outside of a few actions which (contextually) i could never see coming from one alignment or could only see coming from one alignment, i think you should look at each action on a spectrum of how likely it is to come from town and scum and then balance it out at the end for your read - ideally your read should be formed from multiple posts (ideally, the vast majority) on one end of the town->scum spectrum
if, in the end, you happen to change your read from a correct one to an incorrect one then at least you can look back at where you put which posts on the spectrum and figure out where you went wrong (which is the difficult part but the part that yields the most value if you manage to do it correctly)
as far as preventative measures, there aren't any, except insofar as continuous improvement and trying not to make the same mistakes is preventative. re-evaluating reads is, in general, good (not necessarily
rethinking
, but just reading things from a different perspective or assessing whether your reasoning holds water), so you don't want to not do that... you just want to make sure that your criteria for evaluation is as correct as it can possibly be
spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh spiffeh
