how is kasumeat not as much scum as flubberIn post 2852, rb wrote:lmfao
im so done with this game
VOTE [1] FLUBBER FOR EUPHORIC FEELING OF SEEING SCUM FLIP
This type of statement is bad. We're at MyLo-1. We can't be tunneling going into the next day.In post 2857, Melanora wrote:I still think that voting cooldog is a play, and if Flubber flips town, RB is basically conf scum in my eyes, but I'll play this game.
VOTE: /vote Flubber
what's your current thoughts on a flubber-kasum scumteam, and whats your thoughts on me?In post 2857, Melanora wrote:I still think that voting cooldog is a play, and if Flubber flips town, RB is basically conf scum in my eyes, but I'll play this game.
VOTE: /vote Flubber
Michael/gamma, would you describe mel's play as living up to her stated pro-town style?In post 714, Melanora wrote:I really want to know, what's so horrifying about someone selecting a vote that they stick by? When I do make my vote, it will be for a reason, a reason which I will defend, and a reason which I will thoroughly and clearly explain. Should my vote be wrong, I will defend myself then as well, instead of being wishy washy, and simply blending in, and voting with everyone else.
I don't scum lurk, I give opinions.
Does that make you nervous, because you can't accuse me of being scum wishy washy and you can't accuse me of just wagonning and sheeping to go for an easy mislynch? It should make you nervous, if you're scum.
if you think RB is confscum why are you not .In post 2857, Melanora wrote:I still think that voting cooldog is a play, and if Flubber flips town, RB is basically conf scum in my eyes, but I'll play this game.
VOTE: /vote Flubber
In post 2860, Backhand wrote:Michael/gamma, would you describe mel's play as living up to her stated pro-town style?In post 714, Melanora wrote:I really want to know, what's so horrifying about someone selecting a vote that they stick by? When I do make my vote, it will be for a reason, a reason which I will defend, and a reason which I will thoroughly and clearly explain. Should my vote be wrong, I will defend myself then as well, instead of being wishy washy, and simply blending in, and voting with everyone else.
I don't scum lurk, I give opinions.
Does that make you nervous, because you can't accuse me of being scum wishy washy and you can't accuse me of just wagonning and sheeping to go for an easy mislynch? It should make you nervous, if you're scum.
AgreeIn post 2865, Michael Lee wrote:In post 2860, Backhand wrote:Michael/gamma, would you describe mel's play as living up to her stated pro-town style?In post 714, Melanora wrote:I really want to know, what's so horrifying about someone selecting a vote that they stick by? When I do make my vote, it will be for a reason, a reason which I will defend, and a reason which I will thoroughly and clearly explain. Should my vote be wrong, I will defend myself then as well, instead of being wishy washy, and simply blending in, and voting with everyone else.
I don't scum lurk, I give opinions.
Does that make you nervous, because you can't accuse me of being scum wishy washy and you can't accuse me of just wagonning and sheeping to go for an easy mislynch? It should make you nervous, if you're scum.
I think if we lynch flubber, kasumeat, melanora, we're bound to hit at least 2 scum
NULLIn post 2837, Kasumeat wrote:Flubber + Whymafia, how do you feel about RB?
WhyMafia is probably townIn post 2837, Kasumeat wrote:Flubber + Whymafia, how do you feel about RB?
Mel's play has been bothering me as of recent but I have bigger scum reads to worry aboutIn post 2858, Gamma Emerald wrote:This type of statement is bad. We're at MyLo-1. We can't be tunneling going into the next day.In post 2857, Melanora wrote:I still think that voting cooldog is a play, and if Flubber flips town, RB is basically conf scum in my eyes, but I'll play this game.
VOTE: /vote Flubber