In post 330, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:
If you -are- town, then anti-town -is- Anti-wincon. Unless you're claiming to have a different wincon from Town?
yes, I don't know why so many people fail to recognize this and try not to play anti-town, the game is so much more interesting when everyone plays as pro-town as possible
In post 333, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:
One so far before the other head and I start picking apart any specific posts. Every single game I have seen with both Titus and Math that ended up in them arguing and scumreading each other (in present memory at least), one of the two is scum.
it's a little early though, I'd think it best to wait another Day or 2 to see how it goes between them to truly determine 1 way or the other
In post 338, CommKnight wrote:
Also if we could know 100% town/mafia between Math/Titus, my money is 100% on Math being town and Titus being scum. Definitely NOT vice versa.
I would be opposite, but I don't discount they could both be town or both be scum either - however I have a bigger scumlean on clumsy phoenix atm which makes me think math and titus are town (that single post let's me know CPh is not scum with either of them, which is nice)
In post 351, Titus wrote:
Math tunnels based on their definition of anti-town. Math not SRing anti-town play is scummy.
agree, math and I have very similar views on what is anti-town and our attitude towards it, but there are still times that it doesn't create a tunnel or you still wait for other things/information to build before digging in to the player that did it, math doesn't always tunnel
immediately
in this situation don't think (I still have a slight scumlean on math)
agree up until your recent exchange with them
In post 373, Democracy wrote:He can't use the actual scenario that happened because then it would both demonstrate how his logic doesn't align as well as how he dodged the question so he has to use a math metaphor instead to try to be funny and distract.
starting to be on board with this, actually - you were right about the picture posting too, and I only have 1 game with commknight and they were ubertown, so, I can see issues with comm definitely, but not to the point of OMG LYNCH like you
In post 391, Democracy wrote:Like other people are calling you much worse things in the pt.
But I don't really get mad at VIs in games. If they're tolerable I'm okay with it. If they're obnoxious I simply move them to a blacklist.
this seems really extreme
In post 392, CommKnight wrote:
LOL I don't care what they're calling me. Ask drealmerz. We're still playing together after we were at each other's throats in a previous game where I had him and his buddy hardcore pegged early on. He called me much worse things that I bet half of your heads are calling me. But that's the intensity of the game right there. Tensions go high, but no jimmies of mine are rustled.
did I really call you bad things? - and that game was so unfair, and finding us was scum has maybe never been easier in a game
In post 394, Democracy wrote:Hmm dreamz is a read we're torn about.
I think me and nancy have him as scum lean.
Jaereed and LUV (I think?) has him as town. Though jaereed said it's weak.
seriously don't even know how anyone can pretend to have a read on me this early, honestly
I'm a D2 sort in pretty much all games, ppl try to sort me D1 just more likely to make mistakes
In post 399, CommKnight wrote:I count 16 VI's all in a PT who are wasting time with insults rather than figure this out.
Too bad Alchemist wasn't one of the heads. He'd had already figured out what I'm doing and why I'm doing it.
meh, your questions are rather pointless and you're wasting time with all that crap, can you focus elsewhere?
In post 405, Titus wrote:
Scum Drealmerz was aggressive in In Memory. He was just ridiculously absurd aggressive and doing nothing worthwhile. Math had convinced me to policy him the day he shot us as last scum.
meh, again, I only became so aggro at frozenangel because I really thought she was being difficult with me and antagonizing me on purpose - anyway, my play varies from game to game, gotta really try and learn to read me in a single game not compare it to how I was in any other games because it just doesn't hold - I dunno how many times I gotta tell ppl that
ugh, I sucked bad in laundry, democracy, I agree, but that's not totally standard for me, please realize, I probably don't suck at least 1/3 - 1/4 games (:
and then there are games like mystic where I suck with my play but my reads are pretty decent
I feel good about this game tho, I really think ppl need to get off trying to have certainty-sorts on D1 though, especially before page 25-30 - eegh. I mean I'm scumleaning math too, but, geez, gotta give it some time to feel how secure it is and what other people bring to the table so the picture is fuller before judging so hard
In post 407, Democracy wrote:Okay I think most of us agree on a read
that is randomidget town
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DEMOCRACY AT WORK
WOOOOOOOOOO, how premature, total huge pings here
oh and I don't know how I feel about navy yet