VOTE: theslimer3
Nah wbu?theslimer3 wrote:Ahoy there everyone. Arb ~
Did you roll scum this time?
That's nice but you didn't answer my question. >:|In post 13, theslimer3 wrote:I like that answer. You get a townie badge
Oh my god stop pushing my townbloc you suck.In post 18, WhemeStar wrote:Like this oneIn post 15, theslimer3 wrote:<.< Nope I got town this time. You'll have to deal with my townie shinnanegins this time
Presumably because of the OMGUS vote. ^_^In post 28, PenguinPower wrote:Can you explain said serious vote?
Yup my vote has forced reasoning I don't believe in. If my vote was completely random nobody would feel compelled to read into it.In post 51, WhemeStar wrote:It just felt realllyyy bad and fake
No I'm indifferent about being on a wagon in RvS.PenguinPower wrote:So, that was a serious vote on Wheme?
The same reason you submitted an RvS vote probably. If I tried decrypting tone/motive it would also be forced and I'd be lying to myself.In post 58, acidphoenix wrote:ARB why force an RVS vote instead of trying to do an actual read-into something to create legitimate pressure?
What makes you think the former?In post 63, PenguinPower wrote:I'm back to thinking that Wheme was overly defensive about his wagon, and is reaching for a reason to scum read ARB.
Does making a new wagon further anything?In post 90, IaShoggoth wrote:I was looking at the VC from the top of the page and opted for someone that hadn't been voted yet,
If phoenix's posts can come from both town and mafia why the vote? Why focus on this slot?In post 108, SIV36 wrote:VOTE: AcidPhoenix
After studying everyone's ISO's briefly, it's my belief that these posts of substance from this slot could have easily been made as both town, and easily as mafia. It just seems that it might come from a position of knowledge of the alignment.
Is this a repeat of your pressure onto my vote or something new?In post 126, WhemeStar wrote:Siv is scum
I don't like this reaction. You've not inquired or directly engaged Wheme about his push or vote but you're assuming a lot about it.In post 135, SIV36 wrote:Spartan is not exactly saying that people should have detailed reads on people. He's saying that Wheme should because wheme is utterly convinced now that I'm mafia.
It seems to me that wheme doesn't even have any reason or case for any of his claims, he is just shooting in the dark and hoping we all think he's legitimately scum-hunting ....
friend is here, I'll finish thought later....
In post 139, WhemeStar wrote:This is different, I actually think siv is scum
This is a good response and I like the push later in the thread.In post 147, SIV36 wrote:I was ISO'ing each player, and just judging from gut. I was trying to see who seems to comment based on the perspective of not fully knowing the alignment of other player's roles vs comments which seem like they may know 'too well' who the mafia is and not. When I read acidPhoenix's posts, my gut kinda reads it as someone who was just a little 'too sure' of the other players and their intentions. Compared to the other ISO's, acidPhoenix's fitted that the most.
I was essentially being asked why I didn't analyze and push anything on page one here. This seemed like nonsense/filler, a means of discrediting nothing.In post 58, acidphoenix wrote:ARB why force an RVS vote instead of trying to do an actual read-into something to create legitimate pressure?
This is understandable but not actually a post I found scum orientated. I felt your response to Wheme was much more suspicious because you didn't actually confront the scumread rather strawman his perspective. For example:In post 148, SIV36 wrote:But still, you say you're really sure that I'm scum. I voted you, you asked me if I was scum, and I thought the question was really silly. Did you want me to say no? I decided to instead convey how silly I thought the question was. I found it hilarious, especially because I believe you were serious about it.
The entire basis for this claim was Wheme asserting you're scum based off a vote and reaction and jumping to that assumption is usually the route of panic to debunk the pressure.In post 135, SIV36 wrote:he is just shooting in the dark and hoping we all think he's legitimately scum-hunting ....
What does this mean? We will probably look at the game at a larger scale and this incident may become miniscule in comparison but right now we're in the single digit pages.In post 149, SIV36 wrote:I mentioned something about stressing the importance of looking at the bigger picture when judging people instead of only focusing on a small incident.
I'd not say so. I think scum would be mindful of this too. It wouldn't be sufficient enough to bait a hammer like this.In post 157, Spartan117 wrote:I thought this was a scummy move since he put him to L-1 without making it apparent, which is conflicting on my previous views of wheme
I don't really think Wheme has much else to add so I'll pitch in; L-1 is good pressure and putting your scumlean in the spotlight is ideal that is how players become more confident in scumreads. I don't find this indicative.In post 166, Spartan117 wrote:I find this a really scummy thing to say, I dont see how someone who is town would say they "don't really care" about putting someone to L-1, there is no way town can be 100% on someone being mafia especially this early on, only mafia know the alignments of everyone.
What am I supposed to be looking at in 149?In post 168, IaShoggoth wrote:I don't feel confident in this as an actual scum-read, but I feel like Sivs casual response to being on L-1 followed by a total reversal of position was scummy, see 149 and 159
I'm hoping I covered this already.In post 167, Spartan117 wrote:What do you think of #158 with wheme not being bothered about putting SIV to L-1 even though he was the only one who voted because of a scum read on him.
I don't personally think this is scum indicative enough, I don't think he's discouraging early reads he just seemed to be slow at establishing his own. It would be helpful if he explained why he was indifferent or engage reads made by others so he can build his own.In post 169, Spartan117 wrote:I also agree on the surprise slimer had to early reads being a scum read, I dont see how that can be a negative thing for town, and would be a passive goal for mafia to slow the game down, not once but twice did they question need for reads.
I'm in mutual agreement here since SIV made clear the possibility of his lynch. He knew he was at risk so he should prioritize his reads being heard which he is doing right now so that's good.In post 173, Spartan117 wrote:Here it felt like an emotional plea as if the next comment was going to be the vote to lynch him, and I dont see what I imagine felt like his lasts words to be something productive (obviously no one wants to get lynched but its much worse for scum to get lynched than town) I would have thought in a townies position it would be better of to push for any last reads that could contribute towards the townies finding someone in the mafia if he was lynched and turned out to be town. In reality if he had been lynched and he is town then his final contribution would have only been that we should look at the bigger picture which doesnt point us anywhere.
I'm debating whether this is a genuine town-slip or not because mafia should know their numbers. I'd have thought the alignment distribution be straight-forward but it may not be for some newcomers so I asked for experience.In post 172, Spartan117 wrote:we have 6 town and 3 maf
I'm leaning SIV scum and Wheme town.In post 193, PenguinPower wrote:Arb, who's scum? You've commented a lot, but I'm not seeing where you've taken a stance, and I believe you aren't voting right now.
Why didn't you like Wheme before?In post 200, mhsmith0 wrote:
Was this game a newbie?In post 305, Spartan117 wrote:This is something that no one has really commented on, the answer to your question is yes they do, (before you say I know because I am scum, I know this mainly because the the only other time I have ever played a game on here I was scum) It is interesting that you mention it, I gather you have gone back through the posts since the start searching for leads which shows intent for clue finding, and the content of the question could be indicative of an inexperienced townie or scum trying to play the townie who is very new to the game.
This is a decent take. I'm puzzled that Rob can retell his experience in the mafia chat but simultaneously doesn't remember the amount of mafia. By itself I can't come to a conclusion I'd have to PbPA his ISO later.In post 348, theslimer3 wrote:In post 172, Spartan117 wrote:Yeah monkey, we have 6 town and 3 maf rightSo you don't know how many mafia members there are despite the fact that you were in a game once before eh? Well I've gone through your profile and you were indeed scum in a newbie, so the idea of you not knowing that there isn't 2 scum shouldn't slip your mind because the open game you were in was around the same time as it was with the newbieIn post 305, Spartan117 wrote:This is something that no one has really commented on, the answer to your question is yes they do, (before you say I know because I am scum, I know this mainly because the the only other time I have ever played a game on here I was scum)In post 256, SIV36 wrote: Do the mafia get to talk before the day started?
You had pregame talk with your only partner and now you suddenly think that theres a magic 3rd member?
I'd say the question regarding me, as well as a few others, don't fall under either criterion. They're all just filler questions. Why did you ask this?In post 213, acidphoenix wrote:I asked the questions a. because they let me actually push someone towards actually helping to reveal alignments and b. in some of them I just actually wanted the answers
In post 183, ARBITRIO wrote:I was essentially being asked why I didn't analyze and push anything on page one here. This seemed like nonsense/filler, a means of discrediting nothing.In post 58, acidphoenix wrote:ARB why force an RVS vote instead of trying to do an actual read-into something to create legitimate pressure?
This was on SIV I believe. Why was this vote removed?
What changed? You spewed him town earlier for his counter-push but you're flipping on him without any reason.In post 245, SIV36 wrote:*facepalm* I have no idea how to read wheme, but I think he might have potential to be mafia as well.
I wouldn't say nitpicky but narrow-minded because there's many opportunities it comes from uncertain town.In post 248, SIV36 wrote:Your reasoning for this is that it's the way you talk. I'll admit as well that what I pointed out could be something people could have done as town. I could be nitpicking. However, comparing the reasoning used for scumhunting by other players in this game, my method is pretty well just as legitimate.
Yup. It's a good strategy believe it or not, but not really realistic in this situation. Nobody should feel they're a locked lynch candidate and willfully hammering a wagon T-8 days deserves attention for the rest of the game.In post 230, SIV36 wrote:Your response to why you shouldn't let your scum-confirmed read go to L-2 or L-1:
Let's keep this in context. You mean to tell me a "mafia" quickhammers themselves, and mafia partners come in and 'bus' their partners (Especially in situations like the one we have now). Is this place retarded or something? Why would they do that to continue their win-con? We only have 2 mafia.In post 217, PenguinPower wrote:
A player quickhammering themselves (or a partner coming in and pretending to lol/derphammer) is a tactic used by scum to deny town more information.
Well of course there's discrepancies in a push Wheme never had any conviction for in the first place. What's your point?In post 310, SIV36 wrote:And I don't believe anyone really has caught the strange order of wheme's posts having to do with his 'bad vote'. Wheme keeps saying his 'bad vote' reflects the vote on arb, but the 'bad vote' in question is significantly before he voted anyone. Ergo, he doesn't seem like he's being completely forth-coming. The way he's explaining the bad vote doesn't match up with what actually transpired.
You're creating all these scenarios where Wheme flips scum but why is Wheme actually scum? Why isn't your vote on him?In post 434, SIV36 wrote:That's trippy. Then I went back and found way too much of these:
The underlined is the only reason you've dismissed your dislike? You put thought into Wheme's pushes earlier considering motive, nothing of the sorts here except he's given reads.In post 207, PenguinPower wrote:I don't believe that one should rely on meta alone, and Wheme appears overtly scummy, but I modded a scum!Wheme, and he played completely different than this. Granted, he didn't participate in the RVS/early day, buthe actually made a concerted effort to give reads and reasons.
With what I've read sure but in this context he voted a player he expressed suspicions on earlier so what am I missing here?In post 239, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Oh wow. SIV you're impossibly scummy.
In post 319, humaneatingmonkey wrote:20th. Another partnership I've been seeing is Penguin-Spartan but I don't know how productive it is for scum to -actually buddy up- since the usual set up is them distancing for each other. This is clouded in a cloud of cloudy WIFOM.
Uhm. I think this was in regards to Spartan; I don't understand the progression here. Correct me if I'm wrong.In post 406, humaneatingmonkey wrote:You're... a townread now. That was so idiotically town thing to say.
Confused but okay.In post 471, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Humaneatingquestion #3 - This is in regard to SIV. He commented something goofy with regard to the votecount. I just thought a scum would try to form much more convincing arguments than "hmm the mod posted a gif of celebration when spartan became L-1". Which is seriously goofy-towny. However, I'm not too sold on my assessment there. Wheme's strategy when he explained it offered more promise than me townreading somene over a goofy statement
Then respond to the stuff relevant to Wheme because it's reoccurred a lot recently.SIV36 wrote:Arbitrio that stuff was on page 10. Stuff I really didn't want to revisit.
...meh.
._.SIV36 wrote:Go! Go! Anti-scumhunter!
That comment from wheme about phoenix was one out of 8. When a duck quacks 8 times, I'm gonna start thinking it's a duck.
What do you think now that SIV flipped town?humaneatingmonkey wrote:Wheme can be scum too even if SIV flips scum. This hammer changes everything. Be cautious and paranoid of everyone, town.
...no?In post 683, innocentvillager wrote:The way you worded that is like you know I'm town LOL
I brought it up earlier by responding to a quote and Aaron didn't answer the first time. He stated Wheme is scum regardless solely because of the hammer so it's the only relevant thing accompanying the vote.In post 690, acidphoenix wrote:why question the hammer when it wasn't brought up?
Wheme is tonal town for his straight-to-the-point posting, I like how his standpoints are pushed to allow for a reaction afterwards it demonstrates looking for read development and his transition in opinion afterwards seems to reflect this. He doesn't cherry-coat his pushes for town-cred either.In post 671, ARBITRIO wrote:humaneatingmonkey wrote:
Wheme can be scum too even if SIV flips scum. This hammer changes everything. Be cautious and paranoid of everyone, town.
What do you think now that SIV flipped town?
What did you think of acid when you talked to him?In post 715, innocentvillager wrote:i will produce content, sorry. Am always a bit slow to replace in especially to multiple games but once I do i will have activity up.