Gamma Emerald's Large Normal Review

Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:28 pm

What is the interaction between willbooster and jailkeeper? The jailkeeper's protection is not cancelled, correct?

Post Post #3 (isolation #1) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:29 pm

yeah i don't think the scum need all the roles they have

the bulletproof strikes me as especially unnecessary

Post Post #4 (isolation #2) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:33 pm

how are you resolving two roleblockers blocking each other or etc

especially relevant with a weak rb in play

Post Post #5 (isolation #3) » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:36 pm

potential issue: if the tracker claims immediately and the JK and willbooster target him, the mafia can't do much except cry

i guess that's why they have a neapolitan? maybe that's fine just thought it should be pointed out

Post Post #14 (isolation #4) » Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:35 am

the neapolitan role PM specifies a no result option but the tracker role PM doesn't

Post Post #15 (isolation #5) » Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:37 am

having the booster stop only one RB is a decent step, though the scum are still forced to play wifom games with the JK (should we block or kill the tracker? only one will work, which is it? should they throw both at him and risk losing the kill?)

Post Post #19 (isolation #6) » Wed Jun 07, 2017 2:50 am

In post 16, Gamma Emerald wrote:Be aware that your planning assumes the roles are public in game, when they will not be.

all it takes is the tracker claiming (which, again, we shouldn't be incentivizing him to do)

Post Post #27 (isolation #7) » Thu Jun 08, 2017 5:36 am

i'm of the opinion that should be in the rules

Post Post #31 (isolation #8) » Thu Jun 08, 2017 11:58 am

i think the balance might be ok as well

swingy, as stated, but not super bad.

i'm still a little peeved that a d1 tracker claim would be good for town

Post Post #48 (isolation #9) » Thu Jun 15, 2017 9:25 am

i guess im ok with this

wouldn't be opposed to nerfing one of the scum roles though