Open 63 -- Friends and Enemies 2.0 (Denouement) before 562

Joubert · Post Post #16 (isolation #0) » Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:27 pm

Vote =/

, for trying to justify his nickname...

Joubert · Post Post #23 (isolation #1) » Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:59 am

Khelvaster wrote:
JimSauce wrote:
Joubert wrote:
Vote =/
, for trying to justify his nickname...
Do you always vote people for defending themselves?
I am compelled to answer for Joubert--he does indeed. I need to
Vote: Joubert
for that.

Oy, don't make up things when I'm asleep...

Joubert · Post Post #29 (isolation #2) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:38 am

Then, change your vote to the guy "named" equal-slash...

Joubert · Post Post #34 (isolation #3) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:29 pm

We are at different levels of joking, here. Some are joking, some are faking the seriousness, some are joking about the joking, and some are joking about being serious about the jokiness of the jokes...

Therefore, =/ is Scum. Lynch him ASAP...

Joubert · Post Post #39 (isolation #4) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:09 pm

I'd like to borrow someone else's vote...

Joubert · Post Post #43 (isolation #5) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:51 pm

Ahaha... Busted!

Unvote
Vote: Khelvaster

Joubert · Post Post #63 (isolation #6) » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:22 pm

So, you mean living in Australia is considered a feat?
By the way, Oman, if you think there's nothing relevant in the first 2 pages, what do you suggest to get the game going?

Joubert · Post Post #67 (isolation #7) » Fri Feb 22, 2008 5:42 pm

Don't try, Khelvaster, if we didn't count you, we'd have 11 players...

Joubert · Post Post #83 (isolation #8) » Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:36 am

Actually, I find the situation quite funny. It's like entering into a party of people you don't even know, without them being aware that you're a stranger, and after a while, you talk to everyone as if you were invited. I did that a few times and it turned out to be quite interesting...

Joubert · Post Post #91 (isolation #9) » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:12 pm

But Oman, you can't assume that the replacement did not read the old player's posts and follow-up properly. Maybe, but maybe not...

Anyways, I don't really agree with the sudden mega bandwagoning on Oman for, yes as he said, virtually nothing. It looks more like some people didn't know who to vote so they snatched the next little clumsy detail and they stepped on the occasion to enter a vote other than the random one...

Joubert · Post Post #104 (isolation #10) » Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:33 pm

What's your "content", Cavebear?

Joubert · Post Post #115 (isolation #11) » Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:08 am

That's right, my vote doesn't make sense a lot. Going for a re-read...

Unvote

Joubert · Post Post #149 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:35 pm

What's a "massive" FoS anyway?

So if we take for granted that ThAdmiral was really doing his "accusation" lighty, without any serious intentions, then yes, I would tend to agree that Six Aces' reaction was somewhat exaggerated. But on the other hand, it's still far fetched to accuse someone based on such an "error", or "slip" as some people called it... Hard to say...

I'd like to suggest a No-Lynch, but I won't consider it since last time I almost got lynched only because I evoqued the possiblity...

Joubert · Post Post #166 (isolation #13) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:48 am

A falsified joke in such a context? Don't like it at all. What are the odds?

Mega-FoS: Oman

Joubert · Post Post #197 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:04 pm

JimSauce wrote:They can't sneak through if we force them to post (without lynching them) so therefore, FaLtP>LaL. You lose!

FaLtP ? LaL ? Hmmm...

Joubert · Post Post #204 (isolation #15) » Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:41 pm

If it can pressure him a little, why not?
He also claimed Scum in post #36. We'll see if it's true...

Joubert · Post Post #214 (isolation #16) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:41 am

It's reasonable to say that TrustGossip is not lurking anymore, it's really an absentee, so we should not vote him on that basis...

Joubert · Post Post #222 (isolation #17) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:00 pm

I consider that if Khelvaster can't post regularly in all his games, he must have too much on his shoulders...

Vote: Khelvaster

Joubert · Post Post #234 (isolation #18) » Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:14 pm

Everyone can vote Khelvaster, except for me... Interesting...

Joubert · Post Post #250 (isolation #19) » Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:20 pm

This game is too slow. As soon as someone is at lynch-1, I hammer him/her real hard in the face...

Joubert · Post Post #268 (isolation #20) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:06 pm

JimSauce, so you really think hammering is a sure scum-tell? My theory gets confirmed even more...

Joubert · Post Post #270 (isolation #21) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:42 pm

Mah, if it's not the case, it's okay...
And I don't see how I could defend myself more...
I didn't OMGUS, though...

Joubert · Post Post #272 (isolation #22) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:26 pm

I don't have a clue about why you would vote me...

Joubert · Post Post #276 (isolation #23) » Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:26 am

Ah, I see... Post 223... Khelvaster started posting again, so it's not relevant anymore...

Joubert · Post Post #279 (isolation #24) » Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:51 pm

Yes, I would let the scum NK two masons to prevent the town mislynching one.
Dude, I may be a bad player most of the time, but I'm not a stupid one.

Sheesh, of course, losing the only "power roles" we have (and 2 of them) is more detrimental for the Town than a single Vanilla Townie. That's obvious. Mathematically obvious...

Unvote

Vote: Peers

Joubert · Post Post #282 (isolation #25) » Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:23 pm

Ah...

Unvote

Joubert · Post Post #297 (isolation #26) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:24 pm

Maybe I wasn't so wrong about my declaration after all; the one that made JimSauce hate me...

Joubert · Post Post #316 (isolation #27) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:58 pm

So BlckKnght is voting blindly without ever knowing he's hammering or not? Great...

Joubert · Post Post #329 (isolation #28) » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:46 pm

I think I'll claim too, although it may reveal very dangerous. I am a Mason. Let's hope we can deduce from all this information. If you can find a way to proove that Khelvaster and I are telling the truth, then let us know and we'll see. If we manage to make it clear with the rest of the Town, finding Scum will become easier...

Joubert · Post Post #349 (isolation #29) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:04 pm

I did not understand exactly Cavebear's theory, but it seemed legitimate and strategic. The reason I claimed is mainly because I was tired of the slow motion this game took, and I wanted to shake things...

Oman decided to reply quickly, it's a nice try, but it won't stick. Khelvaster really is a Mason and I am, but Oman is not. Since I am already in the open, Khelvaster can confirm that I am saying truth and that Oman is lying...

I'm not sure anymore if it's a good thing to reveal the other Mason, though. In other words, the reason we decided to "claim" all at once (it's not really "all", anyways) is because Oman jumped on the claim wagon to confuse things as much as he could...

So at least we can lynch Oman with confidence today...

Joubert · Post Post #365 (isolation #30) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:30 pm

Oman, you were annoyed that I crashed your plan, and I can understand that if you really are a Townie, but I couldn't possibly know about that. All the entire setup is WIFOM-packed. Exchanging 1 Townie (or even a Mason) for 1 Scum is still good for the Town. It's a fundamental reaction following a claim...

By the way, I thought about a plan that could at least confirm 2 Masons without any doubt, but there's only one thing that gets in our way: the fact that Khelvaster is a replacement. Maybe the Mod will have to intervene...

More to come on that machiavelic plan...

Joubert · Post Post #373 (isolation #31) » Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:01 pm

Well, his reaction had to be weighted because he could be a Townie saying the truth. But maybe not. Now that we have the deadline, and the Mod didn't reply to my question yet, I thought it should be a better idea to find someone else to lynch, because once I can set my plan up, Oman will be confirmed...

BUT, the very fact I said that means the Mafia could kill Oman to erase the traces. If he's not killed this night (they could kill me though), it would raise suspicion on him. BUT again, WIFOM...

Joubert · Post Post #384 (isolation #32) » Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:04 pm

Let's go... Seems like No Lynch is not good right now...

Vote: =/

Oman wrote:Joubert gets bad point (not scum, just bad) for saying that if I don't die tonight I'm suspicious.

Like you said for me, Oman, you could be suspicious, but not super Scummy.

Joubert · Post Post #398 (isolation #33) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:17 pm

Oman, what do you think we could do to confirm your Towniness further?

Joubert · Post Post #407 (isolation #34) » Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:32 pm

This game is screwed up real good...

Joubert · Post Post #419 (isolation #35) » Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

The thing is, Oman could very well be Townie, but alas, the doubt is casted and we can't go back. Else, I'm willing to go for =/ ...

Joubert · Post Post #423 (isolation #36) » Mon May 05, 2008 2:04 pm

Let's have a second random voting stage!

Joubert · Post Post #442 (isolation #37) » Thu May 15, 2008 3:58 pm

Dammit, xyzzy, that was one helluva big ass post you made there!

The surprising thing right now is the lingering suspicion on Khelvaster. Anyhow, if at some point he's being targeted, we'lll have to use the Secret Plan™...

Vote: JimSauce

Joubert · Post Post #445 (isolation #38) » Thu May 15, 2008 9:03 pm

ThAdmiral wrote:Furthermore I am hardly inclined to accept the validity of a jimsauce-=/ scumpair after i was included in this scum team, and I
know
I am not scum.

I don't understand the point of specifying that you

know

you are not scum. It's a given. Everyone

knows

he's not scum...

Joubert · Post Post #469 (isolation #39) » Wed May 21, 2008 4:34 pm

Vote: BlckKnght

Joubert · Post Post #480 (isolation #40) » Thu May 22, 2008 6:56 pm

I think many people could have read Oman's post about the pseudo-claim, and it's comprenable... And ambiguous... Duh...

About BabyGirl, it sounds more like a lack of experience and/or lack of interest and/or genuine lack of time. So, yeah, we may have to replace once more. But lynching her (I assume she's a she) would be as pointless and without substance than lynching JimSauce on the basis of having "missed" him before the deadline yesterday. There's still

some

dirt on him, though...

Joubert · Post Post #514 (isolation #41) » Sun May 25, 2008 11:26 am

Ah, if we need it so badly, then let's go...

Vote: babygirl86