Elias_the_thief wrote:I was just gauging his response to it...i dont get why everyone is so bothered by it.
Mostly because you then responded to holy's vote with a request for reasoning without giving any of your own.
Elias_the_thief, Jan 18, Day 1 wrote:the case against Akonas seems kind of silly and exaggerated. But its enough to make him unworthy of immunity.
What changed? I'm assuming it's "I am not very suspicious of Akonas. The case on him sucked yesterday, and his full support of the Hasdgfas wagon only reinforces his townness. "
Elias voted for hasdgfas "on the basis of the NK of SJ", and didn't support himself all that well at the beginning, which I'm assuming is because he just came in. Just mentioning.
Holy wrote:Okay Rigel, I guess I'll downgrade my suspicion towards you because I can accept your explanation about it I guess.
About Akonas, I'm thinking what he said about more than 1 scum-group, I speculate about an SK, I don't know if an SK interpreted as group by him, but if he's an SK, we can avoid 2 deaths tonight. So, I'm thinking about Akonas lynch more than hasdgfas lynch right now based on that.
This is your only justification for voting me, it seems.
Vote: Holy.
After rereading, I don't like you.
We still need to hear more from more people, especially QuickBen.
Mod:
A round of prods, please?
because your brain affects your guts (and vice versa).