Mini Normal 1920 (Game Over)

[Bomberman]

Well, if you really believed in everything you're saying was for the benefit of town, you wouldn't make posts that posture yourself like #108

..If you aren't nervous, why are you responding to me so haphazardly? This shouldn't even be a discussion from your perspective if I am just neglecting your 'legitimate efforts'

[Mulch]

Explain about 108. I see no relevance and I think your full of shit. I'm responding to you because I'm not taking bullshit from anyone this game and I'm calling it out.

Oh, and you just did strawman.

[EeveeLution Army]

It's poorly executed and you look extremely nervous

It's very well done, actually. Unless you can name things that are poorly executed, I'm calling bullshit.

You obviously don't know how to read people. I doubt you even use GAMM.

I dislike the way you are stating this. It feels like you are saying only you are allowed to make reads and anyone else who tries is wrong. I honestly don't think self-centeredness is alignment indicative but it is annoying because it makes it feel like you don't want/care about others reads.

[Bomberman]

I won't entertain circular logic, Mulch

[Mulch]

It's poorly executed and you look extremely nervous

It's very well done, actually. Unless you can name things that are poorly executed, I'm calling bullshit.

You obviously don't know how to read people. I doubt you even use GAMM.

I dislike the way you are stating this. It feels like you are saying only you are allowed to make reads and anyone else who tries is wrong. I honestly don't think self-centeredness is alignment indicative but it is annoying because it makes it feel like you don't want/care about others reads.

Did you dislike how the other person said my style of reads was worthless and poorly executed? Do you think that shows self centeredness from HIS point of view? I'm curious to why you are trying to attack me and not him.


That aside, that was a bit obnoxious by me, lol.

[Mulch]

I won't entertain circular logic, Mulch

VOTE: Bomberman

[Mulch]

Not one thing I have said is circular. YOu came here trying to get an easy read by discrediting my reads and attacking my style of playing and have had ZERO defense to anything I have said, and every time I make a point you either go to a different topic. I think you are full of shit.

[EeveeLution Army]

Where did he say your style of reads are worthless. All i see is him saying it was poorly executed. Also bomber has an eye on him for his post at top of this page. He gives a number but doesn't actually link to it.

[Mulch]

Yes, I am reading this in association because you called these 3 specifically the scumteam, and quite frankly the post you compiled feels purely conjecture and

I think nobody should entertain it

, so I would suggest that you either give the thread more room to grow if you're just being antsy

@eevee check out the bold part

[Bomberman]

There's nothing I gain out of interacting with you at this moment if you're going to just defend yourself blindly instead of seeing that perhaps you need to change your mindset/attitude. Note that I haven't voted you because I believe there is a slight chance you are just Noobtown, but I will say that if you continue to play in the way you are I would have no issue voting you

[Mulch]

@Bomberman do you use GAMM?



@everyone you can see plain as day that I have just destroyed every single thought process he has had and that his response is that "I'm not TALKING to you" like he is a fucking three year old or something. Make your own judgements as you wish.

[Mulch]

What is more, you should not be trying to discard someone's behavior whether they are a noob or not. This is what I was townread for when I was scum in Penguin's Mafia Redux. If you think I am scummy, fucking vote me.

[EeveeLution Army]

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrong here.

[Mulch]

And when you vote me, the town will look at your arguements with more strutiny and see that you are wrong, so I highly doubt you have the fucking guts to vote me regardless of your allignment.

[Tchill13]

It's poorly executed and you look extremely nervous

Mulch do you think this slot comes off as eager try hard town? The nervous part doesn't make sense to me. Comes off as trying to make something out of nothing. Can't tell if it's scum or eager town though.

[EeveeLution Army]

There's nothing I gain out of interacting with you at this moment if you're going to just defend yourself blindly instead of seeing that perhaps you need to change your mindset/attitude. Note that I haven't voted you because I believe there is a slight chance you are just Noobtown, but I will say that if you continue to play in the way you are I would have no issue voting you

I wouldn't call him noobtown as much as a bit of an egotist. Similar but not entirely the same. Also he did admit that his statement back there wasn't the best.

[Mulch]

Hmm my lingo is rusty what is GAMM again? Also yeah i don't like how he completely tosses away your reads. He should at least explain why its wrong here.

It's not common; I think I created it, I forgot to explain it early game.

Gut, Authenticity, Motivation, and Meta. Those are the 4 things everyone should be reading others on.

[Mulch]

It's poorly executed and you look extremely nervous

Mulch do you think this slot comes off as eager try hard town? The nervous part doesn't make sense to me. Comes off as trying to make something out of nothing. Can't tell if it's scum or eager town though.

I don't know what it is, but it's wrong.

[Mulch]

He can't explain why it is wrong because he either is town with deluded ways to read people/can't even acknoledge unconventional arguements/tactics, or he is scum that thought I would be a pushover and came empty handed.

[EeveeLution Army]

I agree with three of those things. Meta however. Meta can change if the player is good enough to see it.

[Mulch]

I agree with three of those things. Meta however. Meta can change if the player is good enough to see it.

Eh that is one for if you know a person well.


On the other hand, people like him probably read people based on logic, which is a HEAVILY bad way to play the game as it can be emulated as both scum and town.

What is more, bad logic is subjective and is done often by bad town as much as bad scum.

[EeveeLution Army]

Logic is what we see as true. If scum is good enough your "logic" will be a well constructed lie.

[Mulch]

This man discredits me and tries to then backtrack his arguement by saying I am "noob town" and is not going to vote me? LMAO what a coward. VOTE ME if you think I am scummy.

[Mulch]

And then see how the town agreess. And if you are town who think I am scummy, RE EVALUATE.

[Mulch]

Logic is what we see as true. If scum is good enough your "logic" will be a well constructed lie.

Yes. It's a bad way to read people. Authenticity is better. If someone is BELIEVING what they are saying, even if they have the worst logic in the world, that makes them town.