In post 1617, plantsy wrote:Tammy, we miss you...
Hi!
I miss you too, but I'm here now.
Well not for much longer; I'm about to pass out I hope!
In post 1617, plantsy wrote:Tammy, we miss you...
I probably didn't use my words in the correct way there. What I mean is that I'd not know his vote was still RVS since he posted since then but didn't move it. So there's no way for me to have known that yet he gave Titus a pass for looking at it that way, but not me, because he was starting from the conclusion that I'm scum and working backwards from there. Hence presupposing I'm scum.In post 1899, Imperium wrote:I don't understand your point. How would him assuming that presuppose you're scum?In post 1574, JaeReed wrote:Again, I'm baffled by the fact that you seem to believe I'd bother to go back and check why you made the vote. Why can't I make the same misunderstanding that Titus did with just a quick look at the VCs to further my push on someone that isn't playing to their town meta? Better yet, it being RVS but you having posted since without moving it, why would you assume that I'd know your vote isIn post 1571, Leonshade wrote:Titus basing her thoughts on a vote count and misinterpreting the voters' intentions as a result doesn't surprise me (based on her self-stated playstyle of caring more about votes than posts), whereas JaeReed using Titus's misinterpretation to their advantage struck me as manipulative. Downplaying it as not manipulative is incorrect, as Jae wasn't using my RVS vote on S&W as the basis for their SR. They were not presenting a case and asking for votes; they used another person's thoughts to their advantage to try to get a vote. This is literally manipulation, but it's not yet scummy. The scummy part was them taking advantage of Titus's misunderstanding.stillRVS? To see it that way you have to pre-suppose I'm scum. That's starting from a conclusion and fitting the evidence to it, rather than using the evidence to reach a conclusion.
Titus can you explain to me where this belief came from? Has mastina in the past not believed a claim in RVS when there have been similar complementary roles? If so, could you please point me to the game(s)?In post 83, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Mastina usually wouldn't believe a hated claim if you're loved...
I am sorry if you feel it was unfair, but I called you out because you complained in a way that I felt was trying to put blame somewhere else. Those others have not complained, I do not think, although I have already called out Creature and Maxwell, before you, so I don't know why you say that. You have posts, yes, but I don't feel that you have done anything really substantial. Your push on Maxwell... Max is below null for me, yes, but your jump on that wagon felt scummy to me, and it came after everyone else. So I am at a loss as to what you have done with your own initiative that is pushing this game anywhere. If you are sorting players passively and following the game, that's great. But I don't understand the purpose of trying to blame Imperium for inactivity. You can do things without Imperium. I understand that because I am scumreading your slot I am more likely to think that your motives are not good. So I am sorry if I am misreading your intentions. If it's just your frustration? Okay, I get it. I've been there. If that's the case, feel free to come talk to me if you like, maybe I can help you feel better and more involved.In post 1784, Shiro wrote:Like no OK, when half the game has been circling about and half the game being none existent(max,over,not mafia, imperium, yume(though from.the little she has I do think she is town),creature and to some extend mastina and mhsmith )you don't come to me and tell me I am doing fucking nothing >.>
It's not the question that I like but the observation itself. Like I know there are players predisposed to scumreading me and it's always annoying in a kneejerk emotional reaction way when it happens, even though I know it'll happen (nancy is a good example of one of these people). What's lacking in Oversoul's post is that emotional reaction that I expect to be there. Annoyance or frustration or amusement or anything really. It reads flat.In post 1908, Imperium wrote:Heh I actually hated that observation in post 60 both when smith did it and when I think mastin did it. I pretty much hate that line of questioning in general as it's a pretty stupid observation to make. Oversoul wouldn't be assuming mastin is town at that point anymore than anyone who makes the same observation oversoul made does in any game. It's just a common reaction to, yet again, seeing yourself in someone's scum lists. It's similar to when someone expresses disappointment that someone who can usually read them is reading them wrong.
It's just a reaction which doesn't denote a presumption of the alignment of the other person at all. Smiths was done early enough in the game that I wrote it off as early game pushing but it's something so easy for scum to push at because on the surface it looks like a good observation and sound scumhunting but it really isn't. It's fine to start interaction with, so for early game interaction push it's fine, but making an actual argument with it is garbage.
It reading flat is something I agree with.In post 1909, JaeReed wrote:It's not the question that I like but the observation itself. Like I know there are players predisposed to scumreading me and it's always annoying in a kneejerk emotional reaction way when it happens, even though I know it'll happen (nancy is a good example of one of these people). What's lacking in Oversoul's post is that emotional reaction that I expect to be there. Annoyance or frustration or amusement or anything really. It reads flat.In post 1908, Imperium wrote:Heh I actually hated that observation in post 60 both when smith did it and when I think mastin did it. I pretty much hate that line of questioning in general as it's a pretty stupid observation to make. Oversoul wouldn't be assuming mastin is town at that point anymore than anyone who makes the same observation oversoul made does in any game. It's just a common reaction to, yet again, seeing yourself in someone's scum lists. It's similar to when someone expresses disappointment that someone who can usually read them is reading them wrong.
It's just a reaction which doesn't denote a presumption of the alignment of the other person at all. Smiths was done early enough in the game that I wrote it off as early game pushing but it's something so easy for scum to push at because on the surface it looks like a good observation and sound scumhunting but it really isn't. It's fine to start interaction with, so for early game interaction push it's fine, but making an actual argument with it is garbage.
Why are you willing to tentatively call me town over that? I don't know, it feels like a soft way to back off a scumread and an easy way to ignore the rest of my content? Also, your reads feel very strange to me. Why are you townreading Maxwell, Ramcius and itlepip? What makes Titus null? I am really uncomfortable how you have Shiro and mastina in null because you say you don't think you can parse FA emotion and you were pocketed by mastina before. I mean, I understand the feeling when you are basing your read on someone because of false meta from an ongoing game where you had the wrong read but I feel like putting mastina just null from it without trying to go any further is just really easy and I wish you did not feel so blasé about your reads.In post 1855, Leonshade wrote:Meanwhile, after plantsy & Jae's explanation of their argument, I'm willing to tentatively call plantsy town over it.
{KeySkiies, JaeReed}
{Imperium, itlepip, Ramcius, Steven Quartz, Maxwell, plantsy}
{Not_Mafia, Titus, mastina, Shiro, SlySly}
{Creature}
{Oversoul, mhsmith}
Okay... but that's all you have to say? They were mostly rhetorical, but I was also interested to see whether you engaged with them and to what extent. I am sorry but I am so underwhelmed by this response from you...In post 1859, Leonshade wrote:@plantsy:I've read your ISO of me, seeing your detailed thoughts has made me more convinced that there's actual substance behind your reads, it's another reason why I've started townreading you. I'm not sure whether you meant your questions as rhetorical or for me to answer, let me know what you want answered.
That was me, not Plotinus.In post 1883, JaeReed wrote:me: nancy knows I've been dissociating irl and pushed on that therefore she's scum
Plot?: Don't do that
FfsIn post 1879, plantsy wrote:but I'm scared to jinx it
I don't know about Plotinus for sure but I feel the same way. I have scumreads but none of them are reads I really believe in yet. That's unusual for me (you've seen me deathtunnel scum on day 1 and have 4 correct hard scumreads within 48 hours) and it's making me uncomfortable but I'm hoping that something clicks at some point and the game starts to make more sense for me. Right now I do have 3 townreads that I really believe in and I guess for the time being the best option I have is to talk with those slots to try to get somewhere together. (You being caught up and Nacho coming back will really really help I hope.)In post 1886, Imperium wrote:Also, I just realized the reason why I'm not as confident on Plantsy as I'd like to be is because I don't have a strong scum read I'm feeling great about. Thanks to Nacho for trying to get me to figure out where my hesitation is. Lacking a strong scumread always makes it more difficult for me to believe in my town reads.
Nacho are you here? Come talk?In post 1885, Imperium wrote:but it's not really necessary; there's a huge town body of work to supplement this i just think that this sequence actually never ever comes from scum
I felt the same. In fact there was very little to townread from RC at all, his refusal to talk to me was what bothered me the most, and if he wasn't RC I think he would have been widely scumread for his play. RC unfortunately does do these terrible plays as town. But I reset the read when RC replaced out. I don't want to go back and read the slot. I don't want to read any more RC posts ever if I can avoid it. My townread of Titus is due to her head. It's my weakest townread and one that I haven't done a lot of work on yet, but it's nonetheless above null. I don't think I scumread anything from her head even while I was scumreading RC, I like her real-time interactions, and she has softed some sort of role that I struggle to see as being from scum. I can talk about this more later (I'm very time poor right now) but that's the most basic overview.In post 1891, Imperium wrote:Sorry for being unclear.
Would you mind talking about why you think Titus could be town? I thought RC's push on FA sucked (it was a good case that didn't actually follow what happened in thread which is good scum play 101 + terrible town play 101) and I thought he could very possibly be scum from it.
I don't really agree with this. He knew that I hadn't locked his alignment. I think he knew why I was scumreading him, too. He was just being obstinate.In post 1893, plantsy wrote:thinking back on rc's replace out it felt like he was angry that nancy misread him.
I've talked about this with nancy this morning and I'm going to trust her on this one because she knows him better than I do; the replace out was null. I do want to reread Titus later but not right now.In post 1923, plantsy wrote:I don't really agree with this. He knew that I hadn't locked his alignment. I think he knew why I was scumreading him, too. He was just being obstinate.In post 1893, plantsy wrote:thinking back on rc's replace out it felt like he was angry that nancy misread him.