In post 2748, jjh927 wrote:Let's talk about Heartless.
Heartless is convinced that, regardless of Vecna's alignment, the people who jumped to ThinkBig's defence must be scum.
That is, he thinks that someone of Eddie, Transcend and Dunn is scum, and that it's likely to be Dunn. No problems up to this point, right, Heartless?
Let's case. So, first up, I seem to recall me attempting to defend TB too and I did a pretty shit job of it. Why am I not the vote? How has my interaction been missed? Probably overshadowed by the fact that me and Titus started slugging it out soon after that, but, nonetheless, I was there and have been missed.
Heartless has been able to specifically avoid having an opinion on the Vecna slot post-replacement through this without looking suspicious at all. Conflicted opinions? I'd think hydra dissonance was possible but we've not seen any of that. So no, it's not that. They likely agree on not giving an opinion.
So what does that leave? I have no idea what the first point could mean, but it might mean the posts in context were skimmed over a bit, or maybe I didn't actually defend ThinkBig at all and I'm imagining that I did. The second point is the foundation of my case. Heartless is setting up a case to lynch Dunnstral in day 2 if we lynch Vecna, and I think the case works regardless of whether or not Vecna is town or scum.
Vote: Heartless
Tell me why I'm wrong, scary hydra person.