Mini 1910: Railgun Mafia [Game Over]
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Gerry's post seems NAI to me. Cabd seems like the only one who was making a big deal out of it, but I don't think I scum-read him. I like how he was willing to explain why he suspected Gerry, so I'm willing to put him as a slight Town-lean. I'm not sure how I feel about everyone else yet.
@Accountant, what do you think of Cabd's suspicion on Gerry?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
What do you think of Gamma's read on Edo? (187, 190, 193)In post 239, Torque wrote:Gamma prolly genuinely didn't see accountant and Grey's little side game with #26 but I really dislike the defensive stance he took during the early exchange
@gerryoat, what do you think of Cabd's push on you? Do you have any suspicions?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
In my mind, they would be more reluctant to, but I can see what you mean.In post 250, Fro99er wrote:
why does explaining oneself earn a town-lean?In post 131, DanelerH wrote:I like how he was willing to explain why he suspected Gerry, so I'm willing to put him as a slight Town-lean.
fun fact
scum can explain themselves too- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
The main issue Cabd seems to have with Gerry is 86, specifically the use of the word "honestly". I don't see much else behind the push, so I think he's just tunneled. Whether it's from Town or Scum, I can't say for sure (especially after the point you made), but it feels more like Town to me.In post 252, Fro99er wrote:That doesn't make sense.
Some scum love explaining to "appear townie"
what do you make of cabd's push on Gerry, not just for explaning, but from the actual points made?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
What was the result you came to? Also, what do you think about Frogger? You didn't like his vote on Alisae (which was clearly a joke), but do you scum-read him for it?
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I've played several games on duelacademy.net. I don't consider myself very good, though.In post 333, Torque wrote:@Daneler how experienced are you at mafia?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I like how they called out Gamma for his baseless suspicion (32). I also like the conversation they had with Cabd on Gerry (99). Other than that, not much else has stood out to me. Overall, I would say that I Town-lean Accountant.In post 346, Torque wrote:
Yeah, okay. Talk about accountant?In post 344, DanelerH wrote:
I've played several games on duelacademy.net. I don't consider myself very good, though.In post 333, Torque wrote:@Daneler how experienced are you at mafia?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Working on it. I'm going through the ISOs and compiling a list of where I put everyone.In post 456, Fro99er wrote:
Dan who are your top scumreads?In post 347, DanelerH wrote:
I like how they called out Gamma for his baseless suspicion (32). I also like the conversation they had with Cabd on Gerry (99). Other than that, not much else has stood out to me. Overall, I would say that I Town-lean Accountant.In post 346, Torque wrote:Yeah, okay. Talk about accountant?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I scum-read Gerry. I only have one reason for thinking he might be Town, which is Post 321. I think scum would be content with leaving the game going at the pace it was. The problem with this is Gerry didn't follow his own rules for the "game" he proposed. If he actually cared about it, he would've given a read on Keyenpeydee. Also, aside from this post, Gerry hasn't done much other than ask a couple of questions.In post 456, Fro99er wrote:Dan who are your top scumreads?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
It sort of changes things. I didn't correlate 355 with the game you started, so that's my mistake. It still doesn't make a lot of sense, though. Wouldn't you have started the gameIn post 706, gerryoat wrote:I disagree with your reason for scumreading me. You said the only reason is cause I didn't follow my own game, but I actually did.
In post 328, gerryoat wrote:dont break the game. kee going
So your whole basis of SR me is flawed, does that change your read or is there other reasons that you did not explain that you scumread me for?In post 355, gerryoat wrote:I think mudkip could be town because i like his iso, looks like there could be genuine scumhunting there.
in 321? You started it in 321, then posted about it again 10 minutes later (328). Another 3 hours and 41 minutes passed until until 355, where you finally played your game. Why did you wait so long to do so?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
In 321, Gerry starts the game to get activity going. At the beginning of it, though, he chose not to play. If he cared about it, he would've given a read on Keyenpeydee. It makes me read that post as an attempt to look like he was doing something, while also not doing anything.In post 733, Torque wrote:Why the hell is him not playing his own game AI zzz
What do you think of Wisdom v Titus?
As for Wisdom vs Titus, Titus doesn't sound too good. I don't particularly like 630. She sounds angry in it, which is the easiest emotion to fake. "It's your entire ISO" sounds a bit forced, as it's not giving a proper example (granted, Wisdom used a similar line in 724). 631 and 632 sound like random names Titus is throwing around, considering she hadn't previously said anything about either Torque or Accountant being scummy.- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Not particularly. I don't really like the whole "not having reads on Day 1" thing, but that isn't really AI and more of a pet peeve of mine. Anyways, you're currently null (maybe Town-lean) for me now.In post 757, gerryoat wrote:I was at work, i was swamped this week so I only got to post once every so often, and didn't get to read much or give much thought into posts during sometimes, like those you mentioned before. Now that I've cleared that up, is there any other reason you scumread me?
UNVOTE: gerryoat- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
When did I say anything about solving the entire game? Are you referring to me pointing out you calling out random names? Speaking of which, where did those come from and, on a related note, where did the 50/50 on Aeronaut being scum come from (669)?In post 769, Titus wrote:
You expect me to have the entire game solved by post 1000? When I hate D1?In post 751, DanelerH wrote:
In 321, Gerry starts the game to get activity going. At the beginning of it, though, he chose not to play. If he cared about it, he would've given a read on Keyenpeydee. It makes me read that post as an attempt to look like he was doing something, while also not doing anything.In post 733, Torque wrote:Why the hell is him not playing his own game AI zzz
What do you think of Wisdom v Titus?
As for Wisdom vs Titus, Titus doesn't sound too good. I don't particularly like 630. She sounds angry in it, which is the easiest emotion to fake. "It's your entire ISO" sounds a bit forced, as it's not giving a proper example (granted, Wisdom used a similar line in 724). 631 and 632 sound like random names Titus is throwing around, considering she hadn't previously said anything about either Torque or Accountant being scummy.
I'm not angry, but annoyed. Town has poked me. You don't poke mama bear and expect it to be not annoyed.- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Okay, but how does that explain calling out Torque and Accoutnant (631, 632)?In post 807, Titus wrote:Vote count positions and explaining why Wisdom is tunnelling on me but avoiding voting me. That suggests Wis/Aeronaut, and scum did not want to overload.
Wis/Kelvin/Aeronaut explains why the wagons are the way they are, but Wisdom could be buddying Aeronaut.- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
So there was no actual reason? You really were just calling out random names?In post 809, Titus wrote:
Scumhunting and backups. I no longer think Torque is viable based on reactions, and interactions.In post 808, DanelerH wrote:
Okay, but how does that explain calling out Torque and Accoutnant (631, 632)?In post 807, Titus wrote:Vote count positions and explaining why Wisdom is tunnelling on me but avoiding voting me. That suggests Wis/Aeronaut, and scum did not want to overload.
Wis/Kelvin/Aeronaut explains why the wagons are the way they are, but Wisdom could be buddying Aeronaut.- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I don't know. They just feel Towny to me. It's what I have to go on, since I can't Town-hunt well.In post 815, Fro99er wrote:@Dan-- what about my posts read town to you? Because I'm not buying you can read me this accurately with never having played with me before.
I know that I'm being scum-read. It just doesn't matter to me. If you're looking for me to defend myself, I suppose I do have one question that will lead to a defense.In post 858, XnadrojX wrote:I personally am going to leave the Wisdom/Titus thing alone for today, I'd like to see more of DanelerH. His recent posts are unconvincing to me, he's been acting unaware of the fact people scumread him.
@Wisdom, why do you scum-read me?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Because Wisdom's answer is the one I'm most interested in.In post 895, Gamma Emerald wrote:WHy are you asking Wisdom and not anyone else?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Why aren't you answering my question?In post 898, Wisdom wrote:
Why are you not voting titus despite what you pointed out in 751?In post 894, DanelerH wrote:@Wisdom, why do you scum-read me?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Explain how my posts are scummy, then.In post 904, Wisdom wrote:because ive already said i find your posts scummy and the other reason is what i asked you- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
So you're choosing to not explain why you find someone suspicious, then?In post 907, Wisdom wrote:i have no obligation to convince you youre scum- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
In 647, you said that I'm obvious scum and less capable of fighting it. Despite this, you have given no explanation for why I'm scum. If I'm unable to fight it, why not give an explanation?In post 910, Wisdom wrote:sure? Its not like i cant get you roped on sheer will- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
This posting serves no purpose other than to dodge my question.In post 916, Wisdom wrote:
This posting serves no purpose other than attempting to discredit my scumread on youIn post 913, DanelerH wrote:
In 647, you said that I'm obvious scum and less capable of fighting it. Despite this, you have given no explanation for why I'm scum. If I'm unable to fight it, why not give an explanation?In post 910, Wisdom wrote:sure? Its not like i cant get you roped on sheer will- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I have two Town motivations. First, I'm seeing whether or not you're scum based on your response to my question. Second, I can't defend myself against nothing. Once I see why you scum-read me, I can answer why you're wrong.In post 920, Wisdom wrote:Does dan actually have any town motivation for insisting to hear why hes being scumread? Or is there obvious scum motivation in that?- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
So far, you aren't looking good, especially due to the lack of an answer.In post 927, Wisdom wrote:
so, whats the verdict?In post 924, DanelerH wrote:First, I'm seeing whether or not you're scum based on your response to my question- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Too bad. Answer it.In post 931, Wisdom wrote:i believe you know the answer to that- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
You're still not explaining your reads. Though you explained why in 1129, it's extremely flawed logic. Your "reason" is because then scum can't look like Town, but you also deny the chance for Town to look Town. You did the same thing to Titus. You didn't express your concerns, which gave Titus nothing to defend against, which led to her lynch.
VOTE: Wisdom
@Cabd, I am not unblockable.- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I know it was bad, but I had to get it out. Wisdom's anti-Town, single-player playstyle is extremely frustrating to me. Admittedly, I did miss Gamma's post about the soft-confirm (1235; only saw the "yeah" part and thought it was in response to Torque's 1234). I'm not going to throw out the idea that they might be scum together, though this scenario seems improbable.
Cabd's claim that there's only one unblockable on each side sounds promising. I believe it's worth pursuing.
UNVOTE: Wisdom
VOTE: gerryoat- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
Don't bother. I'm dying on Night 2.In post 1302, Wisdom wrote:
wrongIn post 1295, Gamma Emerald wrote:LOL
Anyway, I think to optimal course today is to lynch Gerry. I don't know why so many other wagons are forming.
optimal course is to lynch dan- DanelerH
-
DanelerH Townie
- DanelerH
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 3, 2016
I'm a one-shot Lightning Rod. I'm going to be using the action tonight. It's unlikely we have another protective role, so I will most likely die.In post 1321, Edosurist wrote:@Dan: Your role states that you die N2? I would think scum would want to keep you for a mislynch target.
In order:In post 1353, Edosurist wrote:I read through for Dan, Frog and Torque, like Frog requested.
What gave me the gut read on Dan was the combination of my earlier read on him and the way he was frustrated. I'd also be frustrated if people were inexplicably calling me scummy, but the way he's acting on it is troubling. 1253 is where he looks the worst. It's misrepresenting how the Titus mislynch happened. I'm not saying frustration can only come from town, but he's basically stopped commenting on anything other than Wisdom.
My initial vote on Dan (442) was mostly because Dan seemed to just be asking questions of other people and not offering his own scumreads. That's not really valid at this point other than he's continuing to not really give reads.
Surely only scum can do this
1253 was to vent my frustrations. I probably should've left it unposted, but it's too late to do anything about it now.
I was commenting on Wisdom because he was (and still is) my biggest scum-read (Gamma is another, but not as much as Wisdom).
I have since given my reads. Not much has changed, so there hasn't been a need to post an updated one. At the time I had switched my vote to Gerry, it was after Wisdom had been "cleared" by Gamma (reluctantly putting them both as Town), but this has since been disproven.
UNVOTE: gerryoat
VOTE: Wisdom
After the Global Voyeur claim, that's unlikely. While it could've been a safe assumption that there isn't another investigative role, it still seems a like a very risky claim that scum wouldn't want to make.In post 1372, Wisdom wrote:Third is likely not frogger though, so maybe torque? - DanelerH
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH
- DanelerH