In post 511, Nero Cain wrote:like all you did was sit there and ask me a few times why I was scumreading you (all the while ignoring
156)
So here are my questions.
Why were you not confronting me about
156?
If you think I was scummy for not confronting you then why did you not bring it up?
If you think I need to have a conversation with you about my finding you scummy then why didn't you try to have a conversation with me prior to
477?
*I responded to 159 which basically said the same thing: "Zach is scum"
I didn't notice 156 until I saw it recently, but it's a link to my ISO. Fuck am I supposed to confront you about?
*I'm bringing it up now? Duh
*Uh... if I want to get more info from someone I interact with them I don't expect them to talk to me like they're psychic
I assumed you had reasons... and well you did sort of have . .. one reason and it's the exact surface level scumread that everyone gives me ever. Literally
Why do you act like this isn't based in logic? You're not familiar with my play. You have no idea what happens in my head before I hit the post button. So you... ask? Or just assume? These are the only two options. That's why you need to "have a conversation" because town win condition relies on information. If I hadn't said anything you probably wouldn't have done anything to this effect, maybe possibly but not likely wagoned me, then I would have flipped town and been blamed for... something. I know EXACTLY how my posts look and that's what you scumread me for.
Now I mentioned before you pushing A50 after the claim was unnecessary for scum and probably why I'm not voting you. Your responses don't make me feel good at all, but I'm under the impression that scum try not to scumread (everyone) who's scumreading them. I think
Fine with DL lynching you tho and a few others
I'll reread some other players