That was what they were talking about. They said I had no reason for lynching NIV when I did: my gut.farside22 wrote:Your gut was wrong the first time.Blackberry wrote:I is have reason: my gut.Twomz wrote:Wait, asking someone to vote for someone that I think is scum is scummy... but LYING to get the town to lynch someone for no apparent reason isn't?
Is Gorrad soley on his hammer vote?Blackberry wrote:That was what they were talking about. They said I had no reason for lynching NIV when I did: my gut.farside22 wrote:Your gut was wrong the first time.Blackberry wrote:I is have reason: my gut.Twomz wrote:Wait, asking someone to vote for someone that I think is scum is scummy... but LYING to get the town to lynch someone for no apparent reason isn't?
Fair enough, I plan on voting for xtoxm tomorrow anywayarmlx wrote: Twomz: No deal. I actually believe Blackberry for the moment.
. Unless of course, something else comes up (it usually does). 
I've explained my logic of BB-scum quite nicely, as have others in the town. I'm saying it as fact due to my conviction. I could just as easily have said 'because I think he's scum', but this has more emphasis on how strongly I suspect him. Don't put me in the same group as Xtoxm, I KNOW I'm not as scummy as that.armlx wrote:.....Gorrad wrote:For future reference, I'm not voting Blackberry due to any cop results whatsoever, but because he's scum.
Nice logic.....
This alone makes you next on my list of people to lynch behind Xtoxm. I can understand rediculous gambits from people trying to spice up a game they found boring (somewhat), but statements like these and Xtoxm's, where you make these statements like they are logic when they are just devoid of it are DI scummy.
Twomz: No deal. I actually believe Blackberry for the moment.
Hmmm, good question.farside22 wrote:Rewind:
Is BB vote against Gorrad soley based on his hammer vote?
Better?
A: It appeared as though a claimed tracker caught someone targeting the dead player. Normally, this means that the player is scum (GASP!). Of course, there is the possibility of gravediggers (always show up as targeting the dead player) and other targeting roles (which would have said that they targeted, although I should have been more doubtful that early on day one). But I suddenly logged on to Niv being dead because of a couple of players voting without thinking (or letting the town discuss anything).A: He voted with us for NIV, quickly.
B: He brought up Jester--and then when no one went along with it he revoted me... HUH?
C: He attempted to make a deal to get out xtoxm... WITHOUT even caring what my identity was (unless of course he already knew).
My problem is a bunch of people quicked voted for Niv. Twomz was one of the few people who explained why people were voting when I asked about it.A: He voted with us for NIV, quickly.
I don't know how this really effects thing so I have no comment here.B: He brought up Jester--and then when no one went along with it he revoted me... HUH?
I didn't care for the deal he tried to make either. It sounds like he is lining up his lynches and really it should also include what happens during the night as well as anything found out before you state your order of who you want lynched. However you did lie. That is a hard thing to ignore.C: He attempted to make a deal to get out xtoxm... WITHOUT even caring what my identity was (unless of course he already knew).
I will go with B on Xtoxm (most likely townie) I say this because it's hard for me to see someone fight hard for another player like he has. I've gone over and over with BB case. One valid point is that there could be one vanilla townie. It's not an easy thing to claim that in a game were there could be more then one vanilla. I think to myself this is a theme game and is vanilla townie usually in a theme game? Well that is still a big chance to take on BB's claim. So I go back to Gorrad who did a hammer based on his belief that BB was telling the truth. I doubt this. It has been my experience that most people would see what Niv had to say. Once he made it to L-2 and ChaosOmega said he wanted to hear what Niv said most people should have agree with this. Someone going for the quick lynch could have done so to make BB look bad.hasdgfas wrote:If you think Xtoxm is the scummiest person, then why the HECK are you unvoting him? His scumness may not relate at all to BB's scumness. As I believe I have already stated, I think that if BB is town, then Xtoxm is more likely scum defending/following a suspicious townie. If BB is scum, then Xtoxm is either a stupid scum or a townie who has very interesting thought processes.
Also, Hi and welcome Bookie
but your post still answered questions that Bookie had for BB, like I said. Just because he may or may not be vanilla doesn't mean he can't answer questions about power roles.Xtoxm wrote:My post about weather related roles has absolutley nothing to do with BB. Especially since he's claimed vanilla.hasdgfas wrote:I spy Xtoxm answering for BB again. let BB answer these questions himself.
My post answered NONE of Book's Q's.hasdgfas wrote:but your post still answered questions that Bookie had for BB, like I said. Just because he may or may not be vanilla doesn't mean he can't answer questions about power roles.Xtoxm wrote:My post about weather related roles has absolutley nothing to do with BB. Especially since he's claimed vanilla.hasdgfas wrote:I spy Xtoxm answering for BB again. let BB answer these questions himself.
