also, i've been here for like 8 monthsIn post 1495, MathBlade wrote:Not as confident there like I was on read through but gut says Sesq = too scummy to be scum which I know is not a thing but I've replaced into a slot that Sesq played that was horrible. I just think Sesq is a newb.In post 1493, Egg wrote:Mathblade, I'd vote havingfitz before wave but I'm MUCH more confident in sesq.
Where do you see mathblade flipping other than maybe the read on you?In post 1499, Sesq wrote:the amount of flipping with mathblade is just really disconcerting
game/math team, maybe
also
>people scumreading me
I still don't see the issue.In post 1502, Sesq wrote:seems like they had a really sudden hop onto havingfitz
then again, they just entered the game, that can happen
still "disconcerting", as is fitz' play
So you're scum then? You're scum or making newbie mistakes. Take your pick. Because I can tell right now you don't believe you are a moron. And you're completely discounting the fact I have experience with you and your town game sucks. Instead you're trying to attack the fact I call you a newb, which skill is what makes someone not a newb not time, instead of the merits. I townread you because your play is horrible similar to the newbie I replaced you in.In post 1500, Sesq wrote:also, i've been here for like 8 monthsIn post 1495, MathBlade wrote:Not as confident there like I was on read through but gut says Sesq = too scummy to be scum which I know is not a thing but I've replaced into a slot that Sesq played that was horrible. I just think Sesq is a newb.In post 1493, Egg wrote:Mathblade, I'd vote havingfitz before wave but I'm MUCH more confident in sesq.
i'm not a newb anymore, i'm just a moron
get your shit straight
For example this post here....Sesq *facepalm* if you be scums you be bad scums if you be Town you be bad Town.In post 1499, Sesq wrote:the amount of flipping with mathblade is just really disconcerting
game/math team, maybe
also
>people scumreading me
It's called pressure. Learn it love it breathe it.In post 1502, Sesq wrote:seems like they had a really sudden hop onto havingfitz
then again, they just entered the game, that can happen
still "disconcerting", as is fitz' play
It is.In post 1503, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm not convinced that suggesting mass claim is scummy
In post 1496, wavemode wrote:How am I caught scum? I mean, explain that sentiment to me cause its confusing.
In post 1498, wavemode wrote:What specifically makes it worse than all the other votes?In post 1470, MathBlade wrote:This vote is horrible.In post 1364, wavemode wrote:That's the thing, I don't know if we have the votes. And we're running out of time here. But it's worth a shot
VOTE: Titus
A) You aren't scumhunting you're focused on defending yourself.In post 1512, wavemode wrote:@mathblade
In post 1496, wavemode wrote:How am I caught scum? I mean, explain that sentiment to me cause its confusing.In post 1498, wavemode wrote:What specifically makes it worse than all the other votes?In post 1470, MathBlade wrote:This vote is horrible.In post 1364, wavemode wrote:That's the thing, I don't know if we have the votes. And we're running out of time here. But it's worth a shot
VOTE: Titus
A) Of course they do but it isn't their main focus.In post 1514, wavemode wrote:Did you read the game? Or what are you trying to pull with this
A) So town don't defend themselves when people make statements about them. Nice I'll use that tell from now on, sounds foolproof.
B) You didn't read any of my numerous arguments and wallposts about my scumreads?
C) You didn't read when I was the top wagon for pushing my scumreads?
D) You don't understand that it's better to compromise on a vote that will go through than tunnel stubbornly and no-lynch?