Mini Normal 1919: Endgame
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
not really. if somebody is in a time zone that isn't morning right now they could logically deduce that I am in a time zone where it was. If they somehow weren't able to do that, they could ask me what time zone I was in.
my opinion stands, it was stupid for him to find my statement weird so that's one strike against him- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
I am not going to continue this conversation after this post.
I literally just explained why it was stupid to think it was weird. and because of emp's question I explained why somebody in a different time zone shouldn't think it was weird. there is literally no logical explanation for anyone to think my opening post is weird, yet you have said you found it weird. So since you have no logical reason for thinking that, you get a strike against you.
there is nothing weird about saying good morning in the morning. do you go to work/school/whatever and think people are weird for saying that? no probably not so there is no reason to think it is weird here.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
scummy strikeIn post 27, Carcalilly wrote:And @Twoface,
Is that a strike... For what? For pressure, or is that a "this is scummy" strike? Do you have legitimate suspicion on Mulch?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
I never said it makes him more likely to be scum though. I just found what he did to be scummy and if he does enough scummy things then he will be more likely to be scum.In post 35, Carcalilly wrote:
Would you care to explain how this makes them more likely to be scum in your eyes?In post 33, TwoFace wrote:
scummy strikeIn post 27, Carcalilly wrote:And @Twoface,
Is that a strike... For what? For pressure, or is that a "this is scummy" strike? Do you have legitimate suspicion on Mulch?
my scum reads are almost always based off a scummy body of work.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
lol. I'm the only normal one here so far.In post 67, Trivium wrote:VOTE: TwoFace For being weird.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
NO i didn't make anything weird. The only one who made the time thing weird was the person who found it weird for someone to say good morning.In post 73, Trivium wrote:I'm actually sort of serious about my TwoFace vote. He made the time thing weird, and it stood out.
Strike for you- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
please no wallsIn post 128, Carcalilly wrote:wall incoming- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
I find it funny you say this, that is sort of how he reads to me right nowIn post 127, Sergtacos wrote:How do I know if you're not saying this to look like you're town?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
now people say I scum read people for bad reasons sometimes but he has literally only made one post so I am calling a flag on the play.In post 145, Sergtacos wrote:But hey, my vote still stays on Klazam. He's scum, PERIOD. You scum buddy scummy scum you xD- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
collaborate and listenIn post 150, ThinkBig wrote:Stop- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
the mod typed stop so he could grab the page top. he later edited in his vote countIn post 154, Sergtacos wrote:Who stop? What, where do you see this? I only see vote counts and why isn't my vote on Klazam?
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
scummy doesn't mean scum though. Right now I have 3 players I think are scummy but neither of them have done enough to make me think they are scum yet. (read 54 for a better understanding about how I work)In post 157, Tchill13 wrote:Not sure why taco and twoface imply carcalilly seems scummy then doesn't vote them. That's seems odd to me.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
and why is that exactly?In post 166, Tchill13 wrote:Twoface is the only other one I'm concerned with- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
damn you know what I hate more than anything? liars. there was no overreaction by me. my reaction was calm, rational and most important completely justified.In post 183, Tchill13 wrote:Twoface your overreaction on mulch wasn't enough to out right scum read you but it's worth keeping in mind.
VOTE: tchill- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Calling somebody scummy is scummy? Cmon have you ever played before?In post 210, Klazam wrote:Found it. It was Twoface with the "scummy strike". Gut's pinging me on that. can wait, i have a tunnel to get to digging, though.
Sergtacos- Your scum read of me is based on what?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Literally making no sense right now.In post 232, Klazam wrote:its not that you called him scummy, its the manner in which you did.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Cause it's true.In post 212, Carcalilly wrote:I like this for some reason.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Everything about this post is wrongIn post 224, Trivium wrote:
TwoFace voting Tchill for merely saying he overreacted.In post 186, TwoFace wrote:
damn you know what I hate more than anything? liars. there was no overreaction by me. my reaction was calm, rational and most important completely justified.In post 183, Tchill13 wrote:Twoface your overreaction on mulch wasn't enough to out right scum read you but it's worth keeping in mind.
VOTE: tchill
There is such as thing as being too defensive. Town obviously also want to seem town so they don't get lynched, but scum are going to want that much more, so they get defensive over it. Scum also tend to try to say their actions were justified and try to rationalize the situation.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
There is no such thing as being overly defensive. Next?
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
My top scum reads ATM are the 2 who have blatantly lied. Town should never lie.In post 238, Mulch wrote:Twoface: Top 3 scum and town?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
I'm not trying to be anything actuallyIn post 248, Sergtacos wrote:TwoFace trying to be defensive so hard.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Again. NO FUCKING SUCH THING.In post 252, Klazam wrote:Being too defensive- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
In post 255, Mulch wrote:Defensiveness is NAI
:thumbs up:In post 256, Mulch wrote:UNVOTE:
Worst possible thing ever, saying someone is defensive so they are scum- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
He deserved to be discredited. Did you seriously see how bad his post was? Fucking terribleIn post 258, Trivium wrote:Being defensive in a jumpy way, and then saying "Am I in the newbie que" as a way to discredit people? No, it's not the worst thing in the world to scumread someone for that. Scum are much more likely to act like this, without a doubt.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
No it's not. Like it at all.In post 262, Tchill13 wrote:explaining there's no such thing as too defensive. That's debatable.
There is literally no such thing as being too defensive. You are either defensive or you aren't. But it doesn't matter anyway cause being defensive isn't scummy nor is it alignment indicative. It's play style and nothing more.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
I sided with you multiple times?In post 271, Sergtacos wrote:he kept siding with me.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
No it wasn't but I'll say that anyone who thinks defensiveness is scummy probably should go play there until they learn otherwise.In post 273, Carcalilly wrote:The "newbie que" remark wasn't about defensiveness if I remember- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Buckle in. It's going to get worse especially if people don't drop this stupid defensive bullshitIn post 274, Sergtacos wrote:This game is a total headache. I sense this game has all the jack of trades have trust issues to the max xD- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Why is the truth funny to you?In post 289, Trivium wrote:
I laughed audibly.In post 286, TwoFace wrote:
I'm not trying to be anything actuallyIn post 248, Sergtacos wrote:TwoFace trying to be defensive so hard.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
You don't get to tell others how to play. Certainly not me especially when I've already caught one scum possibly two and am voting one of them right now.In post 290, Klazam wrote:Jesus fuck two face-to-face you have to fucking scumhunt here, not just defend yourself and say nothing else
The moment you said I was scummy for saying somebody else wa scummy you pretty much lost all credibility with me.
Worry about what you're doing and not what I'm doing. I'm a big boy.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Don't be lazy man.In post 297, Klazam wrote:2face, you said someone lied, who?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Who was this directed at?In post 299, Tchill13 wrote:I agree EXCEPT for rvs. It's random. You should know the votes you get on you are random.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Another lieIn post 307, Tchill13 wrote:Either way two-face hasn't scum hunted at all.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
It shouldn't be. It should be about finding scum. I think I've found 2 already so clearly I'm doing my jobIn post 315, Carcalilly wrote:But isn't mafia all about worrying about what everyone else is doing? ^- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
You blatantly lied about me. Lying is confirmed scum in my book. You were the first so yes you got voted first.In post 318, Tchill13 wrote:What's the difference between me and klazam two face and why did I get the vote? Just because I was first?- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
This is good advice. Something people tell me over and over again. Maybe I'll listen one day. Maybe it'll be this game but for right now I like my vote. If these people somehow redeem themselves I'll back off but I have a very low tolerance for lying. I don't lie as town and as scum I do it as little as possible. It's the way I was raised I guess.In post 323, Empiricus wrote:Also this rubs me the wrong way, but maybe that's just because I have thin skin or something. You really should leave som room for if you're wrong, because if you are and get a better scum tell later you might want to convince others that you are right. You are not going to do that by alienating folks by writing them off before 24 hours into day one of this game.
I don't see why a town player would say something about me that is blatantly false.
Like my stuff later in the game people can clearly make the argument that I'm being defensive (though correcting people who are saying false statements imo isn't being defensive. It's correcting their mistakes) but no way can anyone sit there and honestly say that I was defensive with regards to the whole morning conversation.
The person who deserved scrutiny in that exchange is mulch. It's normal behavior to say good morning in the morning. It's abnormal behavior to think somebody is strange for saying good morning in the morning. It's even worse to say it's "weird as hell" which is what he did. Now if it's not morning in your time zone, that's fine but it's still not weird and it certainly isn't "weird as hell"- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
You mean the defensiveness that you lied about? Yeah it's best if you move on from it.In post 326, Tchill13 wrote:I was talking about defensiveness two-face. I'm not going to talk about it anymore.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Look I'm simple. If people say things that aren't true I'm going to call them out on it. If they say things about me tat aren't true I'm going to do it even harder.In post 331, Klazam wrote:2face: i just iso'd you. its literally consisting of you attacking people for expressing suspicion of you. 100%. you call people liars for trying to read you- the first one because that person said you overreacted- which you did- then the second because you placed a omgus vote- WHICH YOU DID, IN ESSENCE.
Then your ad hom attacks on me. <sergtaco: ad hom = ad hominem = attacking the person instead of addressing the arugement, which is what he did by insinuating im bad enough at this game and i need to go play newbs>
Oh, while you did that, you also tried to say that i thought you were scummy BECAUSE you called someone scummy? FALSE. I said its the manner in which you did so.
you okay, bud?
The people that I found suspicious all deserved that suspicion.
Moving on. The people who I called liars ACTUALLY lied. So they deserve to be called liars
Anyone who says I overreacted early on is a straight up liar cause it didn't happen and I've explained that now in detail. I reacted logically to an illogical response.
I didn't place an omgus vote either. I voted a person who did the unforgiving act of lying.
Please if you're going to deal with me. Please get your facts straight.
On to the ad-hom attacks. You said I was suspicious because I called somebody out as suspicious.
I'm sorry if that hurt your feelings or whatever but no player with actual experience should find that suspicious. The point of this game is to find scum and to do that you have to call people scummy.
There was nothing wrong with the manner I did it either but clearly you are entitled to your opinion no matter how wrong it is.
Don't worry about how I'm doing. It's none of your business how I am.
I'll say this. If you are town. Step up your game cause you are weak right now. You are finding things suspicious that aren't suspicious.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Stop right there. People who lie don't get to accuse others of being bad. Plus I'm not bad.In post 335, Klazam wrote:UNVOTE:
nah this is town. bad town but town.
ill reread later and decide who to go after.
I may have a bad game once in a while especially when townies do stupid things to distract me from finding the real scum but I'm definitely not bad.
If you/tchill/mulch/that dude with a C are all town, y'all will infuriate me so much.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
@emp. Having trouble just isolating your post so I'll just respond here.
My issue is with regards to the early part of the game. There was just a simple conversation. I made a comment. Mulch made a comment that didn't really make sense to me (and tbh I don't know it made sense to anyone else) and I responded back explaining and so in and so forth.
That by definition is a conversation between 2 people. There was no defensiveness nor overreacting.
If you don't like something somebody does don't just cast shade on it with a lame buzz word like it means something. It makes you sound more intelligent when you actually explain why you don't like something. Like what I did with mulch.
Explaining myself so my thought process isn't being defensive. Anyone who says it is, I don't trust them or their opinions.
People need to stop adding "over" to things also. A person is defensive and/or reactive. There is no such thing as being overly defensive or too defensive or over reacting and neither of those things are alignment indicative.
If you don't like how someone is acting say so and explain why using words. Much like I did when I explained why I didn't like mulch's posts.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
FixedIn post 361, TwoFace wrote:Explaining myself so my thought process is transparent isn't being defensive. Anyone who says it is, I don't trust them or their opinions.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
That was in response to your post to me. About difference of opinions and what not. People just label my posts with different buzz words in an attempt to cast shade on me.
I explained why I found mulch's post scummy and it gets shaded as defensiveness or whatever. I've never heard anyone calling a logical explanation of something as defensive. That's why I felt it was a lie instead of a difference of opinion.
Lots of people tossed that word around unfairly imo.
Those people I seriously doubt are town because they would rather hide behind those words (which imo are usually used by scum more so than town anyway) instead of taking the time to explain what's actually wrong or scummy with them.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Please show where I "defended like crazy over rvs" please.In post 368, Sergtacos wrote:TwoFace- Defended like crazy over a RVS? Still trying to be defensive.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
Im not being lazy. I'm already on record explaining how it never happened and you've ignored that and say it did.In post 374, Sergtacos wrote:In post 322, TwoFace wrote:
Don't be lazy man.In post 297, Klazam wrote:2face, you said someone lied, who?
^
Plus if we are going to get technical. Rvs ended the moment mulch voted me for an in game reason.- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
- TwoFace
-
TwoFace Jack of All Trades
- TwoFace
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6397
- Joined: September 1, 2016
In post 186, TwoFace wrote:
damn you know what I hate more than anything? liars. there was no overreaction by me. my reaction was calm, rational and most important completely justified.In post 183, Tchill13 wrote:Twoface your overreaction on mulch wasn't enough to out right scum read you but it's worth keeping in mind.
VOTE: tchill - TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace
- TwoFace