In post 1127, MariaR wrote:(expired on 2017-06-06 05:25:09) he's got until this countdown runs out to claim or I hammer
at least wait till he picks up his prod
UnaBombaH: I think Im happy you turned up to be the scum, and that you won, because I will use this game as a guideline for whenever I finally land my first scumrole.
In post 14, MarioManiac4 wrote:nah, either vig just shoots whoever or they shoot the common scumreads
telling vig to shoot you p1 is WIFOM and unhelpful
So many empty posts, if you want to call my stuff fake, actually put some stuff in the thread of substance, that's why I come daily so there's enough substance to mkae a post about it.
In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are
Makes you seem more scummy. VOTE: Mario
Nah this isn't a natural evaluation of my ISO. You're saying "Mario is scummy because there are some posts that do not have content" and calling that me not providing content, but if you evaluated it you would notice I have in fact given content.
I think it' pretty natural given that it makes up half your posts.
You're using it to justify voting me for not giving content despite the fact that I have gave content and you're just ignoring it because it doesn't fit your narrative. If there is in fact a different reason for criticising me for not giving content despite the fact that I have given content, and had given content at the time, now is the time to inform me.
In that case you should consider not making bullshit points about 'fake frustration' so it fits your narrative, yes I'm back guys.
Man next time commit to bussing your scummate would you? You really had me convinced until you backed up into stupid shit just to try and wagon on someone who wasnt The Godfather