Mafiascum.net

ISO · Post **#225** (ISO) » Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:45 am

Goo wincon says "you have majority and there are no other killers." We can't achieve majority but the town wincon says "you win when all the bad guys are gone." So I imagine it's open to interpretation a bit.

ISO · Post **#226** (ISO) » Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:41 am

Town wins I think, since Brie can't be lynched.

ISO · Post **#227** (ISO) » Fri Jun 09, 2017 9:42 am

I don't really know though. We could leave it up to them.

ISO · Post **#228** (ISO) » Fri Jun 09, 2017 10:55 am

If neither Town not Goo win, then I declare the Mafia as winners!

ISO · Post **#229** (ISO) » Fri Jun 09, 2017 10:34 pm

Lol.

The way I see it is, if TheBrie and Creature are the only ones alive, it will go into an endless loop of nolynch and no action, therefore draw.

ISO · Post **#230** (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:10 pm

In post 229, eagerSnake wrote:Lol.

The way I see it is, if TheBrie and Creature are the only ones alive, it will go into an endless loop of nolynch and no action, therefore draw.

This is disappointing, but I agree.

Town needs no antagonizing force to win, and the Goo is an antagonizing force (albeit powerless).
Goo needs majority, which they cannot achieve.

ISO · Post **#231** (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:11 pm

We... make an exception and both town and goo win?

ISO · Post **#232** (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:52 pm

In post 231, Rautherdir wrote:We... make an exception and both town and goo win?

That's the draw

ISO · Post **#233** (ISO) » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:57 pm

Oh. Right.

ISO · Post **#234** (ISO) » Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:27 pm

Replace all three of them so we can get this over with.

ISO · Post **#235** (ISO) » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:57 pm

If only they knew that a non-violent town and non-violent goo tied the game then they would know that they should both claim goo

ISO · Post **#236** (ISO) » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:07 pm

At the same time, that could throw in the WIFOM of "well there is no more goo. He is mafia and I am the other townie."

ISO · Post **#237** (ISO) » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:11 pm

i just wish Snarky was actually trying in some shape or form

ISO · Post **#238** (ISO) » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:24 pm

In post 237, GuiltyLion wrote:i just wish Snarky was actually trying in some shape or form

Snarky usually gets by as scum by the town imploding. :lol:

Like, imagine The Brie not buying Creature's claim and buying Snarky's (which was impressive btw). We COULD win the game still. :lol:

ISO · Post **#239** (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:27 am

Oh wow

ISO · Post **#240** (ISO) » Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:53 pm

In post 1260, SnarkySnowman wrote:Unvote quick before creature quickhammers. Let's talk more.

1. Look at the rauth wagon again, point out the goo. Why couldn't scum have become goo?
2. Creatures role is not provable. It's an easy fakeclaim.
3. Census taker saying 3:1:town is not exactly a stretch of a guess if you fakeclaimed. Not that I don't believe your role, but still I'm considering you.

1. Because it says town players
2. It is provable because JavaJoe had it.
3. Not really.

ISO · Post **#241** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:42 am

In post 1263, SnarkySnowman wrote:As podo's "investigative" on me, I feel like that's a red herring. He's goo, and that makes him someone to be targeted => goo gets more goo, is one explanation for why he'd do that.

This is a really smart argument. I doubt it will get a bite, because the argument that I was likely goo during day one has its own flaws, but this is some good supporting evidence.

ISO · Post **#242** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:30 am

In post 241, podoboq wrote:
In post 1263, SnarkySnowman wrote:As podo's "investigative" on me, I feel like that's a red herring. He's goo, and that makes him someone to be targeted => goo gets more goo, is one explanation for why he'd do that.

This is a really smart argument. I doubt it will get a bite, because the argument that I was likely goo during day one has its own flaws, but this is some good supporting evidence.

Census taker...

ISO · Post **#243** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:22 pm

yah Snarky is making good posts now, gogogo mafia. I apologize for 237 I was real cranky on Monday cause I sprained my ankle and I'm going to a music festival this weekend

ISO · Post **#244** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:30 pm

In post 242, Rautherdir wrote:
In post 241, podoboq wrote:
In post 1263, SnarkySnowman wrote:As podo's "investigative" on me, I feel like that's a red herring. He's goo, and that makes him someone to be targeted => goo gets more goo, is one explanation for why he'd do that.

This is a really smart argument. I doubt it will get a bite, because the argument that I was likely goo during day one has its own flaws, but this is some good supporting evidence.

Census taker...

Yeah, as I said, it has flaws, but I think the argument is that I started the game as goo.

"podoboq's play baited town to target him (with investigation, protecting, or otherwise). That compounded on him flipping goo after night one implies that he was the starting goo."

I can see buying that.

ISO · Post **#245** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:42 pm

In post 1266, TheBrie wrote:But neither of you seem that smart.

LOL @ how innocently she slipped that in there. :lol:

ISO · Post **#246** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 1266, TheBrie wrote:Maybe scum remembered the revive was out there and guessed I was the most likely recipient. But neither of you seem that smart.

fucking kek

ISO · Post **#247** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:04 pm

Brie just went gangsta.

ISO · Post **#248** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:09 pm

Lmao damn.

ISO · Post **#249** (ISO) » Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:01 pm

In post 1266, TheBrie wrote:Maybe scum remembered the revive was out there and guessed I was the most likely recipient. But neither of you seem that smart.

Brie, please sig this after the game. K thx

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1907: Mod/Dead PT