Mini Normal 1908 - In The Web (Game Over)

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2275 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:22 pm

In post 2273, Priscila wrote:
In post 2265, Ircher wrote:
In post 2253, Priscila wrote:You could have just said "Yes, that's how it is phrased" or "No, it says that the person doesn't have a gun / guns". It is absurdly easy to just change the wording slightly to avoid breaking the rule. And if you had responded very quickly, that would look very villagery for you. So, regardless of your alignment, your reluctance did nothing to help.

Complaining over.
Honestly don't get what you are trying to accomplish here....
Catharsis.

In post 2268, Gamma Emerald wrote:TBH I think we have the game on lock if no one disproves the current setup
Why are you so sure there will be no more power?

We have Cop/JK plus double voter and 2 shot GS vs at least a 2 shot RB. Unless scum have more in their hands I doubt town has anything more

Priscila · Post Post #2276 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:24 pm

MM4 if I remember correctly you read Grey's catchup as quite villagery. And you have me as null? This is completely absurd.

Priscila · Post Post #2277 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:26 pm

People have been discrediting me and shading me ever since I replaced in. RayFrost went 6 days without producing content after replacing in and didn't get votes, I replace in and immediately BYF aggro votes me. Gamma is fishing for a Priscila scum read. And all I have done is game solve. Ridiculous.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2278 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:27 pm

What
How have I been fishing for an SR on you

Priscila · Post Post #2279 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:27 pm

This mass claim would not even happen if not for me. I want everyone's reads on me, right now.

Priscila · Post Post #2280 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:28 pm

In post 2278, Gamma Emerald wrote:What
How have I been fishing for an SR on you

This:

In post 2270, Gamma Emerald wrote:What makes you townread Tarkus

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2281 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:29 pm

Did I say Priscila? Tarkus barely posted so I was curious about why he was a townread.

Priscila · Post Post #2282 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:31 pm

It is a subtle way to feed doubt about the read.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2283 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:32 pm

Well that was not my intent. With the explanation I feel it makes sense, but still want to think on it myself

Priscila · Post Post #2284 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:36 pm

If you believe RayFrost's claim then MM4 is confirmed innocent unless you assume there is a mafia doctor as a troll setup. You have not attempted to engage me at all, and I have displayed a strong scum read on you. Therefore I do not believe you are trying to sort me. Therefore I think your question is pointless except to feed doubt.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2285 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:39 pm

So? Just because he's town doesn't mean I can't be curious about his reads.

Priscila · Post Post #2286 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 12:41 pm

I hope to god the MMM replacement will help restore my sanity.

ISO · Post Post #2287 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:02 pm

In post 2279, Priscila wrote:This mass claim would not even happen if not for me. I want everyone's reads on me, right now.

I'm not actually sure massclaim was the best idea at the time.

ISO · Post Post #2288 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:03 pm

Nonetheless, I don't think Prisc is a good lynch today.

PenguinPower · Post Post #2289 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:07 pm

No. Gamma.

BigYoshiFan · Post Post #2290 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:31 pm

In post 2279, Priscila wrote:This mass claim would not even happen if not for me. I want everyone's reads on me, right now.

Lean-town.

There were some things I didn't like regarding you.

In post 2049, Priscila wrote:I am genuinely confused as to how I can come out with my first content as a tier list and a vote and people call that opportunistic?

Here, it felt like you were playing the innocent and naive card.

Your surprising attention to detail during RVS threw me off, but your catchup later pretty much nullifies this.
I didn't particularly like your townread on me for "keeping the peace" per se, because it seemed like a pretty shallow read and I'd probably do it whether I was scum or not, because conflicts like that don't create a fun or cormfortable atmosphere.

But there were more important things I did like.

You point out things from an objective perspective; you have both positive and negative things about each player, which makes me comfortable because doesn't feel like you're trying to force out reads. You're attention to possible partners and busses, and that they're reasonable and original reads, give me town vibes. And overall, and I think I'm stealing your words here, but it feels like an organic thought process.

PenguinPower · Post Post #2291 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:33 pm

In post 2279, Priscila wrote:I want everyone's reads on me, right now.

Oh, yeah, no to this.

BigYoshiFan · Post Post #2292 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:33 pm

So, how convincing is RayFrost's claim to you, Priscila?

PenguinPower · Post Post #2293 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:34 pm

Strongest scum read...not very...and all that.

BigYoshiFan · Post Post #2294 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:35 pm

Wait, what?

PenguinPower · Post Post #2295 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:37 pm

In post 2294, BigYoshiFan wrote:Wait, what?

In post 2169, Priscila wrote:I am scumreading his slot quite strongly, so no, I do not.

BigYoshiFan · Post Post #2296 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:38 pm

Oh, I missed that. Hmmmm.

BigYoshiFan · Post Post #2297 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:54 pm

In post 2291, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 2279, Priscila wrote:I want everyone's reads on me, right now.
Oh, yeah, no to this.

Why?

PenguinPower · Post Post #2298 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 2:57 pm

I really dislike the tone. I owe her nothing.

Priscila · Post Post #2299 (ISO) » Wed May 24, 2017 3:02 pm

In post 2287, Ircher wrote:
In post 2279, Priscila wrote:This mass claim would not even happen if not for me. I want everyone's reads on me, right now.
I'm not actually sure massclaim was the best idea at the time.

Then why did you not argue against it?