become wrote:Was an RVS (That's what I meant by early vote) - didn't want to jump on any wagons just yet.

So it was RVS even though you gave a reason for it (not liking his opinions)

And when I press you about what's wrong with his opinions you backtrack to it being RVS?

Were you afraid to jump on any wagons?

VOTE: become

Fro99er · Post Post #203 (isolation #75) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:43 am

Clearly I do

Fro99er · Post Post #205 (isolation #76) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:45 am

what?

Fro99er · Post Post #206 (isolation #77) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:45 am

this game is going to drive me insane.

Can we get rb back here please?

rb and screenplay will be the people I interact with from here on out. Everyone else makes no fucking sense.

Fro99er · Post Post #207 (isolation #78) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:46 am

oh I'll interact with boon and creature too...forgot they were in this game

Fro99er · Post Post #209 (isolation #79) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:51 am

In post 208, become wrote:just because someone has opinions I dislike doesn't make them scum

then why did you vote him?

Fro99er · Post Post #210 (isolation #80) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:52 am

In post 166, become wrote:Early VOTE: rb vote for his opinions.

FOR HIS OPINIONS

Fro99er · Post Post #211 (isolation #81) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:52 am

YOU VOTED HIM FOR HIS OPINIONS NOW YOU ARE SAYING ITS RVS?

I DONT BUY THAT

Fro99er · Post Post #214 (isolation #82) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:53 am

In post 212, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 200, Fro99er wrote:THE WORST
Empty shade.

It's not shade. It's just a dumb post.

Go ahead and vote me, since you seem to want to at multiple points.

I already said I townread you.

Fro99er · Post Post #215 (isolation #83) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:53 am

LQ doesn't understand the different between a bad post and a scum post.

Fro99er · Post Post #216 (isolation #84) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:55 am

In post 208, become wrote:I am afraid to jump on wagons currently - too early for lynching.

Nobody said anything about lynching this early

Fro99er · Post Post #217 (isolation #85) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:55 am

good lord the people in this game...

Fro99er · Post Post #218 (isolation #86) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:56 am

waffles vote become with me

then i'll interact with you

Fro99er · Post Post #221 (isolation #87) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:57 am

In post 219, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 215, Fro99er wrote:LQ doesn't understand the different between a bad post and a scum post.
Not true. As I understand it, its more of a discredit than anything else. This way you can Town read me without having to engage with me. Convenient.

I've already engaged with you. I've already figured out you are town.

Now I'm telling you you're playing like an idiot.

But oh, oh, convenient frogger. Then fucking vote me.

Fro99er · Post Post #224 (isolation #88) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:59 am

how does it not make sense

I'm asking the player named waffles to vote the player named become so that if he does so then i'll interact with him more.

Fro99er · Post Post #226 (isolation #89) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:59 am

In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why should I vote you when I can still make my intentions know that I find you Sus? Don't tell me you never push more than one angle at a time as Town.

Oh I'm "sus"

wheee

sus

sus

LMFAO

Fro99er · Post Post #227 (isolation #90) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:59 am

Fro99er · Post Post #229 (isolation #91) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:01 am

In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:Don't tell me you never push more than one angle at a time as Town.

That's exactly what I'm doing right now

but I'm sus

Fro99er · Post Post #230 (isolation #92) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:01 am

In post 228, IAlwaysWinSometimes wrote:What does AI stand for?

Artificial intelligence.

Fro99er · Post Post #238 (isolation #93) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:12 am

In post 234, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 226, Fro99er wrote:
In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why should I vote you when I can still make my intentions know that I find you Sus? Don't tell me you never push more than one angle at a time as Town.
Oh I'm "sus"

wheee

sus

sus

LMFAO
More discrediting me, charming.

How is that a discredit? I am townreading you.

Fro99er · Post Post #239 (isolation #94) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:13 am

LQ seriously has problems with me, and I don't know why.

Fro99er · Post Post #244 (isolation #95) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:36 am

In post 241, LicketyQuickety wrote:Not true. I don't have any problems with you on a personal level. I just don't get why you fail to ask me about my perspective and instead seem to just throw out what I say as irrelevant.

I already got your perspective.

Fro99er · Post Post #245 (isolation #96) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:36 am

In post 242, LicketyQuickety wrote:I feel like you are playing dumb. Do you seriously not get that town reading someone while discrediting them would be a viable Scum tactic? That is the reason I find you Sus.

I'M NOT DISCREDITING YOU

Fro99er · Post Post #246 (isolation #97) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:37 am

In post 243, LicketyQuickety wrote:As soon as Frog falls under suspicion suddenly all I do doesn't makes sense. At least, that is what I am seeing.

Nobody is suspecting me but you.

I'm not worried one bit. I'm fucking obvtown here.

Fro99er · Post Post #247 (isolation #98) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:38 am

In post 240, become wrote:Could be the incessant trolling?

Could it be you have zero motivation to find scum right now.

You're the obvscum here.

Fro99er · Post Post #249 (isolation #99) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:38 am

I'm ignoring LQ the rest of the game

Waffles, vote Become with me

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:39 am

LOOOOL

good fine screenplay

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:45 am

Creature is town

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:46 am

Do you guys hear something?

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:52 am

In post 131, Fro99er wrote:thx...that re-conftowns LQ for me

Basically, LQ said he didn't have any offline experience. I went and looked up his newbie game that I was in with him to see if that was the case, because I remembered Cho asking him about his mafia experience in that game (you can see it in the timestamps of my posts where me looking up that game occurred, because there was a delay in my posting).

In that newbie game, he said he played in person before, but it was 10+ years ago (which essentially confirms he doesn't have any offline experience that is useful to here).

In post 132, Fro99er wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more.
The best part is, you've been posting a lot. And since you made it a point to point out that your (former but maybe not now) scum game has less posting, then I assume your town game meant more posting in general (which I experienced in your newbie game).

I have re-conf-conftowned you

NEVER DEPORT LQ

have fun LQ. I've sorted you. I'll talk to you later.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:55 am

In post 113, Fro99er wrote:
In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta
Who said anything about his meta?

you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything,
Except it's helping me get a read on him. People don't understand how I work.

my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)
Wasn't an actual suspicion, yet you gave a reason (the "team" thing).

Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading him?

In post 114, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta, you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything, my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)
Why does my meta matter? Do you plan to meta dive me at some point?

We also had THE EXACT SAME THOUGHT about the Waffles talking about your meta stuff at THE EXACT SAME TIME. Can't fake that...especially because I posted mine a fraction before you. Same wavelength.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:04 pm

{Frog}
{LQ, Screenplay, Creature}
{rb}

{LaLight}
{Boon, Creative, Fitz}
{Waffles, WhyMafia}

{IAWS}

{become}

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:10 pm

In post 209, Fro99er wrote:
In post 208, become wrote:just because someone has opinions I dislike doesn't make them scum
then why did you vote him?

In post 210, Fro99er wrote:
In post 166, become wrote:Early VOTE: rb vote for his opinions.

FOR HIS OPINIONS

In post 211, Fro99er wrote:YOU VOTED HIM FOR HIS OPINIONS NOW YOU ARE SAYING ITS RVS?

I DONT BUY THAT

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:11 pm

In post 193, become wrote:Was an RVS (That's what I meant by early vote)

THEN YOU SAID THIS

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:18 pm

In post 274, become wrote:You're dense...

I wanted to make an RVS (aka: early) vote.
The RVS-reason I gave was "for his opinions". Yes, this is related to what he said, but I still count that as RVS since I by no means wanted to lynch him for it, nor seriously suspected him for it.

I wouldn't make a real vote without a more detailed analysis.

I'm dense, but I'm not scum, correct?

Who is scum? There's plenty of info to go by here.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:18 pm

I feel like town!become would have some paranoia about me instead of just calling me dense.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:23 pm

That's the difference between LQ and become

LQ is paranoid and sus of me and thinks I'm discrediting him

become just thinks I'm "dense" for not understanding his made up reason

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:38 pm

In post 281, become wrote:And while I somewhat doubt you'll believe me now, I do suspect you.

And you suspect me why?

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:40 pm

In post 282, become wrote:I suppose my suspicion of you (so far, anyway) is also obligatory, though. You and waflles trolled yourself up a bit so it's hard not to suspect you.
My town tell of LQ is also somewhat obligatory - people seem to trust him and their reasons seem fair.

1. I troll every game

2. What do you trust about people townreading LQ? I think I'm the only one that's given real reasons, but you don't trust me.

Especially #2 doesn't make any sense coming from a town perspective, if you trust people's reasons, but I'm the only one with reasons.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:44 pm

In post 288, become wrote:Because of your trolley antics such as telling LQ to shush, telling waffles to vote me...

I troll every game.

Answer my other question please. Since you said you agree with other reasons for townreading LQ, what are those reasons for townreading LQ do you agree with, and who stated those reasons?

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:44 pm

Oh, so you trust my reasons for townreading LQ, but you don't trust me.

got it.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:44 pm

Guys I've found scum.

Fro99er · Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:46 pm

So you think I'm scum?

Then why is your "RVS" (because of his opinions) vote sitting on rb still?

Fro99er · Post Post #309 (isolation #117) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:10 pm

I hate playing newbiew games in the normal queue

Fro99er · Post Post #313 (isolation #118) » Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:45 pm

In post 310, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 309, Fro99er wrote:I hate playing newbiew games in the normal queue
I'm sorry :/

I'm trying to formulate my own reads, but don't want to seem redundant

You're not the problem

Fro99er · Post Post #365 (isolation #119) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:26 am

This town is so dumb.

This is my obvtown game, y'all. Go look up any meta of me OTHER than my last game with Boon.

Where is Alisae when you need him.

ALI WHY ARE YOU NOT PLAYING THIS GAME WITH ME?!?!?

Fro99er · Post Post #366 (isolation #120) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:28 am

In post 356, LicketyQuickety wrote:Fro99er is a bit too over-the-top for my liking.

Over the top is my town game.

Sit back and reserved is my scum game.

I have a very divisive meta. I tried to break it in my last game with Boon by sitting back as town (to be fair it was a 15 player game, multiball, and I was a town protective PR so I was town-PR hunting just as much as I was scum hunting), which is why he noticed a difference between me there and here.

Fro99er · Post Post #369 (isolation #121) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:30 am

In post 353, LaLight wrote:scum!fro99er wouldn't townread his partners so easily in the beginning of the game

This is factually incorrect.

As scum, I have townread my buddies very early before.

However, in this case I am town and LQ is town.

As town I get into TvTs (before I know the person is town, but the argument helps me determine they are town).

LaLight's case on me is full of incorrect assumptions

Fro99er · Post Post #370 (isolation #122) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:30 am

In post 368, LaLight wrote:Who might know you are not trying it vice versa? Playing over the top as scum? Would be pretty logical to do that

Just shut up. You don't know me.

Fro99er · Post Post #371 (isolation #123) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:31 am

In post 367, Boonskiies wrote:I said I wasn't scum reading you, froggy.

Oh I know. I just said why you noticed a difference.

We cool

Fro99er · Post Post #373 (isolation #124) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:33 am

In post 360, havingfitz wrote:I liked LaLight's post where he voted Fro99er. I didn't agree with everything he said but as I read it it felt like he was being genuine and trying to sort out Fro99er. Also...you mention timezone issues LaLight...what country do you live in?

I agree

the case is bad, but it did look like a real attempt to sort me.

Fro99er · Post Post #375 (isolation #125) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:36 am

In post 353, LaLight wrote:fro99er is overemotionally

Frogger doesn't get over emotional as scum.

I'm fucking telling you all, this is my textbook town game. I will go ape shit on you post game if you lynch me D1.

I wish I still had my Best Town Performance banner, so I could get some god damn respect in here from you noobs.

Fro99er · Post Post #377 (isolation #126) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:40 am

Here

LaLight...let's start with some questions, so you can better understand me.

Why can't you consider that my motivations are town, and instead are scum motivated? Why can't you see I like to sort people through emotion and pressure? I look for every little reason to pounce, because scum have a harder time handling pressure than town, and scum have to fake their emotions more.

Fro99er · Post Post #378 (isolation #127) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:41 am

In post 376, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 375, Fro99er wrote:
In post 353, LaLight wrote:fro99er is overemotionally
Frogger doesn't get over emotional as scum.

I'm fucking telling you all, this is my textbook town game. I will go ape shit on you post game if you lynch me D1.

I wish I still had my Best Town Performance banner, so I could get some god damn respect in here from you noobs.
Seems like you've been doing a lot of personal attacks.

Why is this?

because you noobs scum read me for my towngame, because I'm outgoing, loud, emotional, and flamboyant, and it's ridiculous.

Fro99er · Post Post #381 (isolation #128) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:43 am

In post 379, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 366, Fro99er wrote:
In post 356, LicketyQuickety wrote:Fro99er is a bit too over-the-top for my liking.
Over the top is my town game.

Sit back and reserved is my scum game.

I have a very divisive meta. I tried to break it in my last game with Boon by sitting back as town (to be fair it was a 15 player game, multiball, and I was a town protective PR so I was town-PR hunting just as much as I was scum hunting), which is why he noticed a difference between me there and here.
Placing a a lot on meta.

Didn't you call me out for doing the same?
Sushi-spicious!

No, I called you out for asking about LQ's meta when I was asking a totally different question to you.

this is me explaining my own self-meta. Big difference.

Fro99er · Post Post #382 (isolation #129) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:44 am

And you've already missed that I self-meta EVERY game.

That you are calling me out for my self-meta, despite me saying I already self-meta every game, has me very concerned.

Fro99er · Post Post #384 (isolation #130) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:47 am

{Frog}
{LQ, Screenplay, Creature}
{LaLight}
{Fitz, rb}

{Boon, Creative, WhyMafia} NULL

{IAWS,Waffles}

{become}

Fro99er · Post Post #385 (isolation #131) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:49 am

In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!

In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?

In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta, you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything, my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)

No, you weren't talking about meta when you unvoted him. You only started talking about meta after I asked you if you were townreading him.

Fro99er · Post Post #386 (isolation #132) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:49 am

LQ and I both, at the same instance, were like "why the fuck are you talking about meta in response to my question" there.

Fro99er · Post Post #390 (isolation #133) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:54 am

Got it.

Then the unvote makes no sense. If you didn't have a read on him, why unvote him to vote someone else you don't have a read on yet either?

To me it read like you were afraid I called out people on that wagon, and then moved your vote because I said of the three votes on LQ, yours looked the worst. So you moved it as a reaction to my pressure.

pedit: @waffles

Fro99er · Post Post #393 (isolation #134) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:55 am

In post 391, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 390, Fro99er wrote:Got it.

Then the unvote makes no sense. If you didn't have a read on him, why unvote him to vote someone else you don't have a read on yet either?

To me it read like you were afraid I called out people on that wagon, and then moved your vote because I said of the three votes on LQ, yours looked the worst. So you moved it as a reaction to my pressure.

pedit: @waffles
What pressure lol?

It was still RVS mind you.

The pressure of me calling your vote out on LQ as possible scum, then me voting you right after.

Fro99er · Post Post #395 (isolation #135) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:00 am

In post 21, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
VOTE: Lickety

He says that "his team" will have a better chance. Scum confirmed.

Your vote wasn't RVS, even though you continue to claim it was.

What is with people coming on here, claiming they RVS'd despite giving a reason (become did the same thing -- saying he didn't like someone's opinions then said he wasn't really voting because of opinions)

Fro99er · Post Post #401 (isolation #136) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:17 am

Actually LQ, screen could be scum now that I go through his ISO.

My town read initially was based off his RVS vote, which I thought was hilarious, because it was clearly a sarcastic reason and was the good vote on you.

Now that I look back on it, he kinda looks like he wanted to derail me off Waffles and onto LaLight, who I'm now townreading in posts 169, 183, and townreads waffles for a shitty reason in 187

As for my WhyMafia read...I can't really explain a null read I haven't really interacted with. I've been focused elsewhere.

Fro99er · Post Post #402 (isolation #137) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:19 am

In post 401, Fro99er wrote:My town read initially was based off his RVS vote, which I thought was hilarious, because it was clearly a sarcastic reason and was the good vote on you.

I had also just finished a game with him where he was town, and he didn't do anything noticeably different, but that's why my original townread was subject to change.

I think if Waffles is scum, there's a good chance Screen is scum

inb4 preflip associations are bad. I do them every game. That's how I hunt...I tie people together and make them squirm, choosing a stance on their buddy one way or the other.

Fro99er · Post Post #405 (isolation #138) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:24 am

read again...partner with waffles.

Fro99er · Post Post #407 (isolation #139) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:27 am

I've been wrong before. Like I said, I was initially townreading you, but now I'm not so sure after going back through your ISO.

Do you still think Waffles is town? If so, why?

Fro99er · Post Post #409 (isolation #140) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:31 am

In post 408, Srceenplay wrote:I would say townish. I stand by what I said earlier.
He got to l-2 pretty fast as well. That makes me suspicious of the wagon.

And then it stalled and got derailed (partially by you).

I've seen scum get rung up early before. I don't think getting to L-2 on an early wagon is indicative of any particular alignment. I certainly won't throw someone in the town pile because they were an early L-2. I'd rather town read them for other reasons.

Fro99er · Post Post #411 (isolation #141) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:36 am

That's funny...people were scum reading me for "trolling" (even though I was playing seriously)

I find trolling NAI. Especially jokey-type trolling. I know people who do it as both alignments. they're doing it to have fun.

Fro99er · Post Post #412 (isolation #142) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:37 am

In post 289, become wrote:
In post 287, Fro99er wrote: 1. I troll every game

2. What do you trust about people townreading LQ? I think I'm the only one that's given real reasons, but you don't trust me.

Especially #2 doesn't make any sense coming from a town perspective, if you trust people's reasons, but I'm the only one with reasons.
I need to analyze this game, I'm not going to analyze everyone else's other games, sorry.

I did think the reason you gave for trusting LQ was good. I just didn't like your trolling afterwards.

Scum can give good reasons too, scum are not bizzaro town.

Here's me getting scum-read for "trolling"

Fro99er · Post Post #419 (isolation #143) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:17 am

We'll play nice.

The problem is, you are scum reading me for patently false reasons that don't exist within my meta. You are making assumptions about how I'd play as town or scum, and you're getting them backwards. Yes, I've tried to manipulate my meta here and there, but this isn't one of those times.

Fro99er · Post Post #420 (isolation #144) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:19 am

In post 418, LaLight wrote:You motivations, if they are town-motivated are too weak.

I'm not a weak town player.

I'm actually pretty good as town. Go look up my record (which I know you don't care to).

My motivations are to find scum. That's why I've pressured:

Lickety
You
Become
Waffles
Screen

all at different times. And others to a lesser extent.

If you think I'm tunneling, you haven't been paying attention.

Fro99er · Post Post #422 (isolation #145) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:20 am

In post 418, LaLight wrote:Emotion and pressure are all good. For scum.

LMAO

You can't be serious right now.

Pressuring scum is the exact way to make them crack.

Fro99er · Post Post #424 (isolation #146) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:21 am

LaLight, you aren't even trying right now. You're just going off your flawed assumptions and pigeon holing me as scum based off patently false assumptions. The exact definition of confirmation bias right there.

Fro99er · Post Post #425 (isolation #147) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:22 am

VOTE: Waffles

Fro99er · Post Post #426 (isolation #148) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:23 am

Waffles isn't even scumhunting. Just tunneling me as OMGUS

Fro99er · Post Post #429 (isolation #149) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:25 am

Waffles is so clearly, obviously scum.

Read his ISO.

It's all just asking people to explain things, and making shitty retorts to me, without doing any scum hunting himself.

Fro99er · Post Post #430 (isolation #150) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:25 am

In post 427, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 426, Fro99er wrote:Waffles isn't even scumhunting. Just tunneling me as OMGUS
Please define tunneling.

SEE SHIT LIKE THIS ISNT SCUM HUNTING

Fro99er · Post Post #432 (isolation #151) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:26 am

In post 428, LaLight wrote:
In post 424, Fro99er wrote:LaLight, you aren't even trying right now. You're just going off your flawed assumptions and pigeon holing me as scum based off patently false assumptions. The exact definition of confirmation bias right there.
Okay, I will assume you're town and reread you from that perspective, let's go with this

Thank you. That's all I asked of you when I tried reaching out to you.

If you still come to the conclusion that I don't have town motivations after looking at things through a town lense, then at least I can say you aren't confbiased.

Fro99er · Post Post #435 (isolation #152) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:42 am

Spoiler: Literally every post of Waffles showing his lack of scum hunting

In post 21, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
VOTE: Lickety

He says that "his team" will have a better chance. Scum confirmed.

Waffles' self-admitted RVS vote, not scum hunting

In post 27, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 22, Fro99er wrote:YO BOLD THAT SHIT WAFFLES
Wtf, why did it not bold?

VOTE: Lickety

In post 23, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 21, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
VOTE: Lickety

He says that "his team" will have a better chance. Scum confirmed.
What is your experience playing forum Mafia?
Not much to be frank...

Not scum hunting

In post 35, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 28, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 27, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 22, Fro99er wrote:YO BOLD THAT SHIT WAFFLES
Wtf, why did it not bold?

VOTE: Lickety

In post 23, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 21, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
VOTE: Lickety

He says that "his team" will have a better chance. Scum confirmed.
What is your experience playing forum Mafia?
Not much to be frank...
Specifics please. How many games? I expect you to kinda know that if its under 5.

So have you played more or less than 10?
I have played somewhere between 9-12 games.

I am also currently in 2 games on another site.

Not scum hunting

In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!

In post 108, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Is there any way to receive notifications when someone replies to a thread?

Waffles' self-admitted RVS vote, not scum hunting

In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta, you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything, my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)

Not scum hunting

In post 115, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 111, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 108, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Is there any way to receive notifications when someone replies to a thread?
Phones are terrible for Mafia, just so you know.
Oh yeah, I know (RIP because rarely have access to computer or laptop).

I meant on the website.
Such as you get an alert on your profile when someone responds to a thread that you are watching.

Not scum hunting

In post 123, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:
In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta
Who said anything about his meta?

you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything,
Except it's helping me get a read on him. People don't understand how I work.

my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)
Wasn't an actual suspicion, yet you gave a reason (the "team" thing).

Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading him?
-Regarding the meat: oh boy
-Okay then... You do you as long as it doesn't interfere with me doing me.
-N I C E M E M E Actual reason, pftt! XD! That's funny

In post 114, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta, you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything, my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)
Why does my meta matter? Do you plan to meta dive me at some point?
Because meta can be used as a tool to help, especially in earlier stages of the game...
And how would I know your meta? I literally just said that, lol.

Not scum hunting

In post 134, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 133, Fro99er wrote:rb vote waffles with me and LQ plz

I think he is scum
Hmmm... Interesting...

Use=ful

And why might that be?

Not scum hunting

In post 135, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Also, if this is my first game here, can I only be in one game?

Not scum hunting

In post 141, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 136, Fro99er wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?
Answer please waffles
Answer my two questions.

Not scum hunting

In post 144, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 142, Fro99er wrote:
In post 141, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 136, Fro99er wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?
Answer please waffles
Answer my two questions.
Sorry dude, I asked you first.
Interesting idea.

Hmm...

How about you answer 1 question of mine, then I answer yours, then you answer my other one.

Not scum hunting

In post 147, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 146, Fro99er wrote:
In post 144, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 142, Fro99er wrote:
In post 141, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 136, Fro99er wrote:
In post 113, Fro99er wrote:Why did you switch your vote then if you're not townreading LQ?
Answer please waffles
Answer my two questions.
Sorry dude, I asked you first.
Interesting idea.

Hmm...

How about you answer 1 question of mine, then I answer yours, then you answer my other one.
That's not how this works. I asked first. You answer first.

I repeat, why did you change your vote away from LQ and onto WhyMafia when you weren't townreading LQ?
Interesting proposition.

Too bad I'm going to deny it.

Not scum hunting

In post 148, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Anyone want to hear an interesting thought?

Well here it is anyways!

not townreading=/=scumreading

:O!! OMG!! It's so crazy!!

Not scum hunting

In post 152, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 150, Fro99er wrote:
In post 148, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Anyone want to hear an interesting thought?

Well here it is anyways!

not townreading=/=scumreading

:O!! OMG!! It's so crazy!!
Exactly.

So why did you unvote LQ if you aren't townreading him. You don't have to be scumreading him, but you moved off him to vote WhyMafia who hadn't posted.

Why did you change who you were voting, when you were null on both?
Why did I do this, hmm?

Let's see... No particular reason to continue voting for LQ. All of the reasoning to vote for Why!

Seems legit. 7/10 not enough sarcasm.

Not scum hunting

In post 156, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 155, Fro99er wrote:
In post 138, LaLight wrote:also I got an impression, that all the people who have posted so far are somewhat townie
This included Waffles

In post 151, LaLight wrote:anyway, VOTE: SlingshotWaffles based on gut and ppe
Explain what changed.
What happened to answering my questions?

Not scum hunting

In post 161, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 160, Fro99er wrote:what was your second question?
Can I only play one game at a time if this is my first?

Also going to bed. May respond in the morning.

Not scum hunting

In post 179, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 176, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 112, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 107, Fro99er wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Are you townreading LQ now?

If so why?
Hahahaha.

No.

It's still early, I have no idea about his meta, you and him seem to be arguing about not much of anything, my vote on him wasn't even an actual suspicion, and as a sneak peak into my "I'm playing a game of Mafia" meta: Day1=memes and banter (Why can confirm, IF HE EVER GETS ON!)
Yeah
I know waffles from another site. He's is a terrible d1 player (sorry )
However, his votes so far are sketchy af
Hey, if my D1 actions don't get me killed D1-D2, then my actions can provide very useful information.

A tiny bit of scum hunting, saying his votes are sketchy af. But that's it. No real reason.

In post 180, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 175, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 90, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
UNVOTE: (what do you say here?)

VOTE: WhyMafia

Get off block pixel games and stop tryharding mineman pvp forums, and play the game!!
Shifty .. why in the world did you try to shift attention
Oh also, shift attention from what?

Now you just seem to be parroting the more outspoken (was it fro99er or LQ?)

Throwing parroting shade

In post 190, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 188, Fro99er wrote:VOTE: LaLight
No! Vote me!

I'm the Vengeful Jester!

/s

Not scum hunting

In post 192, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 191, Srceenplay wrote:
In post 190, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 188, Fro99er wrote:VOTE: LaLight
No! Vote me!

I'm the Vengeful Jester!

/s
Why the hidden s?
Why not?
If it's there obviously then it's ruined.
If it's not there then you'll find me scummy.

Not scum hunting

In post 195, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 193, become wrote:
In post 182, Fro99er wrote: we're lynching to DEPORT
We'll have to agree to disagree.

In post 182, Fro99er wrote: why vote rb instead of waffles? what's wrong with rb's opinions?
Was an RVS (That's what I meant by early vote) - didn't want to jump on any wagons just yet.

Waffles is being his namesake now, though.
My namesake, what?
In post 194, become wrote:
In post 179, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Hey, if my D1 actions don't get me killed D1-D2, then my actions can provide very useful information.
What are the chances this will happen? Where are you going with this?
Chances of me dying? Pretty high.
People like to kill me early.

Not scum hunting

In post 198, SlingshotWaffles wrote:So LQ, what you're saying is that you don't want me quickhammered, but you aren't willing to unvote?
10/10 Creative Rating

Not scum hunting

In post 213, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 206, Fro99er wrote:this game is going to drive me insane.

Can we get rb back here please?

rb and screenplay will be the people I interact with from here on out. Everyone else makes no fucking sense.
Not even me?

You hurt my feelings... ;-;

Not scum hunting

In post 298, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 262, become wrote:
In post 195, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Chances of me dying? Pretty high.
People like to kill me early.
People like killing those they don't understand. Here, it's your fault, though.
lol "my fault"
N I C E M E M E

Why might it be my fault though?

Not scum hunting

In post 300, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 299, LicketyQuickety wrote:Frog, stop tunneling.
Let him.

He's just trying to get to China.

Let him die in that communist ridden place.

Not scum hunting

In post 302, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 301, become wrote:(Edit to previous post: that will be my last post about myself till then - I'm still going to talk to/about others)

SlinghsotWaffles - because your posts are rather hard to understand.
E.g. First quote answer of viewtopic.php?p=9107861#p9107861
And what's the trouble with that?

Not scum hunting

In post 305, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 303, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 198, SlingshotWaffles wrote:So LQ, what you're saying is that you don't want me quickhammered, but you aren't willing to unvote?
10/10 Creative Rating
I don't think scum will quickhammer considering it it would be obvious af
Talk to him, not to me.

Not scum hunting

In post 306, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Oh also.
VOTE: Fro99er

Yep.
Good day.

Not scum hunting. NO reason given for the vote despite asking everyone else for reasons.

In post 311, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 309, Fro99er wrote:I hate playing newbiew games in the normal queue
Welp, that sucks for you, moron.

Not scum hunting

In post 314, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 313, Fro99er wrote:
In post 310, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 309, Fro99er wrote:I hate playing newbiew games in the normal queue
I'm sorry :/

I'm trying to formulate my own reads, but don't want to seem redundant
You're not the problem
Ooh me!
Me me me!

Not scum hunting

In post 316, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 315, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 313, Fro99er wrote:
In post 310, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 309, Fro99er wrote:I hate playing newbiew games in the normal queue
I'm sorry :/

I'm trying to formulate my own reads, but don't want to seem redundant
You're not the problem
So you want to point fingers, but you don't actually want to point fingers. I think I understand that.
He's an interesting fellow, and I want him lynched.

Not scum hunting. Still no reason given.

In post 318, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 317, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 312, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 307, LicketyQuickety wrote:Reads List:

Town:

Why Mafia
LaLight

Town Lean:

Waffles
Creature
Fro99er

Null:

rb
Creative
Srceenplay

Lean Scum:

Boonskiies
Fitz
become

Scum:

IAlwaysWinSometimes

VOTE: IAlwaysWinSometimes
Please explain pretty much all your reads xd
K.

I reread the thread. That should answer why I have the reads I do.
Please give specifics for each read.

(Does this site not know about evidence??)

Not scum hunting. Asks for reasons despite never giving reasons on his vote for me.

In post 320, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 319, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 318, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 317, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 312, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 307, LicketyQuickety wrote:Reads List:

Town:

Why Mafia
LaLight

Town Lean:

Waffles
Creature
Fro99er

Null:

rb
Creative
Srceenplay

Lean Scum:

Boonskiies
Fitz
become

Scum:

IAlwaysWinSometimes

VOTE: IAlwaysWinSometimes
Please explain pretty much all your reads xd
K.

I reread the thread. That should answer why I have the reads I do.
Please give specifics for each read.

(Does this site not know about evidence??)
Yup, this site obviously knows nothing about evidence.
Certainly seems like it.

Not scum hunting

In post 327, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Hello.

I'd like to make a proposition.
To uphold the tradition, I say we lynch Mark.

Not scum hunting

In post 330, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 328, Srceenplay wrote:
-mute:SlingshotWaffles
That was rude.

Why?

Not scum hunting

In post 332, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 329, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 151, LaLight wrote:anyway, VOTE: SlingshotWaffles based on gut and ppe

I actually kind of felt the same way as this.
Explain. Please.

Provide evidence!

Not scum hunting. Asking for explanation despite never giving an explanation for his vote on me.

In post 335, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 334, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 333, Srceenplay wrote:Ya I blew that game. Sorry
No worries. We've all done it. Those situations are made through the entire gamestate rather than just one action.
Hello.
Please respond to my question.

Not scum hunting. Still asking for explanations.

In post 338, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 337, havingfitz wrote:
In post 324, Srceenplay wrote:Why Boon and fitz as scum leans?

I'm ok with a fitz vote.
Little activity and putting someone at L-2 and leaving

VOTE: Fitz
Leaving? I haven't left. And if I think I'm voting scum L-2 No big deal imo?
Who were you voting and why?

Not scum hunting. Still asking for explanations.

In post 342, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 341, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 332, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 329, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 151, LaLight wrote:anyway, VOTE: SlingshotWaffles based on gut and ppe

I actually kind of felt the same way as this.
Explain. Please.

Provide evidence!

I actually don't like this. How do I provide evidence on something "based on gut". I didn't push the case because the gut reasoning is pretty useless this early in the game, as with more posts, it'll clear up anyways.
Basing anything on gut shouldn't be good enough for anything, but apparently it is here...

Not scum hunting. Still annoyed with people giving gut reads, but still doesn't explain the vote on me.

In post 344, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 343, Boonskiies wrote:Again, I didn't push you for any of it. I was just stating I felt the same way on the gut. Did I vote? No. Did I question you at all? No.

Overly defensive to the max. Damn.
Just asking for evidence... nothing too big really.

Not scum hunting. Still asking for evidence.

In post 376, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 375, Fro99er wrote:
In post 353, LaLight wrote:fro99er is overemotionally
Frogger doesn't get over emotional as scum.

I'm fucking telling you all, this is my textbook town game. I will go ape shit on you post game if you lynch me D1.

I wish I still had my Best Town Performance banner, so I could get some god damn respect in here from you noobs.
Seems like you've been doing a lot of personal attacks.

Why is this?

Not scum hunting. Just shading me.

In post 379, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 366, Fro99er wrote:
In post 356, LicketyQuickety wrote:Fro99er is a bit too over-the-top for my liking.
Over the top is my town game.

Sit back and reserved is my scum game.

I have a very divisive meta. I tried to break it in my last game with Boon by sitting back as town (to be fair it was a 15 player game, multiball, and I was a town protective PR so I was town-PR hunting just as much as I was scum hunting), which is why he noticed a difference between me there and here.
Placing a a lot on meta.

Didn't you call me out for doing the same?
Sushi-spicious!

Not scum hunting, just shading me again, incorrectly.

In post 383, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 381, Fro99er wrote:
In post 379, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 366, Fro99er wrote:
In post 356, LicketyQuickety wrote:Fro99er is a bit too over-the-top for my liking.
Over the top is my town game.

Sit back and reserved is my scum game.

I have a very divisive meta. I tried to break it in my last game with Boon by sitting back as town (to be fair it was a 15 player game, multiball, and I was a town protective PR so I was town-PR hunting just as much as I was scum hunting), which is why he noticed a difference between me there and here.
Placing a a lot on meta.

Didn't you call me out for doing the same?
Sushi-spicious!

No, I called you out for asking about LQ's meta when I was asking a totally different question to you.

this is me explaining my own self-meta. Big difference.
You called me out because I was talking about meta when you asked me why I unvoted him.
I talked about meta because I said I didn't know his, so I didn't have a lean or read on him.

Also how can we trust you?
I still think that you're putting too much on meta, which is sushi indeed.

Not scum hunting

In post 387, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 386, Fro99er wrote:LQ and I both, at the same instance, were like "why the fuck are you talking about meta in response to my question" there.
Because I had no idea about his meta, so I didn't know how he usually acted D1, which was one of the reasons I didn't have a townread or a scumread on him.

In post 388, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I started talking about meta afterwards, because that is when I was asked why I unvoted.

Not scum hunting

In post 391, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 390, Fro99er wrote:Got it.

Then the unvote makes no sense. If you didn't have a read on him, why unvote him to vote someone else you don't have a read on yet either?

To me it read like you were afraid I called out people on that wagon, and then moved your vote because I said of the three votes on LQ, yours looked the worst. So you moved it as a reaction to my pressure.

pedit: @waffles
What pressure lol?

It was still RVS mind you.

Not scum hunting

In post 394, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 393, Fro99er wrote:
In post 391, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 390, Fro99er wrote:Got it.

Then the unvote makes no sense. If you didn't have a read on him, why unvote him to vote someone else you don't have a read on yet either?

To me it read like you were afraid I called out people on that wagon, and then moved your vote because I said of the three votes on LQ, yours looked the worst. So you moved it as a reaction to my pressure.

pedit: @waffles
What pressure lol?

It was still RVS mind you.
The pressure of me calling your vote out on LQ as possible scum, then me voting you right after.
Ah yes.

The accusation that a RVS vote showed scum, followed by another RVS vote.

Not scum hunting

In post 398, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 395, Fro99er wrote:
In post 21, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 18, LicketyQuickety wrote:Seriously tho, I am going to try and not post so much so my posts mean more. Something like that anyways. I feel like my team has a better chance at winning if I stay alive for longer, so that is what I am going to try and do.
VOTE: Lickety

He says that "his team" will have a better chance. Scum confirmed.
Your vote wasn't RVS, even though you continue to claim it was.

What is with people coming on here, claiming they RVS'd despite giving a reason (become did the same thing -- saying he didn't like someone's opinions then said he wasn't really voting because of opinions)
"Reason"

Yep. He was conf scum because he said his group or whatever.
Do you not understand how completely BS that reason is?

Not scum hunting

In post 414, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 402, Fro99er wrote:
In post 401, Fro99er wrote:My town read initially was based off his RVS vote, which I thought was hilarious, because it was clearly a sarcastic reason and was the good vote on you.
I had also just finished a game with him where he was town, and he didn't do anything noticeably different, but that's why my original townread was subject to change.

I think if Waffles is scum, there's a good chance Screen is scum

inb4 preflip associations are bad. I do them every game. That's how I hunt...I tie people together and make them squirm, choosing a stance on their buddy one way or the other.
Hmm...

What is that thing called where you shouldn't try to group scum before a flip?

Not scum hunting

In post 423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 420, Fro99er wrote:
In post 418, LaLight wrote:You motivations, if they are town-motivated are too weak.
I'm not a weak town player.

I'm actually pretty good as town. Go look up my record (which I know you don't care to).

My motivations are to find scum. That's why I've pressured:

Lickety
You
Become
Waffles
Screen

all at different times. And others to a lesser extent.

If you think I'm tunneling, you haven't been paying attention.
Or you have a different definition of tunneling.

Not scum hunting. Deflecting away from scum hunting, even.

In post 427, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 426, Fro99er wrote:Waffles isn't even scumhunting. Just tunneling me as OMGUS
Please define tunneling.

In post 431, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 426, Fro99er wrote:Waffles isn't even scumhunting. Just tunneling me as OMGUS
And wait, OMGUS? lol

Not scum hunting

Fro99er · Post Post #436 (isolation #153) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:44 am

In post 434, LaLight wrote:I believe you were mostly genuine with your posts. But still I am not sure about your ability to imitate it all.

See, this is a completely fair statement. The paranoia is warranted.

But pigeon-holing my town game as me manipulating my scum meta was just confbias. I appreciate the second look.

Who else would you like to dive into now? Let's bounce reads off each other, because I'm pretty sure you're town.

Fro99er · Post Post #439 (isolation #154) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:50 am

Yeah, I sorted LQ through our back and forth. Let me know if you need me to help you there with him.

Fro99er · Post Post #442 (isolation #155) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:55 am

I too can ask people to explain themselves and call it my own scumhunting

Fro99er · Post Post #443 (isolation #156) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:55 am

In post 441, LaLight wrote:
In post 439, Fro99er wrote:Yeah, I sorted LQ through our back and forth. Let me know if you need me to help you there with him.
One quick question: how to make spoiler button?

[ spoiler= ] [ /spoiler ]

(remove the spaces)

Fro99er · Post Post #444 (isolation #157) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:56 am

In post 442, Fro99er wrote:I too can ask people to explain themselves and call it my own scumhunting

This @waffles

Fro99er · Post Post #446 (isolation #158) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:57 am

What did you analyze? There is next to ZERO analysis in your ISO except the two posts I pointed out that were fairly benign analysis.

What are your reasons for voting me? You never explained that despite asking everyone else for their explanations.

Fro99er · Post Post #450 (isolation #159) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:28 am

In post 448, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 446, Fro99er wrote:What did you analyze? There is next to ZERO analysis in your ISO except the two posts I pointed out that were fairly benign analysis.

What are your reasons for voting me? You never explained that despite asking everyone else for their explanations.
Analysis noted for later.

I voted you because you were putting too much into meta, you were tunneling people, and you were voting and accusing people of scum for RVS votes. You also jumped around in voting.

You voted me for both tunneling AND jumping around?

That makes no sense.

Fro99er · Post Post #451 (isolation #160) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:29 am

And you voted the player who self-admittedly EVERY game puts too much into meta (and has shown proof of it) for putting too much into meta? That's not a real reason.

Fro99er · Post Post #452 (isolation #161) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:30 am

In post 449, LaLight wrote:That said, LQ is LeanTown for me.

Fro99er, you townread him, right?

Correct. I too found some occasional scum posts, especially early in the game, but after mine and LQ's back-and-forth for a bit, I eventually town sorted him.

Fro99er · Post Post #456 (isolation #162) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:42 am

In post 453, LaLight wrote:Any comments on reread? Do you know his meta btw?

I don't really know his meta, no. I've played 1 game with him, and it was a newbie game 2 years ago.

As for the reread, I mostly agree. I thought post 105 was the most obvious town post. It was very lucid, and straight forward with me.

I disagree early reads lists are more likely to be scum. I gave an early reads list too.

Fro99er · Post Post #458 (isolation #163) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:46 am

Go look up my town games. I do it early as town too. I'll happily link for you.

My point is, you can't assume it's more likely coming from scum.

Fro99er · Post Post #460 (isolation #164) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:02 am

In post 459, LaLight wrote:
In post 458, Fro99er wrote:Go look up my town games. I do it early as town too. I'll happily link for you.

My point is, you can't assume it's more likely coming from scum.
Link me one not too long game where you are town. I promise to reread it and finally see what you are talking about and stop casting shadows.

viewtopic.php?p=8837251#p8837251

that happened less than two days into the day phase (there was a special mechanic, so day didn't start until here)

Fro99er · Post Post #461 (isolation #165) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:03 am

@Mod, can you prod Creative please? He has yet to post.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:50 am

In post 462, IAlwaysWinSometimes wrote:What's all this talk about meta? Meta is bullshit. If you're playing like scum, you're scum. If you're playing like town, you're town. The only time meta is acceptable imo is when you know somebody personally or you've played a shit ton of games with them. But frogger, while I think you're town, spewing on about how this is your town game is supposed to convince who?

Then what's the point of this post? To tell me to stop doing something I do every game? That's the definition of pointless.

Talk to me about why you think I'm town, and about who is scum.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:51 am

In post 463, LicketyQuickety wrote:Town gunna win dis 1.

I agree. Shall we lynch IAWS or Waffles? Both are acceptable.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:25 pm

You are tunneling me right now. That means you are scum by your logic.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:31 pm

In post 474, SlingshotWaffles wrote:jumping to the next person with practically no reason at all.

You are describing my town meta. Don't take it from me, take it from Alisae

viewtopic.php?p=8852631#p8852631

That's town Frogger in a nutshell.
Town!Frog is all over the place.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:32 pm

oh my god

I cannot do this. I am thisclose to replacing.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:32 pm

This is the most frustrating player list I've ever played with, outside of a few of you.

Fro99er · Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:33 pm

VOTE: Waffles

Fro99er · Post Post #506 (isolation #173) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:04 pm

In post 502, rb wrote:I cbf catching up

Fro99er who is scum?

Waffles IAWS and become

Fro99er · Post Post #514 (isolation #174) » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:31 pm

I like cheese

Fro99er · Post Post #534 (isolation #175) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:32 am

rb posting elsewhere, both IRL yesterday and today, but being "V/LA" here is concerning.

Fro99er · Post Post #535 (isolation #176) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:32 am

oh wait, he posted here yesterday...NVM

although it was mostly useless

Fro99er · Post Post #540 (isolation #177) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:41 am

In post 537, LicketyQuickety wrote:Like Frog is playing really fucking aggressive and I don't know how I feel about it.

That's my towngame.

But you don't care to go read another town game of mine, so you're going to blow this one here for us because you're stubborn.

Fro99er · Post Post #546 (isolation #178) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:55 am

In post 545, rb wrote:i really hate LQ slot right now but as long as its sheeping fro99er im fine

LQ isn't sheeping me

Fro99er · Post Post #547 (isolation #179) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:55 am

In post 536, LicketyQuickety wrote:I am blaming Frog if this lynch goes through and Waffles is Town and Frog is going to have a lot to answer for.

although there's no doubt this sounds like lining up lynches.

My townread has faded ever so slightly.

Fro99er · Post Post #550 (isolation #180) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:04 am

In post 450, Fro99er wrote:
In post 448, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
In post 446, Fro99er wrote:What did you analyze? There is next to ZERO analysis in your ISO except the two posts I pointed out that were fairly benign analysis.

What are your reasons for voting me? You never explained that despite asking everyone else for their explanations.
Analysis noted for later.

I voted you because you were putting too much into meta, you were tunneling people, and you were voting and accusing people of scum for RVS votes. You also jumped around in voting.
You voted me for both tunneling AND jumping around?

That makes no sense.

This is still my favorite part of waffles scum read on me

I'm both tunneling and jumping around.

Fro99er · Post Post #552 (isolation #181) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:10 am

I'm active!

talk to me about this game. Who do you need reads on, and tell me if you disagree or agree with me when we start talking about them.

Fro99er · Post Post #554 (isolation #182) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:30 am

UNVOTE:

Fro99er · Post Post #558 (isolation #183) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:03 am

In post 555, rb wrote:tell me what u think of:

- boonskiies
- havingfitz
- screenplay
- creature

everyone else i think i can beat at the gaem if they're scum

Funny, this is the subset of players I actually am enjoying this game (including yourself)

Fro99er · Post Post #559 (isolation #184) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:05 am

creature is probtown, his hesitation on LaLight felt natural.

He hasn't been super active is the main concern, but I think he's been pretty low activity over the whole site since game start.

Fitz just reads town to me. I don't see any scum motivation in fitz yet.

Screenplay I go back and forth on...let me pull up my read on him from earlier.

No read on boon yet.

Fro99er · Post Post #561 (isolation #185) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:13 am

In post 560, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 554, Fro99er wrote:UNVOTE:
why did do dis?

Don't want to say yet

Fro99er · Post Post #562 (isolation #186) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:15 am

In post 401, Fro99er wrote:Actually LQ, screen could be scum now that I go through his ISO.

My town read initially was based off his RVS vote, which I thought was hilarious, because it was clearly a sarcastic reason and was the good vote on you.

Now that I look back on it, he kinda looks like he wanted to derail me off Waffles and onto LaLight, who I'm now townreading in posts 169, 183, and townreads waffles for a shitty reason in 187

As for my WhyMafia read...I can't really explain a null read I haven't really interacted with. I've been focused elsewhere.

In post 402, Fro99er wrote:
In post 401, Fro99er wrote:My town read initially was based off his RVS vote, which I thought was hilarious, because it was clearly a sarcastic reason and was the good vote on you.
I had also just finished a game with him where he was town, and he didn't do anything noticeably different, but that's why my original townread was subject to change.

I think if Waffles is scum, there's a good chance Screen is scum

inb4 preflip associations are bad. I do them every game. That's how I hunt...I tie people together and make them squirm, choosing a stance on their buddy one way or the other.

rb -- here's my screen read

Fro99er · Post Post #563 (isolation #187) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:48 am

In post 561, Fro99er wrote:
In post 560, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 554, Fro99er wrote:UNVOTE:
why did do dis?
Don't want to say yet

Meh

I'll just say it...I kinda think rb is scum.

Fro99er · Post Post #564 (isolation #188) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:50 am

I wanted to see how far he goes with this follow the frog thing, but his lack of interest in this game, and in scumhunting is telling.

Also, I didn't like his shade on you

Fro99er · Post Post #577 (isolation #189) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:12 am

In post 565, rb wrote:yer im pocketing u

what u gonna do

drink

Fro99er · Post Post #580 (isolation #190) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:14 am

sleep well

Fro99er · Post Post #587 (isolation #191) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:35 am

Molla and I don't have similar playstyles at all

Fro99er · Post Post #588 (isolation #192) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:36 am

VOTE: Waffles

there's still zero desire to scumhunt.

Just to pretend like he doesn't care that he's being wagoned.

Fro99er · Post Post #597 (isolation #193) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:06 am

So I'm waffling on waffles too, but he's not doing anything pro-town, so at worst we're voting someone who isn't helping the game state.

Fro99er · Post Post #606 (isolation #194) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:43 am

In post 601, Boonskiies wrote:Like it's kind of ridiculous on the lack of strong scum reads that I'm not iffy about at best. This game is weird.

Fro99er · Post Post #607 (isolation #195) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:43 am

VOTE: IAWS

Fro99er · Post Post #610 (isolation #196) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:11 am

p-sure he was continuing to joke there

Fro99er · Post Post #613 (isolation #197) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:17 am

Fro99er · Post Post #623 (isolation #198) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:18 pm

VOTE: IAWS

Fro99er · Post Post #625 (isolation #199) » Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:36 pm

VOTE: IAWS